Register to reply 
Resolution of vectors 
Share this thread: 
#1
Sep2511, 04:30 PM

P: 335

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Revered members, i have attached two images which depicts obtaining an expression for velocity and acceleration of particle executing SHM. 2. Relevant equations In the first attachment, velocity component vcos[itex]\Theta[/itex] is parallel to vertical diameter of the circle and vsin[itex]\Theta[/itex] is perpendicular to the vertical diameter. In the second attachment, acceleration component vcos[itex]\Theta[/itex] is perpendicular to vertical diameter and vsin[itex]\Theta[/itex] is parallel to vertical diameter. 3. The attempt at a solution I know perpendicular component is sine and parallel component is cosine. But i cant understand why perpendicular component to vertical diameter is taken as cosine in acceleration expression and parallel component as sine? Please help revered members, with regard to guidelines for resolving vectors in cosine and sine components. 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution 


#2
Sep2611, 12:12 AM

P: 315

Hi dude,
Let's take the first picture first. Look at the arrow marked v. Look at the direction it's pointing and what angle it makes with OY. You'll see what they say is correct. Feel free to ask questions if what I'm saying is not clear. 


#3
Sep2611, 03:43 PM

P: 335

Omoplata,
Thanks for the reply. I dont understand what you say. My doubt is, the perpendicular line PN is taken as vsin[itex]\Theta[/itex] in measuring velocity The same perpendicular line PN is taken as cosine component that is v^{2}cos[itex]\Theta[/itex]/a in measuring acceleration. Why the component changes from sine to cosine wrt to first and second diagram? 


#4
Sep2611, 08:24 PM

P: 315

Resolution of vectors
That's because the velocity vector is perpendicular to the line PO, and acceleration vector lies along (is parallel to) the line PO.
i.e., the velocity vector is tangential to the circle at point P, while the acceleration vector points to the center of the circle from point P. So velocity and acceleration vectors are perpendicular to each other. 


#5
Sep2711, 06:17 PM

P: 335

Thanks for the reply, omoplata. Agreed, velocity and acceleration vectors are perpendicular to each other. But PN is perpendicular to ON, so it should be sine component, Why it is taken as cosine component in the second attachment, i.e acceleration measurement?



#6
Sep2711, 09:11 PM

P: 315

Because the angle between the acceleration vector and PN is [itex]\theta[/itex], and the angle between the acceleration vector and ON is [itex]\pi/2  \theta[/itex].



#7
Sep2711, 11:43 PM

P: 335

90  [itex]\Theta[/itex] should be the sine component. Am i right?



#8
Sep2711, 11:59 PM

P: 315




#9
Sep2911, 04:56 PM

P: 335




#10
Nov2411, 07:32 PM

P: 315

Hi logearav. I was looking at my old posts and found that I haven't replied to this one. I must have forgotten. Sorry.



#11
Nov2711, 10:37 PM

P: 335

Thanks for your kind gesture omaplata. I understood now.



#12
Nov2711, 10:40 PM

P: 335

Omaplata, one more doubt. Why vsinθ has no effect in measurement of velocity? Only vcosθ has been taken into account. It has been mentioned since vsinθ is perpendicular to the vertical diameter, it has no effect. I dont understand. Could you clarify?



#13
Nov2711, 11:17 PM

P: 315

They are just saying that the component of the velocity perpendicular to the vertical diameter, has in turn no component parallel to the vertical diameter. So if you change the component of the velocity perpendicular to the vertical diameter, that has no effect on the component of the velocity parallel to the vertical diameter.
As for WHY that happens, I suppose that is a property of the Euclidean vector spaces. The unit vectors of the basis making up a Euclidean vector space are orthogonal to each other. As for why THAT happens, you'll have to ask someone who knows more than me. My current understanding of Euclidean 3D space is pretty much intuitive and not that rigorous. I can only help you understand it with an example. Suppose a boat is crossing a river which is perfectly straight and has a constant width (the edges of the river are parallel to each other). The boat crosses the river perpendicular to these edges. That is, it does not move upstream or downstream as it crosses the river. No matter how fast the boat crosses the river, it will not move upstream or downstream. In other words, the speed of the boat, which is perpendicular to the river, will have no effect on its speed upstream or downstream, which is zero (Take the velocity of the boat here to be the perpendicular component of the velocity). 


#14
Nov2911, 11:16 PM

P: 335

Thanks omoplata. I raised this query in many forums but i could not get any satisfactory reply. Now with your example, i clearly understood the concept. Persons like you are an asset to this forum. Thanks a lot for your valuable help.



#15
Nov3011, 12:17 AM

P: 315

Well, thank YOU for the interesting question.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Resolution Vectors Question?  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
Ask in Experiment Resolution of Vectors  Advanced Physics Homework  2  
Position Vectors, Velocity Vectors, and Acceleration Vectors  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
What does position resolution (in %) mean? Is a low percentage better?  General Physics  2  
STM resolution  Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics  1 