Complicated But Fun Try It See What U Get

  • Thread starter Thread starter aisha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a complex rational expression involving polynomials and identifying restrictions on the variable due to potential division by zero. The subject area includes algebraic manipulation and polynomial functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the simplification of a given expression and question whether their result of 1 is correct. There is also a focus on identifying restrictions related to the denominators of the expression, with some participants expressing confusion over which values to consider.

Discussion Status

Some participants agree on the simplification result, while others are actively questioning the validity of their identified restrictions. Guidance has been offered regarding how to find restrictions by setting denominators to zero, but confusion remains about specific values and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention multiple denominators and express uncertainty about which restrictions to derive from them. There is a specific mention of the need to avoid dividing by zero, which is central to the discussion.

aisha
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
Complicated But Fun! Try It See What U Get!

(x^(2)+6x+5)/(x^(2)+7x+12) MULTIPLIED BY (x^(2)+2x-8)/(x^(2)-25)
____________________________________________________________
ALL DIVIDED BY
(x^(2)-x-2)/(x^(2)-2x-15)

OK SIMPLIFY THIS

THE ANSWER I GOT WAS a simple 1
IS THIS CORRECT? :eek:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i get the same . . . 1
 
I FORGOT RESTRICTIONS! but I don't know what step to get the restrictions from, anyone have any ideas?

x cannot = -4,-3,-5,5,2,-1??
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH PLEASE HELP ME SOMEONE :eek:
 
Careful. Restrictions here are due to the undefined nature of a number divided by zero. For the denominator to never be equal to zero, neither of the polynomials in the denominator can ever equal zero. Therefore, to find restrictions, set each polynomial equal to zero and solve the equation to find the x-intercepts.
 
Thats exactly what I did but in this question there are soo many denominators I don't know which one to take the restriction from so the numbers in my last reply were all the restrictions from all the denominators... AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
SOMEONE please help me :rolleyes:
 
aisha said:
Thats exactly what I did but in this question there are soo many denominators I don't know which one to take the restriction from so the numbers in my last reply were all the restrictions from all the denominators... AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
SOMEONE please help me :rolleyes:

Why would u need any help??U did it splendidly.Like a mathematician would. :wink:
Everytime u're dealing with denominators (that means u have to divide something through another),make sure they're never zero.Sometimes that's simple to do,sometimes not.Practically u have to solve and to find all the roots of the equation "denominator=0".That's the rule.In your case,it was simple as u were able to decompose the polynomial in the denominator in simple monoms whose roots could have easily been found.

Daniel.
 
so those 6 restrictions I stated are correct? :smile:
 
Except for -1. -1 will set the numerator of the left fraction to zero, not the denominator.
 
BobG said:
Except for -1. -1 will set the numerator of the left fraction to zero, not the denominator.

Actually Bob,since the result is 1,ALL THE ROOTS OF THE DENOMINATOR'S POLYNOMIAL WILL ANULLATE THE NUMERATOR AS WELL.So you're saying there's no restriction on the entire fraction...?? :wink: :confused:
 
  • #10
Hey guys do I keep the -1 in my restriction or not :-p
 
  • #11
aisha said:
Hey guys do I keep the -1 in my restriction or not :-p

Yep,and the other numbers as well.For if u didn't,u'd be dividing something (incidentally it's 0) by 0.And that should no be okay.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K