Infinite Energy Through Extradimensions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of extradimensions and the possibility of infinite energy sources, particularly in relation to accelerating to the speed of light and the role of biological quantum wormholes. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, including multiverse theories and M-theory, while questioning the feasibility of extracting energy from such dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose the existence of a dimension of infinite energy that could be utilized for acceleration to the speed of light, while others express skepticism about the feasibility of such a concept.
  • There is a suggestion that if the multiverse theory is correct, it implies the existence of infinite dimensions, although some participants clarify that each dimension may have a finite amount of energy.
  • One participant argues that while there may be potential energy sources in alternate dimensions, extracting energy would likely require a significant input, possibly negating the benefits.
  • Another participant questions the definition of "communicate" in the context of multiverses, suggesting that quantum computing could potentially interact with these multiverses.
  • Discussions about the relationship between multiverse theories and Hilbert spaces reveal differing interpretations, with some asserting that they are unrelated concepts.
  • Participants discuss the implications of M-theory and the nature of branes, suggesting that they may allow for interactions between different universes.
  • Concerns are raised about the impossibility of achieving infinite energy and the limitations of quantum wormholes in generating such energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the existence of infinite energy or the implications of multiverse theories. Some participants agree on the speculative nature of these ideas, while others challenge the feasibility and definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of empirical evidence for the existence of infinite energy and the speculative nature of multiverse theories. The discussion also highlights the complexity of definitions and interpretations related to quantum mechanics and theoretical physics.

jimmy1200
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
is it possible that there could exist a dimension of infinite energy that we could use as a source to accelerate to the speed of light and could biological quantum wormholes provide us with an extradimensional source of infinite energy somewhere. are there any theories on an extradimension of infinite energy for everyone or for each individual atom. so I am still learning and just throwing things out there.

thanks for any answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is it possible that there could exist a dimension of infinite energy

Possible? Anything is possible unless proved otherwise. However, there is no evidence for any such thing.
 
If the idea of the multiverse is correct then supposedly there are infinite dimensions (or is it?), though each has a finite amount of energy, supposedly.
 
The idea of multiverse has (as far as I know) no connection with the idea of infinite dimensions. Multiverse idea seems to be related to M theory (current upgrade of string theory) which has 11 dimensions (10 space + time).
 
If you're lookling for ideas for a story, something to consider to make it plausible: (Warning: entering fantasy).

My philosophical understanding of the cosmos is that, while there may be all sorts of places for potential energy sources to reside, that doesn't mean they're free for the taking. There tends to be a cost in energy to extract it, often a large fraction of the amount you get. For example, fusion requires a very large input of energy to pass the "hump" where you get more out than you put in.

If there were an alternate dimension with infinite energy, you couldn't just stick a faucet in it and drain it off. You'd need to overcome a huge barrier, using a huge amount of energy.

If that weren't the case, it would be happening naturally and spontaneously all the time.



P.S. I don't know what a biological quantum wormhole is, but it sounds like a poultice and salve would do the trick.
 
well i guess i should have said, "a source so big that it appears to be infinite, and could we be wrong about the amount of energy it takes to excel to "c". could it just be that the energy to get to "c" is so large that it appears to have to take an infinite amount of energy and when i say biological quantum wormholes, i mean a biological source within our bodies that would cause quantum wormholes or do now cause quantum wormholes.
 
You're right, I've misphrased what I was saying. Replace 'dimensions' with universes and that is what I was saying.

M-Theory is the combining of the different string theories (there are 5 and M-theory is the one that is connecting them).

The multiverse is different, though I'm not intelligent enough to given the explanation it's due.
 
Infinite energy is non-existent. There is nothing that is infinite in the physical world; this is because infinity doesn't exist as a number. I may sound like a fool, but when we (physicists) say [tex]x=\infty[/tex], others (mathematicians) frown on us, because what we actually mean is [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}[/tex].

The multiverse also cannot work because we do not and cannot communicate with another multiverse. The multiverse idea is an interpretation of quantum mechanics, meaning that it has no empirically testable facts. So whatever you interpret QM as, it cannot have an effect on physical measurements.

Quantum wormholes do not generate infinite energy, if the wormhole exists for a shorter and shorter time, then there can be a larger and larger energy difference. To actually get to infinity, you'd have to have a wormhole that exists for zero time, which doesn't make sense. And finally, it is impossible for any massive body to attain the speed c in any inertial reference frame, and impossible for any massless body to change from c in any inertial reference frame.
 
The multiverse also cannot work because we do not and cannot communicate with another multiverse

Define communicate.

As people like Deustch have speculated when a quantum computer is running calculations it is actually doing it in these multiverses (others say Hilbert space). On top of that it's been said that if you were able to build a quantum computer with an appropriate AI you could ask it where it was doing these calculations and if the idea of the multiverse was valid.

Would any of these qualify as 'communicate'

While these ideas are all rather far fetched and difficult to swallow they are not beyond the realms of the laws of quantum mechanics as we know it.

Just thinking.
 
  • #10
The multiverses aren't separate parts of Hilbert spaces; they are fairly unrelated concepts. The state vector [tex]|\psi\rangle[/tex] doesn't have any meaning unless we qualify with the space it inhabits, and that is the Hilbert space. The multiverse idea is saying that whenever a measurement is made, which would require the wavefunction to collapse from [tex]|\psi\rangle[/tex] to [tex]|\psi_1\rangle[/tex] from the possible set [tex]\left{|\psi_i\rangle\right}[/tex] according to the Copenhagen interpretation, instead we say that there are [tex]i[/tex] multiverses, and the one we are in happens to be the one such that [tex]i=1[/tex].

But if you seem to know what Hilbert spaces are, I would tell you that the eigenstates are linearly independent and the qubit is only a superposition. The linear independence assures that what happens in one "multiverse" doesn't affect the other.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
The multiverses aren't separate parts of Hilbert spaces

I didn't say that.

Also, relax, you know more than me, I'm willing to admit that without a formal challenge.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Multiverse idea is a concept of science (physics or cosmology), i.e. with the 7 extra dimensions in M theory, there are other physical universes. This has nothing to do with Hilbert space which is a purely mathematical concept, essentially an infinite dimensional generalization of Euclidean space (which can be n dimensional for any integer n).
 
  • #13
Multiverse acording to the string / M theory information that i have is infinite multidimensional universes surrounded by Branes.

And that these brane covered universes move freely around amoung themselfs. Possibly even touching at times... There is speculation as to what happens at these events.
 
  • #14
In most versions of multiverse theory, each universe is separated by an event horizon, much like a black hole. This keeps them causally separated from one another.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K