A question about the relationship between light and time.

In summary: So the question for me relates to the relationship between a mass-less particle and space time.Is the effect mentioned due to the speed a photon moves through space time or is it because a photon has no mass and therefore does not interact with space time? (And the speed is irrelevant in that respect?)Yes, the speed is what is important.
  • #1
rede96
663
16
I don’t’ have any background in physics and SR/GR is something I became very interested in just over the last few years. Most of the concepts I seem to get, but I have not engaged with the math to any great extent.

The one thing that keeps cropping up for me is the relationship between light and time. I don’t know what the correct way is to put this, but as I understand it, photons do not travel through time.

I found one of the most useful ways for me to conceptualise this was a post from DaveC426913 here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1684890&postcount=20"

So the question for me relates to the relationship between a mass-less particle and space time.

Is the effect mentioned due to the speed a photon moves through space time or is it because a photon has no mass and therefore does not interact with space time? (And the speed is irrelevant in that respect?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
rede96, Photons certainly do travel through time. What's confusing you perhaps is trying to imagine what it's like to ride on a photon. "What time does the photon experience" is meaningless. Time is measured in a rest frame, and is different for every rest frame. Never mind "the rest frame of the photon" - there isn't any. Photons do not carry pocket watches.
 
  • #3
Bill_K said:
rede96, Photons certainly do travel through time.

Hi Bill, Yep, that is confusing me because I read so many contradictory things. It would nice to clear that one up!

Bill_K said:
What's confusing you perhaps is trying to imagine what it's like to ride on a photon. "What time does the photon experience" is meaningless. Time is measured in a rest frame, and is different for every rest frame. Never mind "the rest frame of the photon" - there isn't any. Photons do not carry pocket watches.

Yes I understand that too. So to make it clear I am not trying to look at time or anything else from a photons point of view. That is not my question.

However, I can see that asking questions like mine can be very confusing, so perhaps I can ask it in a different way.

If you move relative to me, I can measure time dilation and length contraction.

My question would be:

Is it the fact that we have mass and are moving relative to each other through space time that cause this effect? Or is it simply the speed that we are moving relative to each other in space time that causes the effect? And mass, for the purposes of time dilation etc, is irrelevant?

How I would see it is:

You are in a rocket ship moving at speed x relative to me and your ship has double the rest mass of mine. I measure the time dilation.

I see someone else in their rocket ship moving at the same speed x relative to me and I know that their ship has the same rest mass as mine. So I assume that I would measure the same time dilation as I did for your ship.

So mass may limit our ability to ‘move’ particularly at c, but it is not directly responsible for the effects mentioned.

So…

It would be the speed that a photon travels at through space time that would cause any of the differences we may observe relative to us (Can’t think of a better way to put that.) Not the fact that it was mass-less.
 
  • #4
rede96, Yes you've got it. The effects we talk about in special relativity, time dilation and length contraction among them, are only geometrical effects caused by the relative speed between us. People often mistakenly try to attribute them to some physical property such as the mass of the ship, or try to imagine what would cause an atom to really contract, or a clock to really slow down. But those effects are a feature of the space we live in, not the objects themselves.
 
  • #5
rede96 said:
So the question for me relates to the relationship between a mass-less particle and space time.

Is the effect mentioned due to the speed a photon moves through space time or is it because a photon has no mass and therefore does not interact with space time? (And the speed is irrelevant in that respect?)

Yes, it's the relative motion that matters, as already pointed out. However, here's the thing ...

Relative motion only has meaning from the POV of material entity. The ability to perceive the passage of time has much to do with the ability to be held at a state of rest, which of course requires rest mass (not effective mass). We assign the origin of a coordinate system as the reference for measurements, including for motion. Coordinate system origins exist at a specific point in space at a specific time, because it's the nature of rest mass to exist as such ... and it matters not if the body is imagined or real, because imagined bodies assume the rest mass exists. So while it requires only relative motion (under the context of invariant light speed) to produce relativistic effects, relative motion only has meaning (in the first place) per the POV of rest mass. They are mutually linked concepts.

GrayGhost
 
  • #6
Bill_K said:
rede96, Yes you've got it. The effects we talk about in special relativity, time dilation and length contraction among them, are only geometrical effects caused by the relative speed between us.

Thanks Bill. I wouldn't say I've completely got it yet :) but maybe I'm on the right track.

I still find it difficult grasp that it is purely geometrical effects caused by the relative speed between two frames and not the result of geometrical effects moving relative to space-time, and when we move relative to another frame, it is the net result of those two movements that we measure.

However, I know that would suggest that there is an absolute rest frame.

Anyway, more for me to think about. :)
 
  • #7
GrayGhost said:
The ability to perceive the passage of time has much to do with the ability to be held at a state of rest, which of course requires rest mass (not effective mass). We assign the origin of a coordinate system as the reference for measurements, including for motion. Coordinate system origins exist at a specific point in space at a specific time, because it's the nature of rest mass to exist as such ... and it matters not if the body is imagined or real, because imagined bodies assume the rest mass exists. So while it requires only relative motion (under the context of invariant light speed) to produce relativistic effects, relative motion only has meaning (in the first place) per the POV of rest mass. They are mutually linked concepts. GrayGhost

Thanks for the reply GrayGhost.

I'd always found it a strange coincidence that if rest mass does not affect time dilation (As long as you have rest mass that is) and it is purely a geometrical effect, then why is it that the speed where time dilation no longer applies is the speed c, the speed of a particle with no mass.

Even though I don't fully understand the relationship, I guess from what you are saying is that just had to be, as they are mutually linked concepts. (Forgive the poor terminology.)
 

1. How does light affect time?

Light and time have a complex relationship. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, time and space are intertwined and affected by the speed of light. This means that the faster an object moves, the slower time moves for that object. So, light moving at its maximum speed of 299,792,458 meters per second, causes time to slow down.

2. Can light travel through time?

No, light cannot travel through time. While light can travel at incredible speeds, it always moves forward in time. It cannot move backwards or jump ahead in time.

3. How does the speed of light affect the measurement of time?

The speed of light is used as a constant in many scientific equations, including those used to measure time. This means that the speed of light is essential in our understanding and measurement of time. Without knowing the speed of light, we would not be able to accurately measure time.

4. How is the speed of light related to the concept of a "light year"?

A light year is a unit of measurement used to describe the distance light travels in one Earth year. Since light travels at a constant speed, this distance is always the same. It is approximately 9.46 trillion kilometers or 5.88 trillion miles. So, the speed of light is directly related to the concept of a light year.

5. Does time exist without light?

Time is a fundamental part of the universe and exists independently of light. However, light plays a crucial role in our perception and measurement of time. Without light, we would not be able to see the changes happening around us and therefore, our concept of time would be different.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
695
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
74
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
924
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
1K
Back
Top