Is it possible to multiply by 'undefined'?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Moore1879
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of multiplying by 'undefined' in mathematics, particularly in the context of trigonometric functions and algebraic operations. Participants explore the implications of treating undefined values in calculations, questioning the rules and assumptions that govern such operations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that multiplying by undefined is problematic and question whether there are formal rules against it.
  • One participant suggests that if you multiply 1/0 by 0, the result could be interpreted as 1, raising issues about the validity of algebraic operations involving undefined values.
  • Another participant counters that 1/0 multiplied by 0 is actually undefined, as it leads to 0/0, which is also undefined.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of 'undefined' as not being a quantity but rather a quality, indicating that it should not be treated like a real number in equations.
  • A participant proposes a method to avoid undefined values in a trigonometric equation by rearranging it to set one side to zero, suggesting alternative approaches to the problem.
  • One participant draws a parallel to database logic, where 'NULL' is treated similarly to 'undefined', illustrating how it behaves in arithmetic and logical operations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of undefined values in mathematical operations. There is no consensus on whether multiplying by undefined can yield meaningful results, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of such operations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about the nature of undefined values and the rules of multiplication, but these assumptions are not universally accepted. The discussion also reflects a lack of clarity on how to handle undefined in different mathematical contexts.

Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
My trig teacher says that my solution would not work because you can't multiply by undefined. Why can't you? Is there a rule, postulate, etc... that says you can't? If so, what is it? I think that if you multiply by undefined you would get undefined. Is this wrong.

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to think of exact examples. 1/0 would be undefined. Let's assume that algebraic rules do apply to such numbers, and you can multiply by them. What happens if you multiply 1/0 by 0? The 0's would cancel out and you would get 1 as an answer. First of all this is not undefined, as you speculated, but there is also another problem: What happens if you multiply this by 2? 1*2=2, obviously. One property of multiplication is that it has to be commutative, in other words the order in which you perform multiplications does not effect the answer. a*b=b*a and similarly (a*b)*c=a*(b*c).
Apply this to the above example. As we showed
(1/0*0)*2=(1)*2=2
but what happens if we perform the multiplications in a different order?
1/0*(0*2)=1/0*0=1
These answers are not the same, so normal multiplication does not apply to undefined numbers. There are many other such contradictions that can be found. It's similar to the problem of performing algebraic operations on infinity as if it were a number. I'm sure this could have been said much more elegantly, but I'm tired right now. Did this answer your question?
 
Moore1879 said:
My trig teacher says that my solution would not work because you can't multiply by undefined. Why can't you? Is there a rule, postulate, etc... that says you can't? If so, what is it? I think that if you multiply by undefined you would get undefined. Is this wrong.

Thanks for reading.

What would be the point? Undefined is undefined so anything you get would be undefined.
 
Eddo, you said, "What happens if you multiply 1/0 by 0? The 0's would cancel out and you would get 1 as an answer." That is not true. 1/0*0 is not 1. When you multiply a fraction by a whole number, you change the second into a fraction:
1/0*0/1=0/0
0/0 is also undefined; therefore, even 1/0*0 is undefined. So you are wrong.

Tide, you asked me what the point would be? The point is that the teacher said that the only completely correct answer was wrong. This miss leads the class. The question was:

Tan(x)Sec(x)=Tan(x)

What is the general solution for x?
My solution was:

Sec(x)=Tan(x)/Tan(x)
(When you divide anything by itself, you get one of two solutions: +1 and "undefined", so:)=
Sec(x)=+1 or Sec(x)=undef.
x=360n x=90+180n

But, in order for Tan(x)/Tan(x) to equal undef.:
Tan(x)=undef. or Tan(x)=0
x=90+180n x=180n

So, this yeilds three general solutions:
{x=360n,x=90+180n,x=180n}

This can all be condensed into:
{x=90n}
 
Moore, "undefined" is not a quantity. You don't treat is as a quantity on one side or other of an equation.

It is a quality. Something is undefined if it is not defined within some ring.
 
Moore1879 said:
Eddo, you said, "What happens if you multiply 1/0 by 0? The 0's would cancel out and you would get 1 as an answer." That is not true. 1/0*0 is not 1. When you multiply a fraction by a whole number, you change the second into a fraction:
1/0*0/1=0/0
0/0 is also undefined; therefore, even 1/0*0 is undefined. So you are wrong.


You need to be careful telling others they are wrong. Eddo carefully qaulified his statement by saying in effect what if we treat 1/0 as any other real number, and pretend that multiplication worked. Of course 1/0 isn't a real number, so the premise is false, but that isn't the important thing there.

In the real numbers (a/b)*b=a for all a when b is not zero. That is what he was getting at in attempting to explain what "undefined" might mean.
 
Thank you Matt, saved me having to defend myself.

I don't know if you know this already or not Moore, but if you wanted to solve the problem in order to avoid any "undefined"s simply rearrange it so that one side is equal to zero:

tanxsecx=tanx
tanxsecx - tanx=0
tanx(secx - 1)=0 so
tanx=0 or secx=1
 
Moore1879 said:
My trig teacher says that my solution would not work because you can't multiply by undefined. Why can't you? Is there a rule, postulate, etc... that says you can't? If so, what is it? I think that if you multiply by undefined you would get undefined. Is this wrong.

Thanks for reading.

In database environment this makes perfect sense, both for arithmetic and boolean logic.
It uses the special value NULL for all types, which would be equal to 'Undefined'.

Forexample:
NULL or TRUE = TRUE
NULL or FALSE = NULL
NULL and FALSE = FALSE

1 + NULL = NULL
'A' + NULL = 'A' (string concatenate, NULL is them emtpty string)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K