| New Reply |
Show seq. [itex] x_n [/itex] with [itex] |x_{n+1} - x_n| < \epsilon [/itex] is Cauchy |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec5-11, 10:47 AM | #1 |
|
|
Show seq. [itex] x_n [/itex] with [itex] |x_{n+1} - x_n| < \epsilon [/itex] is Cauchy
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The problem is longer but the part I'm stuck is to show that [itex] \{x_n\} [/itex] is convergent (I thought showing it is Cauchy) if I know that for all [itex] \epsilon > 0 [/itex] exists [itex] n_0 [/itex] such that for all [itex] n \geq n_0 [/itex] I have that [itex] |x_{n+1} - x_n| < \epsilon[/itex] 2. Relevant equations A sequence is Cauchy if for all [itex] \epsilon > 0 [/itex] and for all [itex] n,m \geq n_0 [/itex] one has [itex] |x_m - x_n| < \epsilon [/itex] 3. The attempt at a solution I called [itex] m = n+p [/itex] (for [itex] p [/itex] an arbitrary positive integer) Then [itex] |x_m - x_n| = |x_{n+p} - x_n|[/itex] But (and I think there is some mistake here): [itex] |x_{n+1} - x_n| < \epsilon/p [/itex] [itex] |x_{n+2} - x_{n+1}| < \epsilon/p [/itex] [itex] \vdots [/itex] [itex] |x_{n+p} - x_{n+p-1}| < \epsilon/p [/itex] So [itex] |x_{n+p} - x_n| < \underbrace{|x_{n+1} - x_n|}_{< \epsilon/p} + \underbrace{|x_{n+2} - x_{n+1}|}_{< \epsilon/p} + \ldots + \underbrace{|x_{n+p} - x_{n+p-1}|}_{< \epsilon/p} < \epsilon [/itex] Any help on why it's wrong (if it is) and how to solve it correctly? Thanks! |
| Dec5-11, 11:19 AM | #2 |
|
|
This isn't true. For example the sequence
[tex] x_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} 1/i[/tex] |
| Dec5-11, 12:11 PM | #3 |
|
|
I suppose I have to write the full problem: Given [itex] \{x_n\} [/itex] a sequence of real numbers, and [itex] S_n = \Sigma_{n=1}^n |x_{k+1} - x_k| [/itex], with [itex] S_n [/itex] bounded, prove that [itex] \{ x_n \} [/itex] converges. My attempt at a proof: Clearly [itex]\{ S_n \} [/itex] converges as it is a series of positive terms and it is bounded. So I define [itex] a_k = | x_{k+1} - x_k| [/itex], and now I know that [itex] \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = 0 [/itex] (because the series [itex] S_n [/itex] converges). From there I really didn't know how to continue, I thoght proving [itex] x_n [/itex] was Cauchy, but didn't work. Any help? |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Show seq. [itex] x_n [/itex] with [itex] |x_{n+1} - x_n| < \epsilon [/itex] is Cauchy
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Relations between coefficient and exponent of Proth prime [itex]k\cdot 2^n+1[/itex]? | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 2 | ||
| False statement proven by induction? [itex]n \geq a \Rightarrow n! \geq a^n[/itex] | General Math | 5 | ||
| Prove U (Ai X Bi) [itex]\subseteq[/itex] (U Ai) X (U Bi) | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| [itex] \Lambda^o \Sigma^o [/itex] mass difference | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 7 | ||
| why there is 2[itex]\pi[/itex] in every dirac delta function | Quantum Physics | 3 | ||