Is It Immoral to Take a Quarter from the Tray for a Phone Call?

  • Thread starter Thread starter False Prophet
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ethical implications of taking a quarter from a "take a penny/leave a penny" tray at a convenience store to make an important phone call. Participants explore the morality of this action, considering various perspectives on courtesy, intention, and the nature of the tray's purpose.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the morality of taking a quarter, suggesting it may be against the intended purpose of the tray, which is to help others avoid carrying excess pennies.
  • Others argue that if the original donor of the coins intended to help strangers, then taking a quarter for a necessary phone call could be justified.
  • One participant emphasizes that the importance of the phone call may influence the ethical considerations, suggesting that urgency could alter the moral implications.
  • Another viewpoint posits that courtesy rather than morality is the primary concern, comparing the action to other common social behaviors that may be seen as inconsiderate.
  • Some participants highlight that the situation might not be as straightforward as it seems, with factors like the presence of others in line and the necessity of the phone call complicating the ethical landscape.
  • A later reply suggests that if the quarter is crucial for personal success, such as a job interview, it may not be viewed negatively by others.
  • One participant proposes that the enjoyment derived from taking the quarter could outweigh the potential benefit to another person, framing the action as a logical decision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on whether taking the quarter is immoral. Multiple competing views remain, with some arguing for the action's justification based on necessity and others emphasizing courtesy and the tray's intended purpose.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying interpretations of morality and courtesy, as well as differing assumptions about the intentions behind leaving coins in the tray. The ethical implications are influenced by the specific circumstances of the phone call and the presence of other customers.

False Prophet
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
At the convenient store there is a take a penny/leave a penny tray. In it are two quarters. You buy all your stuff but you have only one quarter change, and you really need to make an important phone-call. The nearest payphone is across the street at the gas station and it costs fifty cents. Is it immoral* to take a quarter from the tray to make the call?

*Immoral: Demonstrating lack of goodness and correctness in action/behavior; not virtuous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since when do people leave quarters in the penny tray? :confused: Do you not understand what purpose the penny tray serves?

- Warren
 
I saw it today, at the cafeteria in my office building. I've seen it before elsewhere too. If you haven't seen it before, just try to visualize two quarters in the tray for the purpose of the question.
 
The ostensible purpose of the penny tray is to help people avoid having a pocketful of nearly-worthless pennies.

I'd say it's not very nice to use the contents of the penny tray for a purpose other that intended. If you empty out the penny tray for your phone call, the guy behind you in line won't get to benefit from it. It's not very courteous. Neither is cutting off other drivers on the road, or playing music too loudly in an apartment. Courtesy and morality are not directly related, though.

- Warren
 
If the intended purpose is to get rid of extra change, then wouldn't taking out any change for any reason be against it's purpose. If the person who left the two quarters just didn't want them, and never cared where they wound up (he could have just as easily thrown them in the sewer) and there is nobody behind me in line, is it still immoral to use the quarter for a phone call? The intended purpose of whoever left the coins is probably to help some stranger he'll never see, and I really need this help to make the phone call (as opposed to paying for my items at this establishment). Does the morality of the action depend on what the coin donor wanted the coins used for?

I understand that this is not a very high magnitude ethical example, and taking the quarter isn't necessarily a one way ticket to hell, but I've really been thinking all day about how this plays into my concept of morality.
 
hmnn

that would just depend on how "important" the phone call is, also if you had a dollar bill couln't you just ask the guy behind the counter to change it for you?
 
1) The person who discarded the coins DID care where they wound up. That's why they put them in the tray, not in the sewer.

2) There is always someone behind you in line.

3) If you really need to make a phone call, why are you buying something at the store in the first place? Use that money for the necessary phone call.

4) I don't think it's really a moral issue; it's just a courtesy issue. Surely, you wouldn't say a driver is immoral for cutting another off in traffic.

- Warren
 
theriddler876 said:
that would just depend on how "important" the phone call is, also if you had a dollar bill couln't you just ask the guy behind the counter to change it for you?
Let's say the call is really important, and I don't have any dollar bills.

chroot:

1)Good Point. Most likely his intention was to help a stranger, right?

2)Not necesarilly. Maybe the store is going out of business.

3)I'm buying engine coolant. My low coolant light came on while driving around lost trying to find a specific building for a job interview. I need to call the job prospect and let them know I'll be late because I couldn't find their building, hopefully I can still get the job. If I don't buy the coolant my car could stall, and I would never make it to the interview. After I buy the coolant I have only 25 cents left and I need that other quarter for the call.

4)I would probably cut people off too driving quickly to get to the interview. It is an issue of courtesy, you're right, but I'll wedge into the lane as quickly as possible and maybe cut someone off, the whole time thinking that my destination is so much more important than the other motorist's, but I'll give that thank you wave and use my turn signal nonetheless.

Under these circumstances would using the quarter for the phone call be wrong?
 
False Prophet said:
At the convenient store there is a take a penny/leave a penny tray. In it are two quarters. You buy all your stuff but you have only one quarter change, and you really need to make an important phone-call. The nearest payphone is across the street at the gas station and it costs fifty cents. Is it immoral* to take a quarter from the tray to make the call?

*Immoral: Demonstrating lack of goodness and correctness in action/behavior; not virtuous.
:biggrin: Sure, take the quarter. Its not immoral. Next time you go back to that store just drop twentyfive pennies in that tray. (take a quarter,leave twentyfive pennies).
 
  • #10
If the quarter really comes down to a matter of personal success or massive failure, as in your job interview example, I don't think anyone would think badly of you for taking the quarter. It's obviously a fabricated situation, though. It's not very worthwhile to argue generalities ("is taking a quarter bad?") with extreme examples like that.

- Warren
 
  • #11
The quarter is a resource avaliable to be used. Will the enjoyment you get from taking the quarter and using it be more than the next person who would've used it, probably. I would discern the taking of the quarter to be a perfectly logical move. Your action was probably a good deed in my mind. What the quarter provided you could result in something bigger, like you being happier, then you could make someone else happy by the contagious nature of your improved mood.

Perception on the issue using the above logic could vary depending on mathematical perspective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
9K