
#1
Jun811, 01:33 PM

P: 91

Hi, I'm doing a calculation in which I have a small parameter [tex]\epsilon[/tex] floating around, and I want to automatically remove terms of order [tex]\epsilon^2[/tex] and higher. Is this possible to do?




#2
Jun811, 01:43 PM

P: 2,070

Sure! Just use:
Series[Expression,{epsilon,0,1}]. this will expand Expression in a power series about epsilon=0, and only keep terms up to order 1. If you use Normal[Series[Expression,{epsilon,0,1}]], that will get rid of the annoying O(epsilon^2) terms floating around. 



#3
Jun811, 02:23 PM

P: 91

Thanks!! One more question. Lets say I had something like
[tex] \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2 \varepsilon & 1\varepsilon \\ 1+\varepsilon & 1+2 \varepsilon \end{array} \right) [/tex] How could I retain the multiplicative terms but ditch the additive terms, so that this simplifies to [tex] \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2 \varepsilon & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{array} \right) [/tex] 



#4
Jun811, 02:52 PM

P: 2,070

"Small" quantities in mathematica
What you're asking doesn't make sense to me. In the upper left you kept the multiplicative term (2 epsilon) and not the additive term (0), while in the upper right you kept the additive term (1) and not the multiplicative term ( epsilon). What do you want to do exactly? If you can specify precisely what you want to do, we can program the computer to do it.




#5
Jun811, 04:50 PM

P: 91

Right, sorry. What I want to do is say that epsilon is small compared to some other number, in this case 1, but to keep epsilon finite.
[tex] 0 < \varepsilon << 1 [/tex] Therefore, 1 + 2epsilon is ROUGHLY 1. So the first matrix above simplifies under this approximation to the second one. EDIT: Hmmm, actually, I don't think the power series expansion is quite what I'm looking for. I'd like to have [tex] f(x) = \sqrt{x^2 + \varepsilon + \varepsilon^2} \simeq \sqrt{x^2 + \varepsilon} [/tex] since terms of eps^2 are very small compared to terms of power eps, but x is comparable to epsilon for small enough x. Unless I'm very confused a power series expansion in epsilon will not give me this. Any thoughts would be appreciated. 



#6
Jun1111, 11:48 AM

P: 972

Perhaps you can adapt something like this
In[1]:= {{2ξ,1ξ},{1+ξ,1+2ξ}}/.{x_+_*ξ>x,x_+ξ>x} Out[1]= {{2 ξ,1},{1,1}} Or perhaps In[2]:= Sqrt[x + ξ + ξ^2] /. ξ^2 > 0 Out[2]= Sqrt[x + ξ] Limit[expression,ξ>0] won't do what you want and I can't think of a single simple pattern substitution that will do all and only the things you want in all the kinds of expressions that someone could come up with. With any pattern matching in particular and any Mathematica result in general you should carefully check the results to make sure there are no errors 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix?  Computers  14  
Which quantities are "naturally" forms, and which are (multi)vectors?  Differential Geometry  3  
[SOLVED] "Killing vectors and conserved quantities"  General Physics  0  
"Principia Mathematica" worth "reading"?  Math & Science Software  16  
general "quantities in chemical reactions" questions  Chemistry  2 