Product of Two LeviCivita Symbols in Ndimensionsby akoohpaee Tags: levicivita, ndimensions, product, symbols 

#1
Jul311, 01:37 PM

P: 3

Dear You,
In Ndimensions LeviCivita symbol is defined as: \begin{align} \varepsilon_{ijkl\dots}= \begin{cases} +1 & \mbox{if }(i,j,k,l,\dots) \mbox{ is an even permutation of } (1,2,3,4,\dots) \\ 1 & \mbox{if }(i,j,k,l,\dots) \mbox{ is an odd permutation of } (1,2,3,4,\dots) \\ 0 & \mbox{otherwise} \end{cases} \end{align} I found the following expression for the product of two LeviCivita symbols when there are no dummy indices (i_1,...,i_n,j_1,...,j_n are in {1,...,n}): \begin{align}& \varepsilon_{i_1 \dots i_n} \varepsilon^{j_1 \dots j_n} = n! \delta^{j_1}_{[ i_1} \dots \delta^{j_n}_{i_n ]} &&\\& \end{align} But I could not find its proof through literature and also I was failed to prove it! Can you please help me? Thanks! Best Regards, Ali 



#2
Jul411, 04:18 PM

P: 608

When [itex]N=2[/itex] we have for example [itex]\varepsilon_{12}=+1[/itex]. Now, you didn't define [itex]\varepsilon^{12}[/itex] for us. Also, is there some Einstein summation convention in effect here?




#3
Jul511, 10:18 AM

P: 160

Firstly, notice that the RHS is antisymmetric in exchange of any pair of the i's and any pair of the j's. So all you have to check is that you get the right answer for [itex]i_1=1, i_2=2, \ldots[/itex] and the same for the j's, which is straightforward.




#4
Jul611, 01:54 PM

P: 3

Product of Two LeviCivita Symbols in Ndimensions
### REPLY TO g_edgar ###
Hi, Many thanks for your reply! Assume that the array [itex]K_{ijk}[/itex] (i,j,k are in {1,2,3}) is defined in such a way that [itex]K_{ijk}=\varepsilon_{ijk}[/itex]. It can be shown that, this array behave as a tensor under covariant and contravariant coordinate transformations. In other words: \begin{align} \varepsilon_{ijk}=\varepsilon^{ijk} \end{align} Also this is the case for Ndimensional: \begin{align} \varepsilon_{ijklm\dots}=\varepsilon^{ijklm\dots} \end{align} And regarding to the second part of your question: There is no Einstein summation notation in effect here. In fact there is no summation in this statement. Many thanks for your reply and your attention. Ali 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Levi Civita  Classical Physics  1  
Levi Civita Tensor in 4D  Linear & Abstract Algebra  1  
LeviCivita connection  Differential Geometry  2  
LeviCivita connection  Differential Geometry  0  
Integrating LeviCivita  Advanced Physics Homework  0 