The Mysterious Name of the Integral Symbol: A Mystery Solved?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the naming and historical context of the integral symbol, particularly its origins and the terminology associated with it. Participants explore the contributions of Leibniz and the symbolic representation of the integral in mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the actual name of the integral symbol and its historical significance. Some explore the connection between the symbol and the concept of summation, while others share personal anecdotes related to its name.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the integral symbol's name and its meaning. Some participants provide insights into its historical context, while others express uncertainty about its nomenclature. There is no clear consensus, but the discussion is lively and engaging.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the relationship between the integral symbol and the Latin and Greek letters, as well as the implications of its connection to summation. There is also mention of external resources that discuss the symbol's origin.

ascky
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
What is the actual name for the integral symbol? I know it was first used by Leibniz, but did he actually call it anything...? It's really hard trying to convince my friends the integral symbol is the sexiest thing ever invented, when I don't even know her true name. :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's called an integral symbol. Sorry to disappoint.

- Warren
 
Grrr... I knew it.
 
Lol - the "sexiest" thing ever invented.
 
My father called it a "sea horse"!
 
It's somthing devious here.If Leibniz invented it,and from what i know the story goes that he wanted to mix the Latin and Greek letters for S,then what would S mean...??My guess is that it would have to do with the sum
[tex]\sum f(x)dx[/tex],since both Riemann and Darboux lived well after Leibniz,right??
:confused:
 
"The symbol [tex]\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx[/tex] reminds us that an integral is a limit of sums (the integral sign is an old-fashioned S) of terms of the form [tex]f(x)[/tex] times a small difference of [tex]x[/tex]."

-Hughes Hallett. calculus, single variable

so the integral sign is an s which stands for "sum"
 
Last edited:
The symbol is also known as a "summa", in reference to its origin -> http://occawlonline.pearsoned.com/bookbind/pubbooks/thomas_awl/chapter1/medialib/custom3/topics/calculus.htm .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 273 ·
10
Replies
273
Views
31K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K