Is Psychology Just a Part of Philosophy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between psychology and philosophy, exploring whether psychology is a subset of philosophy or if philosophy is influenced by psychological factors. The scope includes theoretical perspectives, historical context, and the evolution of psychology as a discipline.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that psychology is fundamentally a part of philosophy, suggesting that one's psychological state is governed by their philosophical beliefs.
  • Others argue that philosophy is a byproduct of psychology, emphasizing that without psychological processes, individuals would not develop philosophical ideas.
  • One participant notes that much of psychology's history has been theoretical, aligning it more closely with philosophy than with scientific practice, particularly referencing psychoanalysis.
  • There is mention of a shift in psychology towards more scientific approaches in recent years, particularly in cognitive psychology and clinical psychology, indicating a move away from purely philosophical foundations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between psychology and philosophy, with no consensus reached on whether one is a subset of the other or how they influence each other.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the historical and theoretical foundations of psychology, as well as the evolving nature of the field in relation to scientific advancements.

ThomasJoe40
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Somehow I still believe psychology is just a part of philosophy, as one's psychology should be controlled by his or her philosophy... what do you think? :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or rather, one's philosophy is a byproduct of his psychology (psyche means soul in Greek).

I don't see how one's psychology is controlled by their philosophy. Because without their psyche, they wuold not have a philosophy to begin with.
 
Well, a lot of psychology in the past has been almost entirely theoretical, which made it more philosophical than scientific (this is particularly true with the history of psychoanalysis), but psychologists have been gradually cleaning up their act, in particular in the last twenty years with all of the advances in made in other neuroscientific fields of relevance to psychology. This is especially true in the realm of cognitive psychology and, slowly but surely, is becoming the case with clinical psychology.
 
loseyourname said:
Well, a lot of psychology in the past has been almost entirely theoretical, which made it more philosophical than scientific (this is particularly true with the history of psychoanalysis), but psychologists have been gradually cleaning up their act, in particular in the last twenty years with all of the advances in made in other neuroscientific fields of relevance to psychology. This is especially true in the realm of cognitive psychology and, slowly but surely, is becoming the case with clinical psychology.


I am sure that you are a psychologist.
 
ThomasJoe40 said:
I am sure that you are a psychologist.

Jesus no, but my ex-wife is a psychologist, and my current girlfriend's mother is a psychologist. I'm a student, and not a psychology student, either.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K