How to evaluate int 2x-3y dA using change of variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral \(\iint(2x-3y)\,dA\) using a change of variables defined by \(x=\frac{1}{5}(3u+v)\) and \(y=\frac{1}{5}(2u-v)\). The Jacobian was calculated as \(-\frac{1}{5}\) with integration limits set from \(1 \leq u \leq 2\) and \(2 \leq v \leq 5\). A common mistake noted was the incorrect order of integration limits for \(u\), which should be from \(1\) to \(2\). The final evaluation of the integral resulted in a negative value, which is acceptable given the context of the integral's bounds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with change of variables in integration
  • Knowledge of Jacobian determinants
  • Basic concepts of bounded regions in the Cartesian plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jacobians in coordinate transformations
  • Practice evaluating double integrals using different change of variables
  • Explore the implications of negative values in integrals
  • Learn about bounded regions and their significance in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and multivariable integration techniques, as well as educators teaching these concepts.

AeroFunk
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Let R be the region bounded by the graphs of x+y=1, x+y=2, 2x-3y=2, and 2x-3y+5. Use the change of variables:
[tex] x=1/5(3u+v)[/tex]
[tex]y=1/5(2u-v)[/tex]
to evaluate the integral:
[tex] \iint(2x-3y)\,dA[/tex]

I found the jachobian to be -1/5
and the limits of integration to be
1<=u<=2
2<=v<=5

so i set up the integral like this:
[tex] \frac{-1}{5}\int_{2}^{5}\int_{2}^{1} vdv[/tex]

and I get -21/5 which doesn't seem right(a negitive number??),what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm getting -21/10, but that's just because you forgot a 1/2 in the integration. I am wondering, though, why your bounds of integration on u are going from 2 to 1 instead of 1 to 2, especially since you don't evalute the integral as such.

What's wrong with a negative number? The integral in u-v obviously isn't going to be negative, and the Jacobian is in fact negative, so obviously the answer should be negative. From the x-y integral, we're integrating 2x-3y. If y is sufficiently large compared to x, the integral will be negative, as in this case.

--J
 
Oh sorry the 2 to 1 is just a typo , and lol yea it would be negitive (have been doing to many volume problems lately)

thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K