.Solving the Time Travel Paradox: An Explanation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the time travel paradox, particularly focusing on the implications of time dilation as described by the twin paradox. Participants explore the effects of relative motion on the perception of time between observers in different frames of reference, questioning the nature of aging and time travel in theoretical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the confusion surrounding the twin paradox, noting that both the observer on Earth and the astronaut perceive the other's clock as ticking slower, leading to questions about who is actually older upon reunion.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the paradox arises from the fact that the two observers are never in the same frame of reference while traveling at constant speeds, which complicates comparisons of aging.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the astronaut's experience of acceleration during the journey is crucial for determining the aging difference, as standard formulas for time dilation do not apply during acceleration.
  • One participant references experimental evidence from particle accelerators that supports the time dilation effect, questioning how this aligns with the perception of time from different reference frames.
  • Another participant clarifies that the observation of time dilation effects is possible because observers are not in the same reference frame as the particles being studied.
  • A question is raised about whether time travel is impossible due to the inability to achieve light speed and the differences in time frames experienced by observers.
  • One participant distinguishes between time dilation experienced during high-speed travel and the concept of time travel, suggesting that the former does not equate to the latter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of time dilation and the twin paradox, with no consensus on the nature of time travel or the resolution of the paradox. Some agree on the mechanics of time dilation, while others challenge the interpretations and implications of these effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexities of comparing aging between different frames of reference, particularly during acceleration, and the limitations of applying standard time dilation formulas in such scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring theoretical physics, particularly concepts related to relativity, time dilation, and the philosophical implications of time travel.

AVNguyen
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have a unclear problem about time travel:
As you all know,when a spaceship move pass Earth with the speed nearly c, the observer will regconise that the watch on the spaceship is moving slower than his own clock.
However, to the astronaunt who is on the spaceship, what he saw is the Earth is moving away from the Spaceship,therefore he has to experinence that the clock on the Earth has to be slower than his own.However, that's not correct according to the twin paradox because it'll be impossible to say which one is older.
I have an explanation that using the Doppler effect, you will have different time for the astronaunt and the obsever.Suggest that at time t the spaceship sends a light signal to the Earth and it bounces back to the spaceship after it traveled a distance x.To the obsever,he has traveled a distance y.Because c is a constant,therefore,x/t1(t1 is the time for the spaceship to cover that distance) has to be the same as y/t2(t2 is the time for the Earth to cover that distance).Assume that x>>y because the speed of the spaceship is closer to C, i will have t1>>t2.That is wrong but i can't correct it myself.
Please give your comment
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AVNguyen said:
However, that's not correct according to the twin paradox because it'll be impossible to say which one is older.

It's hard to follow your example that you propose after this statement, but I have to point out that your summary of the situation is correct...an observer on Earth will contest that the rocket's clock is ticking slower than his own, and an observer in the rocket will contest that Earth's clock is ticking slower than his own. This IS in fact correct, but you say that it's not.
 
My problem is if each observer experiences other's clock slowing down so how come time travel can be true.At least in theory because their clocks are both slowing down therefore, how can one tells who is older after the astronaunt finishes his journey and return home.Evereybody knows that he will be younger than his brother,but if his brother clock actually slowing down in his observation, it means that his brother who is younger,not him.
 
AVNguyen said:
My problem is if each observer experiences other's clock slowing down so how come time travel can be true.At least in theory because their clocks are both slowing down therefore, how can one tells who is older after the astronaunt finishes his journey and return home.Evereybody knows that he will be younger than his brother,but if his brother clock actually slowing down in his observation, it means that his brother who is younger,not him.

As long as the "astronaut" continues traveling at a constant speed relative to the "stay at home", yes, each observes the other as aging more slowly than himself. That's not a "paradox" nor even a problem- they are never in the same "frame of reference".

In order that they be able to compare their ages in the same frame, we must have that "the astronaunt finishes his journey and return home" he must accelerate and so the "standard formulas" (that assume constant relative speed) no longer apply. Roughly speaking, it is the astronaut, who undergoes the acceleration, that will age slower.
 
But in practice, we know that the twin paradox has been checked by using the accelerator to build up particles speed and we can observe some particles which life is very short becomes longer enough for us to notice and make some records.If we are in the same frame as the short life particle, how can we observe that phenomena.Obviously, we can observe the particles life become longer, but in their observation,will our lives become longer too?
 
AVNguyen said:
How can we observe that phenomena?
Because we are not in the same reference frame as the particle. Relative to us, the particle undergoes a rapid acceleration that we don't experience. This places us outside its reference frame.
 
So as you say that can i understand that time travel is impossible not only because we can't achieve the speed of light but also because the diferrence between each other's time frame?
 
What do you mean by "time travel"? If you get in a rocket ship and move away from Earth very fast and then turn around and come back, you will have aged less than the rest of us when you land. Actually, even if you just go to the bathroom while your friends stay on the couch watching TV, you will have aged less than them when you get back. I wouldn't call this time travel. It's just time dilation.
 
Thank you i see what you mean.
 
  • #10
Make sure to keep asking questions if you don't understand something, AVNguyen. Coo? Coo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
14K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K