Register to reply

Lagrange Multipliers to find max/min values

Share this thread:
arl146
#1
Oct25-11, 03:55 PM
P: 343
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Use Lagange Multipliers to find the max and min values of the function subject to the given constraint(s). f(x,y)=exp(xy) ; constraint: x^3 + y^3 = 16


2. Relevant equations
[itex]\nabla[/itex]f = [itex]\nabla[/itex]g * [itex]\lambda[/itex]
fx = gx * [itex]\lambda[/itex]
fy = gy * [itex]\lambda[/itex]


3. The attempt at a solution
Set the fx and fy eqns equal to 0. but i cant solve for x, y, and lambda... i guess my algebra isnt that strong

i got fx = [itex]\lambda[/itex] * gx
y*exy = 3x2[itex]\lambda[/itex]

and for y:

x*exy = 3y2[itex]\lambda[/itex]

and g(x,y) = x3 + y3 = 16
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Security CTO to detail Android Fake ID flaw at Black Hat
Huge waves measured for first time in Arctic Ocean
Mysterious molecules in space
arl146
#2
Oct25-11, 05:32 PM
P: 343
no one can offer a little help? =/
I like Serena
#3
Oct25-11, 06:26 PM
HW Helper
I like Serena's Avatar
P: 6,187
Hi arl146!

You need to solve this set of equations:
(1) y exy = 3x2λ
(2) x exy = 3y2λ
(3) x3 + y3 = 16

Can you find λ from equation (1)?
And also from equation (2)?
Then equate them to each other, effectively eliminating λ?

HallsofIvy
#4
Oct25-11, 07:41 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,346
Lagrange Multipliers to find max/min values

Since a specific value for [itex]\lambda[/itex] is not necessary for the solution, I find it is often simplest to start by eliminating [itex]\lambda[/itex] by dividing one equation by another. Here, start by dividing [itex]ye^{xy}= 3x^2\lambda[/itex] by [itex]xe^{xy}= 3y^2\lambda[/itex]: [itex]y/x= x^2/y^2[/itex] which is the same as [itex]x^3= y^3[/itex]. Putting that into [itex]x^3+ y^3= 16[/itex] gives [itex]2x^3= 16[/itex].
arl146
#5
Oct26-11, 12:52 AM
P: 343
well i sorta did something like that and got and y=x and with the whole x^3 + y^3 = 16 that means y=x=2. so theres what, is it called a critical pt still, at (2,2) ? so i just plug that into f(x,y)= exp(xy) ??
so you'd have f(2,2)=exp(4) .... is that all i do ? it just seems wrong.idk why haha
I like Serena
#6
Oct26-11, 01:41 AM
HW Helper
I like Serena's Avatar
P: 6,187
Yes that's all you do. :)

The only thing remaining is finding out whether it's a maximum or a minimum...
arl146
#7
Oct26-11, 01:58 AM
P: 343
yea i think thats why i came here because i got confused with that one value. how do you know?
I like Serena
#8
Oct26-11, 04:24 AM
HW Helper
I like Serena's Avatar
P: 6,187
Quote Quote by arl146 View Post
yea i think thats why i came here because i got confused with that one value. how do you know?
Doesn't your class material cover that?

Anyway, I know of 3 methods:

1. Using the second derivative test (Hessian matrix).
I can't quickly find a easy example for it (yet).

2. Since you only have one extrema, you can pick any point that satisfies the constraint and calculate f(x,y) there. Compare it with the f(x,y) at the extremum and you know whether it's a maximum or a minimum.

3. Vary x with a small epsilon, and calculate how you need to vary y to match the constraint in first order approximation.
In your case (x + epsilon)^3 + (y - epsilon)^3 = 16.
Check what f(x + epsilon, y - epsilon) does relative to f(x,y).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Lagrange Multipliers: Minimum and Maximum Values Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Lagrange to find eigen values and vectors? Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Lagrange Multipliers Find 3 positive numbers? Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Extreme values (Lagrange multipliers) Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Lagrange Multipliers - unknown values Calculus & Beyond Homework 2