New Reply

Product of Two Levi-Civita Symbols in N-dimensions

 
Share Thread
Jul3-11, 01:37 PM   #1
 

Product of Two Levi-Civita Symbols in N-dimensions


Dear You,

In N-dimensions Levi-Civita symbol is defined as:

\begin{align}
\varepsilon_{ijkl\dots}=
\begin{cases}
+1 & \mbox{if }(i,j,k,l,\dots) \mbox{ is an even permutation of } (1,2,3,4,\dots) \\
-1 & \mbox{if }(i,j,k,l,\dots) \mbox{ is an odd permutation of } (1,2,3,4,\dots) \\
0 & \mbox{otherwise}
\end{cases}
\end{align}



I found the following expression for the product of two Levi-Civita symbols when there are no dummy indices (i_1,...,i_n,j_1,...,j_n are in {1,...,n}):

\begin{align}& \varepsilon_{i_1 \dots i_n} \varepsilon^{j_1 \dots j_n} = n! \delta^{j_1}_{[ i_1} \dots \delta^{j_n}_{i_n ]} &&\\& \end{align}

But I could not find its proof through literature and also I was failed to prove it!

Can you please help me? Thanks!

Best Regards,
Ali
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Jul4-11, 04:18 PM   #2
 
When [itex]N=2[/itex] we have for example [itex]\varepsilon_{12}=+1[/itex]. Now, you didn't define [itex]\varepsilon^{12}[/itex] for us. Also, is there some Einstein summation convention in effect here?
Jul5-11, 10:18 AM   #3
 
Firstly, notice that the RHS is antisymmetric in exchange of any pair of the i's and any pair of the j's. So all you have to check is that you get the right answer for [itex]i_1=1, i_2=2, \ldots[/itex] and the same for the j's, which is straightforward.
Jul6-11, 01:54 PM   #4
 

Product of Two Levi-Civita Symbols in N-dimensions


### REPLY TO g_edgar ###

Hi,

Many thanks for your reply!

Assume that the array [itex]K_{ijk}[/itex] (i,j,k are in {1,2,3}) is defined in such a way that [itex]K_{ijk}=\varepsilon_{ijk}[/itex]. It can be shown that, this array behave as a tensor under covariant and contravariant coordinate transformations. In other words:

\begin{align}
\varepsilon_{ijk}=\varepsilon^{ijk}
\end{align}

Also this is the case for N-dimensional:

\begin{align}
\varepsilon_{ijklm\dots}=\varepsilon^{ijklm\dots}
\end{align}

And regarding to the second part of your question: There is no Einstein summation notation in effect here. In fact there is no summation in this statement.

Many thanks for your reply and your attention.

Ali
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Product of Two Levi-Civita Symbols in N-dimensions
Thread Forum Replies
Levi Civita Classical Physics 1
Levi Civita Tensor in 4D Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
Levi-Civita connection Differential Geometry 2
Levi-Civita connection Differential Geometry 0
Integrating Levi-Civita Advanced Physics Homework 0