Understanding Limits: A Method for Evaluating Complex Limits Without Operations

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of a complex expression as \( x \) approaches infinity, specifically without using standard limit operations. Participants explore methods to arrive at the conclusion that the limit is \( \sqrt{3} \), while adhering to constraints on the techniques allowed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the limit problem and notes a straightforward solution using standard operations, which they cannot use due to instructional constraints.
  • Another participant outlines three rules for evaluating infinite limits based on the powers of the numerator and denominator, suggesting that these rules can be applied to the given limit.
  • A different participant expresses that they are restricted to using the definition of limits and sequence characterization, seeking clarification on the steps to prove the limit is \( \sqrt{3} \) without using the aforementioned rules.
  • Further, a participant suggests using the \( \epsilon-\delta \) definition to validate the suspected limit, while acknowledging the complexity of applying it directly in this context.
  • Another participant proposes using \( N \) instead of \( \epsilon \) for limits approaching infinity and outlines a method to apply the definition of the limit to the function defined in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods allowed for evaluating the limit. Some propose using established rules, while others insist on adhering strictly to the definition of limits and sequence characterization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take under the given constraints.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations based on instructional guidelines, which restrict the use of standard limit operations and require reliance on definitions and characterizations of limits. This creates a complex environment for exploring the evaluation of the limit.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I am asked to evaluate this limit

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sqrt{3x^2+11x+7}+\sqrt{3x^2-11x+7}}{x+\sqrt{x^2+7}}[/tex]

but without use of the basic operations on limits (ex: the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits if they exist, etc.) (because they are to be introduced only in the next chapter). I know the limit is very easily computed: just divide the numerator and the denominator by x and the answer is [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex]:

[tex]= \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sqrt{3+\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}+\sqrt{3-\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}}{1+\sqrt{1+\frac{7}{x^2}}} = \sqrt{3}[/tex]

But what is the "method" to arrive to this conclusion? The facts that

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{11}{x} = 0[/tex]

and that

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{7}{x^2} = 0[/tex]

are useless if we cannot use the operations on limits. I hope I made clear where my confusion comes from. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 3 rules of infinite limits:

1. If the power of the top is the same as the power of the bottom, take the coefficients:

[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac {4x^2 + 3x + 7}{2x^2 + 2x + 1} = \frac {4}{2}=2[/tex]

2. If the power of the bottom is larger than the power of the top, the limit is zero:

[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac {x^2 + 4x}{x^3 + 7x} = 0[/tex]


3. If the power of the top is larger than the power of the bottom, the limit does not exist:

[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac {x^3 + 3x - 7}{x^2 + 4x} = dne[/tex]

I don't think these are operations; they are just facts. In your case:

[tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sqrt{3x^2+11x+7}+\sqrt{3x^2-11x+7}}{x+\sqrt{x^2+7}} [/tex]

the top and bottom are only to the power [tex]x^1[/tex] and so you take the coefficients, [tex]\frac {\sqrt{3}}{1}=\sqrt{3}[/tex] Hopefully this helps you.
 
I'm afraid I'm not allowed to use your rules. Only the definition of limit, the caracterisation with sequences and a few theorems about the unicity and the "limit to the right, limit to the left" caracterisation.

Let me ask the question another way: What are the steps between

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sqrt{3+\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}+\sqrt{3-\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}}{1+\sqrt{1+\frac{7}{x^ 2}}}[/tex]

and

[tex]= \sqrt{3}[/tex]

I tought of something this morning, could it be it? Now that we suspect using our "sense" that the limit is [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex], we may use the [itex]\epsilon-\delta[/itex] definition to prove that it is indeed [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex]. But I don't really see how. :shy:
 
quasar987 said:
I'm afraid I'm not allowed to use your rules. Only the definition of limit, the caracterisation with sequences and a few theorems about the unicity and the "limit to the right, limit to the left" caracterisation.

Let me ask the question another way: What are the steps between

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{\sqrt{3+\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}+\sqrt{3-\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}}{1+\sqrt{1+\frac{7}{x^ 2}}}[/tex]

and

[tex]= \sqrt{3}[/tex]

I tought of something this morning, could it be it? Now that we suspect using our "sense" that the limit is [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex], we may use the [itex]\epsilon-\delta[/itex] definition to prove that it is indeed [itex]\sqrt{3}[/itex]. But I don't really see how. :shy:
Right, but because you're taking the limit as x goes to infinity, not zero, I would tend to use "N" rather than epsilon.

To save space, let

[tex]f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{3+\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}+<br /> \sqrt{3-\frac{11}{x}+\frac{7}{x^2}}}<br /> {1+\sqrt{1+\frac{7}{x^ 2}}}[/tex]

To apply the definition directly, what you need to do is assume you have a value for delta, and then solve for N in the equation:

[tex]f(N) - \sqrt{3} = \delta[/tex]

And once you've done that, you need to show that

[tex]x > N \Rightarrow |f(x) - \sqrt{3}| < |f(N) - \sqrt{3}|[/tex]

It looks likely to get messy, which, if nothing else, illustrates why we don't generally work directly from the definition of the limit.
 
Great, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K