How to Find Geodesics on a Curved Surface Using Calculus of Variations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding geodesics on a curved surface, specifically using spherical polar coordinates and the calculus of variations. Participants explore the formulation of the integral that represents the length of a path on a sphere and the application of the chain rule in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the process of finding the shortest path (geodesic) on a sphere and presents an integral for the length of the path in spherical coordinates.
  • Another participant suggests using the chain rule to differentiate the coordinates, providing a formula for dx and dy in terms of r, φ, and θ.
  • A subsequent reply presents specific expressions for dx and dy but indicates difficulty in transforming these into the desired form for the integral representing the geodesic length.
  • Another participant clarifies that the length of a curve in three dimensions involves the square root of the sum of the squares of the differentials and provides the correct expressions for x, y, and z in spherical coordinates.
  • This participant also notes that since the path is constrained to a sphere, dr equals zero and the radius is constant, leading to a simplified expression for the integral of the geodesic length.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to finding the geodesic length using spherical coordinates, but there is some uncertainty regarding the application of the chain rule and the manipulation of differentials.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the differentiation of the coordinates and the specific handling of the differentials dr and dφ in the context of the integral.

matpo39
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
hi, we have just got to the point in my physics course where Newtons laws are now longer that easy to work with anymore and we are now beginning to reformulate those using variational methods, and I am a little confused on one of the problems.
The shortest path between two points on a curved surface, such as the surface of a sphere is called a geodesic. To find a geodestic, one has first to set up an integral that gives the length of a path on the surface in question. Use sperical polar coordinates (r,theat,phi) to show that the length of a path joining two points on a shere of radius R is L=R*integral(from theta_1 to theta_2)sqrt(1+sin^2(theta)*(phi_prime(theta))^2)*d(theta)

if (theta_1,phi_1) and (theta_2,phi_2) specify two points and we assume that the path is expressed as phi=phi(theta).

I know how to do this problem if it were just (x,y) it would be L=integral(from x_1 to x_2) ds, where ds= sqrt(dx^2+dy^2)= sqrt(1+y_prime(x)^2) dx
but I am getting confused on how to implement the spherical polar cords. For example x=r*sin(phi)*cos(theta), but then i don't know what dx would be because I am not sure what to differantiat?

thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use chain rule...

[tex]dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial r}dr+\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi}d\phi+\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}d\theta[/tex]

same with [itex]dy[/itex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: joaosodre8
ok i used the chain rule and came up with these values for my dx and dy

dx= cos(theta)sin(phi)*dr+r*cos(theta)cos(phi)*d(phi) - r*sin(theta)sin(phi)*d(theta)

dy= sin(theta)cos(phi)*dr-r*sin(theta)sin(phi)*d(phi)+r*cos(theta)cos(phi)*d(phi)

I then put those dy,dx values into the equation

ds=Sqrt(dx^2+dy^2) but i still can't get it to look like

L= R integral(from theta_1 to theta_2) (sqrt(1+sin^2(theta)*phi_prime(theta)^2)*d(theta)

also how would the dr,d(phi) work themselves out so all that would be left is the d(theta)?
 
Ok.. first of all, you are in 3 dimentions so the length of a curve is given by

[tex]L=\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}{\sqrt{{dx}^2+{dy}^2+{dz}^2}}[/tex]

now, given the spherical coordinates

[tex]x=r\cos\phi\sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]y=r\sin\phi\sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]z=r\cos\theta[/tex]

you have that

[tex]{dx}^2+{dy}^2+{dz}^2={dr}^2+r^2\sin^2\theta{d\phi}^2+r^2{d\theta}^2[/tex]

but you are over a sphere right? so [itex]dr=0[/itex] and [itex]r=R[/itex]

using all this we have

[tex]L=R\int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}{\sqrt{\sin^2\theta{d\phi}^2+{d\theta}^2}}=R\int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}{\sqrt{\sin^2\theta{\left(\frac{d\phi}{d\theta}\right)}^2{d\theta}^2+{d\theta}^2}}[/tex]

so

[tex]L=R\int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}{\sqrt{1+\sin^2\theta{\left(\frac{d\phi}{d\theta}\right)}^2}d\theta}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K