Calculate Helmholtz Free Energy Change from Data

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Helmholtz free energy change for a 1 mol system transitioning from state A to state B, given specific thermodynamic parameters and conditions. The participants explore the implications of the process being isothermal or adiabatic, and how this affects the calculation of maximum work from a reversible work source.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the problem of determining the Helmholtz free energy change and expresses uncertainty about deriving the differential form from the provided coefficients.
  • Another participant suggests that if the process is reversible and in equilibrium, it must be isothermal, leading to the conclusion that dT=0.
  • There is mention of needing the heat capacity at constant volume (Cv) to compute the adiabatic constant, referencing Generalized Mayer's Rule.
  • A later reply questions whether the process is adiabatic or isothermal, noting that the temperature of the reservoir may be irrelevant in an adiabatic process.
  • One participant provides a mathematical approach for calculating work in an adiabatic transformation using the equation for a perfect gas, while expressing uncertainty about the relevance of Cp and the expansion coefficient in this context.
  • In the case of an isothermal transformation, there is uncertainty about how to compute the work without additional information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the transformation is adiabatic or isothermal, and there is no consensus on the implications of the heat capacity and expansion coefficient for the calculations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding and the need for further information to clarify the nature of the transformation and its implications for calculating work and Helmholtz free energy change.

Feynmanfan
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Let’s say we have a 1 mol system in a state A (Pa,Va,Ta are given) and we take it to a state B(Pb,Vb are given) . We want to know what’s the maximum work we can give to a reversible work source. Considering the process is carried out attached to a 150 K heat source, the only data available is this:

1. equation of adiabatic reversible curve
2. Cp (heat capacity at a given constant pressure (Pa )
3.  (expansion coefficient at a given constant pressure (Pa )

I’ve translated the problem into this: find A Helmholtz free energy change between points A and B. However I don’t know how to get dF=-SdT-PdV from the experimental coefficients mentioned above.

I’d appreciate your help very much.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Just a hint would be enough. I don't really know where to start from.
 
It's been a long time since i studied thermo but here i go. If we have only a heat source and the initial and final states are in equilibrium, they have to be at the same temperature of the source. If the process is reversible every single step is a equilibrium state and so it has to be at the same temperature too. So we can conclude that the process is isotherm and then dT=0.

If Cp is provided you'll need Cv to compute the adiabatic constant. There's a equation relating Cp-Cv and the diferent coefficients of expansion and such, Generalized Mayer's Rule i think.

I don't know if the process is adiabatic, if the temperature remains constant we'll need some mechanism to achieve this.

Hope this helps you a bit. Feel free to correct me if you find any mistake please.
 
Feynmanfan said:
Let’s say we have a 1 mol system in a state A (Pa,Va,Ta are given) and we take it to a state B(Pb,Vb are given) . We want to know what’s the maximum work we can give to a reversible work source. Considering the process is carried out attached to a 150 K heat source, the only data available is this:

1. equation of adiabatic reversible curve
2. Cp (heat capacity at a given constant pressure (Pa )
3.  (expansion coefficient at a given constant pressure (Pa )

I’ve translated the problem into this: find A Helmholtz free energy change between points A and B. However I don’t know how to get dF=-SdT-PdV from the experimental coefficients mentioned above.

I’d appreciate your help very much.

First of all, let me stress that I've not been solving this kind of problems for over twenty years, so I'm not very confident I'm right. I'll do my best and try and enjoy it. I hope it helps anyway.

Now, a couple of remarks:
1- is it an adiabatic or an isotherm transformation? If it is adiabatic, the reservoir temperature is irrelevant; if it is isotherm, I don't see how the adiabatic curve can help;
2- the change in Helmholtz free energy equals the work done only in the case of adiabatic quasi-static transformations - it does not help much in the isotherm case and might not be necessary to us in the adiabatic case (see below).

(1) In case the transformation is adiabatic, having the curve allows us to compute the work as

[tex]dL=PdV[/tex].

For example, in the case of a perfect classic gas the adiabatic change follows the path along the equation

[tex]PV^\gamma=cost=C=P_A V_A^\gamma[/tex]

that is

[tex]P=C/V^\gamma[/tex]

and we can compute the work as

[tex]dL=(C/V^\gamma)dV[/tex]

[tex]L=\int(C/V^\gamma)dV[/tex]

[tex]L=(C/\gamma)(V_B^{1-\gamma}-V_A^{1-\gamma})[/tex]

I don't see any use of [tex]c_P[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex]. On the other hand, having those two values at hand reminds me of a relationship that is valid for any adiabatic reversible transformation:

[tex]dT=\frac{TV\beta}{c_P}dP[/tex].

(2) In case the transformation is isotherm, I can't see how to compute the work without further information.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K