What is the maximum force on the vine during Tarzan's swing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zlex
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving Tarzan swinging from a vine. The problem requires determining the maximum force exerted on the vine during the swing, given Tarzan's weight, the length of the vine, and the height of descent. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically energy conservation and forces in motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore energy conservation principles and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy. There are attempts to apply equations of motion and forces acting on Tarzan during the swing. Some participants express confusion regarding the assumption of the vine's elastic properties and question the lack of provided information about the spring constant.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their reasoning and calculations. Some have identified potential errors in their approaches and are seeking clarification on the assumptions made regarding the vine's properties. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the application of forces and energy conservation, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific information about the vine's elasticity and the spring constant, which complicates the problem. There is also mention of the need to consider both the weight of Tarzan and the tension in the vine during the swing.

Zlex
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure that this question isn't as hard as I'm making it, but I'm having a brain block here.

Tarzan, who weighs 700 N, swings from a cliff at the end of a convenient vine that is 17 m long. From the top of the cliff to the bottom of the swing, he descends by 5.3 m. The vine will break if the force on it exceeds 1580 N. What would the greatest force on the vine be during the swing?

I'll show you guys how far I've gotton and then maybe you can help me from there, or show me where I am mistaken

Emech(initial) = Ep + Ek
Emech(initial) = mgh
Emech(initial) = 700*5.3
Emech(initial) = 3710

Emech(final) = Ep + Ek
Emech(final) = Es + Ek
Emech(final) = (kx^2)/2 + (mv^2)/2

*We can assume Emech is conserved

3710 = (kx^2)/2 + (mv^2)/2

kx^2 + mv^2 - 7420 = 0

Also I know that

F= m*a
F=mv^2 / R

And,
kx^2 + mv^2 - 7420 = 0
v^2 = (7420 -kx^2) / m

F = 7420-kx^2 / R
F = 7420-kx^2 / 17

Also,

Fmax = kx
1580 = kx
1580/x = k

Sub into F = 7420-kx^2 / 17

F = (7420 - 1580x) / 12

And thusly I am stuck.

Too many unknowns, not enough equations.

:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(kx^2)/2 ?

Is this vine a spring?
 
gnome said:
(kx^2)/2 ?

Is this vine a spring?

Its's not a spring, but it does unfortunately have elastic properties. I really wish it didn't, the problem would be much easier.

Took me about 20 minutes of getting the answer wrong and wondering why they told me Fmax before I figured that out though.

When I realized it I thought I had solved the problem, only to realize I had gained two variables and only one equation.

=\

Now I am even more frustrated.
 
Just a question...how do you know that you are meant to assume that the vine has elastic properties? If the author intended for students to consider them, you would think he/she would give the elastic spring constant k, in the problem, as well as a statement that the elastic restoring force of the vine can be described by Hooke's law. It doesn't say so anywhere...?
 
yea, I would also think that the book would specify that to you...
 
cepheid said:
Just a question...how do you know that you are meant to assume that the vine has elastic properties? If the author intended for students to consider them, you would think he/she would give the elastic spring constant k, in the problem, as well as a statement that the elastic restoring force of the vine can be described by Hooke's law. It doesn't say so anywhere...?

Alright; perhaps you are right. I've done the problem for the case where the rope is not elastic however I get an incorrect answer.

Maybe you can show me where I went wrong.

[tex]Et_i = E_p +E_k[/tex]

[tex]Et_i = E_p +0[/tex]

[tex]Et_i = mgh[/tex]

[tex]Et_i = 700(h)[/tex]

[tex]Et_i = 3,710[/tex]

*Assume no energy lost

[tex]Et_f = E_p +E_k[/tex]

[tex]Et_f = 0 +\frac{mv^2}{2}[/tex]

[tex]3,710 = \frac{mv^2}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{7420}{m} = v^2[/tex]

[tex]F=ma[/tex]

[tex]F=\frac{mv^2}{R}[/tex]

[tex]F = \frac {m \frac{7420}{m}}{R}[/tex]

[tex]F = \frac {7420}{17}[/tex]

[tex]F = 436.47N[/tex]
 
It is sum of forces = ma

I assume u have the free body diagram drawn for when tarzan is at the bottom

then sum of the forces is not F, but :

T - W

where T is the tension and W is tarzans weight.
 
Oh man. Thank you so much, alright so then the last step would be:

[tex]\sum{F} = F_t - W[/tex]
[tex]\sum{F} = F_t - 700[/tex]
...
[tex]436.47 + 700 = F_t[/tex]
[tex]F_t = 1136.47[/tex]

Which...is so damn right.

Thank you so much. I can't believe it was such a stupid mistake. :smile:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K