Register to reply 
A question in group theoryby Ledger
Tags: theory 
Share this thread: 
#1
Dec511, 02:31 PM

P: 11

This is not homework. Selfstudy. And I'm really enjoying it. But, as I'm going through this book ("A Book of Abstract Algebra" by Charles C. Pinter) every so often I run into a problem or concept I don't understand.
Let G be a finite abelian group, say G = (e,a1, a2, a3,...,an). Prove that (a1*a2*...an)^2 = e. So, it has a finite number of elements and it's a group. So it's associative, has an identity element and an inverse as elements of G, and as it's abelian so it's also commutative. But I don't see how squaring the product of its elements leads to the identity element e. Wait. Writing this has me thinking that each element might be being 'multiplied' by it's inverse yielding e for every pair, which when all mutiplied together still yields e, even when ultimately squared. Could that be the answer, even though I may not have stated it elegantly? There's no one I can ask so I brought it to this forum. 


#2
Dec511, 02:57 PM

P: 366




#3
Dec511, 03:45 PM

P: 11

'If the group has elements of order 2' I don't really understand that. The terminology in this book I understand (so far) is if the group is of order 2 that means it is a finite group with two elements.
Things are sometimes squared to get rid of a negative sign. But if the elements are numbers I would think that multiplying a negative number by its inverse (which would also be negative so the outcome is 1) would take care of that. But perhaps not so I'll go with squaring would knock a negative out of the final e. Is that it? 


#4
Dec511, 04:11 PM

Mentor
P: 18,230

A question in group theory
What spamiam means is that there might be an element [itex]a_i[/itex] such that [itex]a_i=a_i^{1}[/itex]. In that case, your proof would not hold anymore. Indeed, its inverse does not occur in the list since it equals [itex]a_i[/itex].



#5
Dec511, 04:33 PM

P: 11

So there could be an element of G that equals its own inverse. So squaring the product insures that this is reduced to e as well? Since they equal each other they should square to identity I think. Is this it?



#7
Dec511, 07:01 PM

P: 11

Thanks for your help!



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Group theory question  Calculus & Beyond Homework  9  
Group theory question  Calculus & Beyond Homework  12  
Group theory question  Calculus & Beyond Homework  50  
Another group theory question  Calculus & Beyond Homework  5  
Group theory question  General Physics  35 