Register to reply

Help with qual problem on Riemann-Stieltjes Integration

by TopCat
Tags: integration, qual, riemannstieltjes
Share this thread:
TopCat
#1
Nov20-11, 08:29 PM
P: 58
Let f:[0, ∞) → ℝ be a decreasing function. Assume that

|[itex]\int^{\infty}_{0}[/itex]f(x)dx| < ∞

Show that

[itex]lim_{x→∞}[/itex]xf(x) = 0.


Attempt:
By hypothesis f is integrable for every b>0, as is the function x, so that for every such b, xf(x) is integrable on [0,b]. From here I tried passing to sums by considering a partition P such that U(P,xf(x)) - L(P,xf(x)) < ε, but I'm probably barking up the wrong tree there. I also can't see a way to use integration by parts to generate an xf(x) term since I don't have differentiability or continuity of f.

I'm pretty much just lost and need a slight nudge in the right direction.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Dick
#2
Nov20-11, 09:47 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
No, integration by parts can't help, for just the reason you mention. lim f(x) as x->infinity has to be zero, right? That should be easy to see. So you can assume lim f(x)>0. Prove it by contradiction. So suppose lim x->infinity x*f(x) is NOT zero. That means there is an e>0 such that for any N>0 there is c such that c*f(c)>e. That should be enough of a slight nudge to get you started.
TopCat
#3
Nov21-11, 01:25 PM
P: 58
Thanks! that was just what I needed.

TopCat
#4
Nov23-11, 11:15 AM
P: 58
Help with qual problem on Riemann-Stieltjes Integration

I thought I was good, but I'm having trouble seeing where the contradiction lies. I expected that maybe I could choose N large so that f(x)<ε, yet x*f(x)>ε, but I can't see how will work. I know that ∫x*f(x) need not converge so there's nothing there. I also looked at the same N large under the same conditions to see if choosing a partition P such that U(P,x*f(x))-L(P,x*f(x))<ε might imply x*f(x)<ε, but that didn't work either. I must be making dunce move and missing something super obvious here. :(
Dick
#5
Nov23-11, 11:30 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Ok, pick a c such that c*f(c)>e. That means the integral of f(x) from 0 to c is greater than e, right? Now pick a c'>2c such that c'*f(c')>e. Can you get a lower bound for the integral from c to c' of f(x)?
TopCat
#6
Nov23-11, 01:06 PM
P: 58
Ah! Got it! I was completely missing out on the fact that f decreasing implies x*f(x) < ∫f dx. Kept focusing too hard on other irrelevant things. Thanks!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Riemann-Stieltjes problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Riemann-Stieltjes Problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Riemann-Stieltjes Integral Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Riemann Stieltjes Integral help! General Math 2
Riemann-Stieltjes, Lebesgue-Stieltjes integration Calculus 4