Thread Closed

No "debunking" Gods of Science

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct1-11, 06:01 PM   #1
 

No "debunking" Gods of Science


How is it that criticisms of any of the Gods of Science, such as Carl Sagan, is not tolerated here? How is that?

Someone mentioned the Sagan Boloney Detector, and I copied the term and commented on it, and pow, thread destroyed.

It's somewhat like 1984 where everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.
Nobody is more equal than Gods of Science, such as Carl Sagan.

Science is not so advanced by pretensions of infallible grandeur.

Oh yes, some of his worshipers would claim "Carl is not around any longer to defend himself."
But if Carl were still alive, he assuredly would not be browsing around this place anyway, so that argument and its corollaries are utterly fatuous.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved
>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change
>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
Oct1-11, 06:27 PM   #2

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
I saw your thread and it was silly. The forum censors incoherent, meaningless rantings. It doesn't censor criticism of popular figures (although actually they do when it's just plain crude). Your thread was the former. You just picked a random personality, decided on your own that he is seen as some sort of superhuman character in physics, complained about it, and then with no evidence to support your own claims, challenged everyone else to prove yourself wrong. That kind of garbage doesn't fly around here.
 
Oct1-11, 06:37 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Pengwuino View Post
I saw your thread and it was silly. The forum censors incoherent, meaningless rantings. It doesn't censor criticism of popular figures (although actually they do when it's just plain crude). Your thread was the former. You just picked a random personality, decided on your own that he is seen as some sort of superhuman character in physics, complained about it, and then with no evidence to support your own claims, challenged everyone else to prove yourself wrong. That kind of garbage doesn't fly around here.
+1 on that
 
Oct1-11, 06:52 PM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

No "debunking" Gods of Science


Quote by Pengwuino View Post
I saw your thread and it was silly. The forum censors incoherent, meaningless rantings. It doesn't censor criticism of popular figures (although actually they do when it's just plain crude). Your thread was the former. You just picked a random personality, decided on your own that he is seen as some sort of superhuman character in physics, complained about it, and then with no evidence to support your own claims, challenged everyone else to prove yourself wrong. That kind of garbage doesn't fly around here.
+1 too. Go peng!!
 
Oct1-11, 08:31 PM   #5
Evo
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
He's a previously banned crackpot.
 
Oct1-11, 08:33 PM   #6
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Evo View Post
He's a previously banned crackpot.
Hurray for evo!!!!
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: No "debunking" Gods of Science
Thread Forum Replies
In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix? Computers 14
Debunking a "debunkment" Forum Feedback & Announcements 8
Difference between "Identical", "Equal", "Equivalent" Calculus & Beyond Homework 9
Why "Gods" exsistence will not ever be answered? General Discussion 1