Taylor Series/Radius of Convergence - I just need a hint

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivGradCurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Taylor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Taylor series expansion of a polynomial function and the determination of its radius of convergence. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the radius of convergence, initially believing it to be finite based on their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the radius of convergence using a specific form of the Taylor series and expresses confusion over the results compared to their textbook.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights suggesting that the original poster's understanding of the coefficients and the nature of the series may be flawed. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of convergence tests appropriate for polynomials, indicating that the series converges for all x.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's calculations seem to be based on an incorrect assumption about the coefficients of the series, leading to a misunderstanding of the radius of convergence. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the properties of polynomial functions in relation to convergence.

DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Consider the following:

[tex]f(x) = 1 + x + x^2 = 7 + 5 (x-2) + (x-2)^2[/tex]

which is a Taylor series centered at 2. My question is: what is the radius of convergence? The answer in my book is [tex]R=\infty[/tex], but take a look at this:

[tex]f(x) = 7 + 5 (x-2) + (x-2)^2 = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} b_n (x-2)^n \Longrightarrow \left| x-2 \right| < 1[/tex]

Then, I get

[tex]1 \leq x \leq 3 \Longrightarrow R = \frac{3-1}{2}=1 \neq \infty[/tex]

In other words, I'm a bit confused!

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your confusion is that the [itex]b_n[/itex] are ALL 0 for n > 2. There's nothing to test since the series is perfectly well defined for all x. You might try, for example, comparing the terms in your series with the terms in a series you know converges for all x such as [itex]e^{-x^2}[/itex]. Clearly, for n > 2 each term of your series is smaller than the corresponding term in the latter expansion.
 
It looks like you tried to use the ratio test, but you can't because you need to find the limit of 0/0.

However, you can apply the n-th root test, which will, indeed, say that it converges for all x. (as it should because the function is a polynomial which exists for all x!)
 
It makes sense now.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K