New Reply

hamming metric

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May25-11, 12:23 PM   #35
 

hamming metric


yes, so one of x_k is 0 then?
May25-11, 12:25 PM   #36
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
So, did you figure out why

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}<1[/tex]

if one of the xk is 0?
May25-11, 12:29 PM   #37
 
Isn't it because that means the sum above is the difference of two other sums?
May25-11, 12:30 PM   #38
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Metric_Space View Post
Isn't it because that means the sum above is the difference of two other sums?
I'm not sure what you mean. Which other sums?
May25-11, 12:32 PM   #39
 
one that sums to one, and one that has a zero at the kth entry?
May25-11, 12:35 PM   #40
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Yes, indeed!

So, now we have shown that only (1,1,1,...) has the property that

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}=1[/tex].

So, can you now describe the ball around (0,0,0,...) with radius 1?
May25-11, 12:40 PM   #41
 
Would it be all entries are 1? But it wouldn't be finite...would it?
May25-11, 12:46 PM   #42
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Metric_Space View Post
Would it be all entries are 1? But it wouldn't be finite...would it?
No, this isn't correct. I want you to find the set

[tex]\left\{(x_1,x_2,x_3,...)~\mid~\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}<1\r ight\}[/tex]

So...
May25-11, 12:52 PM   #43
 
Isn't that just all the (x_1,x_2, ...) minus the entry with (1,1,1,1...)?
May25-11, 12:58 PM   #44
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Indeed, so the ball around (0,0,0,...) with radius 1 is everything except (1,1,1,1,...).
So, now the obvious generalization: what is the ball around [itex](a_1,a_2,a_3,...)[/itex] with radius 1?
May25-11, 01:04 PM   #45
 
would it be everything but (a_1,a_2, a_3, ...)?
May25-11, 01:10 PM   #46
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Uuh, no, I get the impression that you're just guessing here.

Obviously a=(a1,a2,a3,...) will be in the ball, since d(a,a)=0<1.
Moreover, we have just calculated that the ball around (0,0,0,...) is everything but (1,1,1,...). Thus (0,0,0,...) is in the ball...
May26-11, 07:16 PM   #47
 
...I think I'll need another hint
May26-11, 07:23 PM   #48
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
For what sequence [itex](x_n)_n[/itex], does

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{|x_k-a_k|}{2^k}}=1[/tex]

It's basically the same as my last question (when the ak were simply 0). What must hold for |xk-ak| in order for the above series to be 1?
May26-11, 07:33 PM   #49
 
|X_k-a_k| --> 0 as k--> infinity?
May26-11, 07:44 PM   #50
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Metric_Space View Post
|X_k-a_k| --> 0 as k--> infinity?
No. I don't know how you got that?
You do know that [itex]\frac{1}{2^k}|X_k-a_k|\rightarrow 0[/itex], but I fail to see how it is relevant here...
May26-11, 07:51 PM   #51
 
Oh...does |X_k-a_k|=1 for k=1..infinity?
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: hamming metric
Thread Forum Replies
Hamming Disatnce General Math 1
The Hamming Disatance Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Hamming Coder Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0
Hamming Distance Linear & Abstract Algebra 9
Hamming Code Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 1