Electricity and Magnetism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic potential and electric field at the center of a square arrangement of charged particles, specifically focusing on configurations with both positive and negative charges at the vertices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equations for electrostatic potential and electric field, questioning how to sum contributions from multiple charges. There are attempts to derive expressions based on specific charge arrangements and to understand the vector nature of electric fields.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the principles of adding scalar and vector quantities, while others are seeking clarification on how to visualize and calculate the resultant forces from multiple vectors. There is an ongoing exploration of the geometry involved in the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of their current learning stage, indicating that they are new to the concepts of electrostatics and vector addition. There is a focus on understanding the implications of charge arrangement on the calculations.

soccerjayl
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I have a huge problem to work out..

but first, i can't find the equations for

(1) electrostatic potential of the center of a square (a charged particle at each vertice)

and

(2) the magnitude of electric field at the center of the same square.

These are both questions to two arrangements, one with positive and negative particles at opposite ends, and arrangement 2 with both negative on right vertices and both positive on left vertices..

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figure it out for yourself. It's not so hard:
(1) The potential at a distance r from a point charge is [itex]kq/r[/itex]. It's a scalar, so just add up the contributions from each charge.
(2) The field at a distance r from a point charge is [itex]kq/r^2[/itex]. This is a vector directed radially outward (from a positive charge). Add up the contributions from each charge (but remember they are vectors).
 
so let me get this straight...sorry if this isn't a hard question to you, but we are just learning this..

for (1) in the situation where positives are at opposite vertices as well as negatives are at opposite vertices...the equation would be 4(9*10^9)(Q/(root2)s/2)? (with side s and charge +/-Q

for (2) in the same situation..it would be (9*10^9)(-Q/(root2)s/2) + (9*10^9)(-Q/(root2)s/2) - (9*10^9)(Q/(root2)s/2) - (9*10^9)(Q/(root2)s/2)?
 
Last edited:
soccerjayl said:
so let me get this straight...sorry if this isn't a hard question to you, but we are just learning this..

for (1) in the situation where positives are at opposite vertices as well as negatives are at opposite vertices...the equation would be 4(9*10^9)(Q/(root2)s/2)? (with side s and charge +/-Q

for (2) in the same situation..it would be (9*10^9)(-Q/(root2)s/2) - (9*10^9)(-Q/(root2)s/2) + (9*10^9)(Q/(root2)s/2) - (9*10^9)(Q/(root2)s/2)?

For (2) u can't add the contributions as if they were scalars.U have to add vectors.Make the correct picture in which draw every force.Project every force upon 2 perpendicular axes (parallel with the sides of the square) and add algebraically the projections which can be taken as scalars.
Geometry in electrostatics is essential.U should be getting factors with sine and cosine of pi/4.
 
i know this is aggravating for you, but how would u add up 4 vectors? Do you mean make 4 triangles with the square and make the forces on one axis and add/subtract?

(and are the -Q's going toward P with the +Q's going away from P?)
 
Last edited:
ok i think i know what you mean...but check me

the top right force for instance (-Q) would be made the top vertice of a triangle. You would do cospi/4 (45 deg) x the hypotenuse force to get the x-axis force??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K