Can a Wind Tunnel Bootstrap Itself?

  • Thread starter Thread starter urbsurfer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of whether a wind tunnel can generate enough lift to lift itself off the ground when an airfoil is mounted inside it, particularly under conditions of high airflow and angle of attack. Participants explore theoretical scenarios and physical principles related to lift generation, airflow dynamics, and control volumes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if a wind tunnel can lift itself by suggesting that if an airfoil generates more lift than the weight of the wind tunnel, it could theoretically lift off the ground.
  • Another participant argues against this idea by using an analogy about lifting oneself by pulling on one's collar, indicating that the mass of the wind tunnel does not contribute to lift.
  • A third participant introduces the concept of a control volume around the wind tunnel, suggesting that a force balance would show no net lift due to horizontal forces at the inlet and outlet, and that the forces acting on the air inside the tunnel counteract any potential lift.
  • This participant also raises a hypothetical scenario about a weightless box, questioning how an airfoil could affect a box that is far away, indicating uncertainty about the implications of distance on lift generation.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of considering the flow dynamics and clarifies that the airfoil can affect the inlet and outlet flow, which could lead to a net lift under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a wind tunnel can lift itself. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the mechanics of lift generation and the role of the wind tunnel's mass and airflow dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions involved in their arguments, particularly regarding the effects of airflow and the mass of the wind tunnel. The discussion includes hypothetical scenarios that complicate the analysis.

urbsurfer
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
A school mate of mine was joking when he said you can lift your wind tunnel up if you mount the airfoil to the sides with the high Angle of attack and fast enough airflow. Is this true? If you have say a rectangular glass wind tunnel (fish aquarium shape) and put a large size wing and fast airflow, will the whole thing lift off the table? Or does the wing push down on the bottom of the air and wind tunnel? Say the wind tunnel weighs 1000 lbs for all parts and you found a airfoil that can make lift of 1100 lbs, will the whole thing lift itself by the bootstraps so to speak?
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
As a good friend of mine always says...

"You can't lift yourself up to the ceiling by pulling on your collar."

However, this analogy does not apply here.

Think about it this way. All you're doing is making flow pass over a wing to generate lift. Consider three cases:

1) A plane is in open air with two wings extending from the cockpit and is propelled by a motor and propeller.

2) This same plane is surrounded by a box extending from its wingtips up and down and connecting above and below the cockpit, but is still driven by the motor and propeller.

3) The plane in 2) has the motor put in front of the box and the propeller at the front open edge of the box.

These three cases are the same. Airflow is being passed over a wing to generate lift on the vehicle. It doesn't matter from where the airflow is generated.

Now, why don't we see ducted planes flying around. First, the box (or test section) is mass that doesn't contribute to the lift. Second, the box would stifle airflow near it making the tips of the wings less efficient. And third... there is no third, the first two make it so inefficient as to be impractical. However, it is theoretically possible that with a light enough test section and a powerful enough (and light enough) motor that such an airship would be possible.

Cheers...
 
Control Volume

Consider this: Put a control volume around the wind tunnel, with the boundary on the OUTSIDE of the tunnel. Now do a force balance on it. At the inlet and outlet, I would assume there would be only horizontal forces. For the sides of the box, as well as the top and bottom of the box, there would be no forces. Now, the net force on the box can be seen to be zero. The box would not lift up.

So although it would seem the box around an aircraft should still fly, I doubt this is true given the above. The problem I see is the forces and momentum change of the air going over the wing are counteracted on the inside of the box.

I'm 99% convinced this is a reasonable argument, though what bothers me would be a counter suggestion of "what about a large, weightless box?" ie: if large enough, how could the wing have any affect on the box many miles away? Good question!
 
Q_Goest said:
Consider this: Put a control volume around the wind tunnel, with the boundary on the OUTSIDE of the tunnel. Now do a force balance on it. At the inlet and outlet, I would assume there would be only horizontal forces.
Just to clarify: The way the question is worded sounds like we shouldn't assume the inlet and outlet flow is horizontal. The airfoil inside a tunnel can affect the inlet and outlet flow and if it does, the entire tunnel will have a net lift. However, you are right in that real tunnels do have horizonal flow - they have flow vanes to keep the air straight and even until it gets to the test section.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K