Big Test Prep- Questions (2 of 3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom McCurdy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on an object as it moves from x=0 to x=3X_o, using a force function defined as F=F_0(X/X_o-1). Participants are exploring different methods to approach the problem, including graphical and analytical techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss plotting the force function to find the area under the curve and evaluating the integral analytically. There is also a focus on the interpretation of the force function and its constants.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the integration process and the implications of different interpretations of the force function. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct setup for the problem, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There are questions regarding the notation used for the force function, which may affect the calculations. Participants are also considering the implications of constants F_0 and X_0 in their evaluations.

Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
1
Big Test Prep-- Questions (2 of 3)

Alright we are having a review test and I needed to go back to the stuff we did earlier this year and I am having some trouble remembering what to do...
:shy: how can i forget this stuff you ask... I don't know


The Force exerted on an object is [tex]F=F_0(X/X_o-1)[/tex] Find the work done in movieng the object from [tex]x=0[/tex] to [tex]x=3X_o[/tex]

a. by plotting F(x) and finding the area under the curve and

b. by evaluting the intergral analytically.

Answer: [tex]\frac{3}{2}F_oX_o[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W = int (F(x)dx)

Remember that F0 and X0 are both just constants.
 
If you were to integrate that assuming xo and fo are constants would you not get

FoX(X-Xo)
----------
2Xo
 
Tom McCurdy said:
If you were to integrate that assuming xo and fo are constants would you not get

FoX(X-Xo)
----------
2Xo

Your notation is ambiguous. Is the original force function
[tex]F_0\frac{X}{X_0-1}[/tex]
or
[tex]F_0(\frac{X}{X_0}-1)[/tex]
??
If it is the first, then when X= 3X0, the force is 3F0X0/(X0-1) and when X= 0, it is 0. The area under is the area of a triangle: (1/2)(3X0)(3F0X0/(X0-1)
= 9F0X0/2(X0-1) which is exactly what you would get by integrating.

If it is the second, then when X= 3X0, the Force is 2F0 but when X=0, it is -F0 and the "force graph" has x-intercept at X= X0. Now the "area under the curve" is the area of the triangle with vertices at (X0,0), (3X0,0) and (3X0, 2F0) (which is 2F0X0) minus the area of the triangle with vertices at (X0,0), (0,0) and (0,-F0) which is (1/2)F0X0: work done (2- 1/2)F0X0=(3/2)F0X0. I guess that's the one you meant.

In terms of integration, The work would be the integral, from X= 0 to 3X0, of F0((X/X0- 1) dx. The anti-derivative of that is F0(X2/(2X0)- X). Evaluating that at 3X0 and 0 gives F0((9/2)X0-3X0)= F0(3/2)X0 as before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K