Clock Synchronization: How to Measure Photon Velocity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter juju
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Synchronization
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the challenges of synchronizing clocks for the purpose of measuring the one-way speed of light, particularly in the context of testing Einstein's second postulate of special relativity (SR) without assuming its validity. Participants explore various methods and implications of clock synchronization and the assumptions involved in such measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to synchronize clocks at two locations without assuming the validity of special relativity, highlighting the inherent challenges in making one-way measurements of photon velocity.
  • Another participant draws an analogy to the twin paradox, suggesting that synchronization is complicated by the effects of acceleration and relative motion, which can lead to different readings when clocks are brought back together.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the ability to adequately test aspects of special relativity, suggesting that many tests rely on assumptions that are themselves rooted in relativity.
  • A proposed method for synchronizing clocks involves sending a signal to reset them, but this method is challenged on the grounds that it assumes the speed of light is the same in both directions.
  • Another participant suggests that the initial synchronization pulse is necessary to establish a zero difference baseline, but acknowledges that changes in relative velocity due to Earth's rotation could affect the measurements.
  • There is a suggestion to use a counter to measure the time difference between the arrival of signals from the two clocks to achieve higher resolution in the measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of synchronizing clocks without assuming aspects of relativity. There is no consensus on a definitive method for achieving this synchronization or on the implications of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities and assumptions involved in clock synchronization, particularly in relation to the speed of light and the effects of relative motion. Limitations in the proposed methods and the dependence on specific assumptions are acknowledged but remain unresolved.

juju
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have been thinking that in order to actually prove Einstein's second postulate of SR about the speed of light (and SR in general) you need to make a one-way measurement of the velocity of individual photons. To do this the clocks at the two ends of the path have to be synchronized. My question is how do you synchronize these clocks without assuming the second postulate (or other parts of SR) is true in the first place.

juju
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of each clock as a a twin, in the famous twin "paradox". The clocks keep proper time in their own rest frames. And the point of the twin story is that even if they are synchronized at one moment in the same frame, their subsequent travels over curved world lines (i.e.accelerations) will cause them to read differently when they are brought back together. And when they are apart, you can't have them synchronized at all, either they are matched at different times and relative speeds (by radio or light signals) and so they tell different times by Lorentz transformations, or else they are spacelike related in which case the concept of simultenaity, necessary for synchronization, simply does not exist.
 
Hi SelfAdjoint,

The conclusion I am tempted to deduce is that many aspects of special relativity cannot actually be tested adequately because they require the assumption of certain other aspects of relativity for their test.

juju
 
juju said:
Hi SelfAdjoint,

The conclusion I am tempted to deduce is that many aspects of special relativity cannot actually be tested adequately because they require the assumption of certain other aspects of relativity for their test.

juju


Only if you define naive experiments :biggrin:

There have been thousands of experiments supporting the Lorentz transformations, and from the Lorentz transformations you can deduce the rest of relativity.
 
Hi,

OK, then. How do I synchronize two clocks, 10 miles apart, in order to measure the one way speed of light on the surface of the earth. Do this without assuming any part of relativity.

juju
 
At noon time you take two clocks 10 miles apart. At some point in between the two clocks near the middle you send a signal to both clocks and reset them. The clocks then send signals to you and arrive at your location together after the reset. As the Earth turns the pulse of one clock should arrive before the other and reach a maximum difference around midnight. As the Earth returns to noon at your location the clocks should again agree. If you see a difference then the one way speed of light is different.
 
Hi 4Newton,

Doesn't sending the original signal to reset the clocks assume that the speed of light in both directions is the same, and is not the same true of the first signal that you get from the clocks.

juju
 
Hi juju:
Doesn't sending the original signal to reset the clocks assume that the speed of light in both directions is the same, and is not the same true of the first signal that you get from the clocks.
The reason to send the first sync pulse is to remove all differences in the system at the start. This gives you a starting point of zero difference for the velocity you are moving on the Earth at the start. As your relative velocity changes as the Earth rotates the pulses should change if the one way path of light changes.

To have higher resolution you can start a counter time base when one pulse is received and stop counting when the other pulse is received. You may accumulate this count over any time period to achieve the resolution desired.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K