Gram Schmidt Orthonormalization


by theFuture
Tags: gram, orthonormalization, schmidt
theFuture
theFuture is offline
#1
Oct26-04, 09:48 PM
P: 80
So I'm to show that the non-zero vector w={v e V|<v,x> = 0} for all x in V that dim(w)=dim(V)-1.

It recommends using the Gram-Schmidt process to prove this but I tried to work it out and I couldn't make any sense of it. Any suggestions on how to start this out?

[edit]: nevermind, I got it. If you were curious, start by saying x is an element of the set S that is linearly independent and spans V. Then do G-S on V and you find that you lose an element of the set, so there you have it.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#2
Oct27-04, 08:50 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,898
I think what you mean to say is "prove that the subspace consisting of all vectors v such that <v, x>= 0 (where x is non-zero) has dimension dim(V)- 1."
Select a basis for V containing x and perform a "Gram-Schmidt" starting the process with x as the first vector (so Gram-Schmidt will give a basis containing one basis vector in the same direction as x).
theFuture
theFuture is offline
#3
Oct27-04, 11:35 PM
P: 80
That's definitely what I meant, but I copied it verbatim from my crappy book (Messer's Linear Algebra) starting with "show the vector . . ." It's good with proofs, not so good with the math.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Gram-Schmidt problem - I'm stuck Linear & Abstract Algebra 9
Gram–Schmidt process Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
help with gram schmidt and T*! Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Gram Schmidt Linear & Abstract Algebra 2
Gram-Schmidt Process Calculus & Beyond Homework 1