Find Distance Between Spherical Polar & Cartesian Points

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spherical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance between points given in spherical polar coordinates and Cartesian coordinates. Participants explore methods for conversion and the application of distance formulas in both coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks if converting Cartesian coordinates to spherical polar coordinates is necessary to calculate the distance between two points.
  • Another participant suggests that visualizing the points may help, but converting to spherical coordinates is a good step for distance calculations.
  • A formula for distance in spherical coordinates is provided, highlighting its complexity compared to the Cartesian formula.
  • Confusion arises regarding the spherical polar representation of a point on the z-axis, with participants discussing the correct angles and representations.
  • One participant clarifies the polar representation of a point on the z-axis based on its distance and sign.
  • Participants discuss the process of squaring the distance formula and simplifying it, with one noting the interchange of angles in their notation.
  • There is a discussion about simplifying the squared distance expression and its relation to the unit sphere equation.
  • One participant arrives at a distance formula and expresses it in terms of a triple integral over a sphere, seeking confirmation of its correctness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and confusion regarding the conversion between coordinate systems and the simplification of distance formulas. No consensus is reached on the best approach or the correctness of the derived formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with angle definitions and the complexity of the distance formula in spherical coordinates. There is uncertainty about the simplification steps and the representation of points in different coordinate systems.

MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have two points, one given in spherical polar coordinates and the other in cartesian coordinates. If I want to work out the distance inbetween these points do I need to convert the cartesian into spherical polars?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless you happen to be able to visualize these things in your head, then yes, writing the point in sphericals in cartesian coords would seem like a good step, especially as distance is usually calculated in terms of cartesion coordinates.
 
the formula for the distance between two points in spherical coordinates is:

[tex]d^2=r_1^2+r_2^2-2 r_1 r_2(sin\theta_1 sin\theta_2 cos\phi_1 cos\phi_2 + sin\theta_1 sin\theta_2 sin\phi_1 sin\phi_2 + cos\theta_1 cos\theta_2)[/tex]

obviously, the cartesian formula is a lot simpler.
 
Okay so I have point P with spherical polar coordinates
[tex](R, \theta , \phi)[/tex]
and point A with cartesian coordinates
[tex](0, 0, a)[/tex]

so A is just the z axis with length a? so in spherical polars:

A is [tex](a, 0, 0)[/tex] ? or maybe [tex](a, \theta, \phi)[/tex] ?

Im getting confused!
 
With [tex]\theta[/tex] being the angle in the horizontal plane, whereas [tex]\phi[/tex] the angle to the z-axis, a given point at distance abs(a) ("a" itself either positive or negative) on the z-axis has the polar representation:
[tex](abs(a),\theta,\frac{\pi}{2}(1-sign(a))[/tex]
where sign(a) is 1 when a is positive or -1 when a is negative.
 
Thanks, I've now worked out:

[tex]x = r\sin\theta\cos\phi , y = r\sin\theta\sin\phi, z = r\cos\theta[/tex]

I'll see how far I can get now!
 
Note:
In your notation, the angles are interchanged from how I've used them!
 
Yeah, sorry forgot to mention that I had interchanged them.

So now I have two points in cartesian coordinates:

P [tex](R\sin\theta\cos\theta , R\sin\theta\sin\phi , R\cos\theta)[/tex]

A [tex](0, 0, a)[/tex]

In order to work out the distance AP do I need to square that awful looking thing?!
 
Yep, that's what you need to do.
 
  • #10
Okay so I need:

[tex](R\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + (R\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + (R\cos\theta)^2[/tex]

How can I simplify this? In a book I have it just sets a "similar" expression equal to 1 with no intermediate steps:

[tex](\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + (\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + (\cos\theta)^2 = 1[/tex]

Also this has no 'R' in it.

edit: sorry had theta where there should have been phi
 
Last edited:
  • #11
MathematicalPhysics said:
Okay so I need:

[tex](R\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + (R\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + (R\cos\theta)^2[/tex]

How can I simplify this? In a book I have it just sets a "similar" expression equal to 1 with no intermediate steps:

[tex](\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + (\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + (\cos\theta)^2 = 1[/tex]

Also this has no 'R' in it.

edit: sorry had theta where there should have been phi

Did you notice that
[tex](R\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + (R\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + (R\cos\theta)^2[/tex]
[tex]=R^2(\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + R^2(\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + R^2(\cos\theta)^2[/tex]
[tex]= R^2((\sin\theta\cos\phi)^2 + (\sin\theta\sin\phi)^2 + (\cos\theta)^2[/tex])
?
 
  • #12
Yeah, I've got the distance AP to be

[tex](R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)^(1/2)[/tex]

which I think is correct?

Now writing the triple integral of AP over the sphere R less than or equal to a in terms of spherical polar coords gives:

[tex]\iiint {\sqrt(R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)} R^2 \sin\theta\,dR\,d\theta\,d\phi[/tex]

with the integration over R between 0 and a
the integration over [tex]\theta[/tex] between 0 and pi
the integration over [tex]\phi[/tex] between 0 and 2pi

correct so far?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K