Register to reply

Gram Schmidt Orthonormalization

by theFuture
Tags: gram, orthonormalization, schmidt
Share this thread:
Oct26-04, 09:48 PM
P: 80
So I'm to show that the non-zero vector w={v e V|<v,x> = 0} for all x in V that dim(w)=dim(V)-1.

It recommends using the Gram-Schmidt process to prove this but I tried to work it out and I couldn't make any sense of it. Any suggestions on how to start this out?

[edit]: nevermind, I got it. If you were curious, start by saying x is an element of the set S that is linearly independent and spans V. Then do G-S on V and you find that you lose an element of the set, so there you have it.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Mysterious source of ozone-depleting chemical baffles NASA
Water leads to chemical that gunks up biofuels production
How lizards regenerate their tails: Researchers discover genetic 'recipe'
Oct27-04, 08:50 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 39,495
I think what you mean to say is "prove that the subspace consisting of all vectors v such that <v, x>= 0 (where x is non-zero) has dimension dim(V)- 1."
Select a basis for V containing x and perform a "Gram-Schmidt" starting the process with x as the first vector (so Gram-Schmidt will give a basis containing one basis vector in the same direction as x).
Oct27-04, 11:35 PM
P: 80
That's definitely what I meant, but I copied it verbatim from my crappy book (Messer's Linear Algebra) starting with "show the vector . . ." It's good with proofs, not so good with the math.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Gram-Schmidt problem - I'm stuck Linear & Abstract Algebra 9
Gram–Schmidt process Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
Help with gram schmidt and T*! Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Gram Schmidt Linear & Abstract Algebra 2
Gram-Schmidt Process Calculus & Beyond Homework 1