What Does dp/dr Represent in Physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Brad_Ad23
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the derivative dp/dr in the context of momentum, mass, and velocity in physics. Participants explore its physical meaning, particularly in scenarios involving constant and variable mass, as well as in orbital motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that dp/dr could represent a change in momentum with respect to position, questioning whether it remains constant or zero in certain conditions.
  • Others clarify that dp/dt can be expressed in terms of mass and acceleration, leading to different interpretations of dp/dr depending on whether mass is constant or variable.
  • A participant introduces the concept of rocket motion, explaining how dp/dt has components related to mass and acceleration, as well as the rate of change of mass due to exhaust.
  • There is a discussion on the mathematical treatment of derivatives, with some participants emphasizing the importance of proper calculus usage when manipulating expressions involving derivatives.
  • One participant points out that in multi-dimensional motion, such as orbits, the relationship between distance and velocity is more complex than in one-dimensional cases.
  • Another participant acknowledges a previous error in notation regarding the relationship between velocity and position derivatives, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the mathematical framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physical representation of dp/dr, with no consensus reached on its meaning or implications in various contexts, particularly in orbital mechanics and variable mass scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about mass constancy, the treatment of derivatives, and the complexity of motion in multiple dimensions, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Brad_Ad23
Messages
497
Reaction score
1
Ok, we are given the known equation that momentum = mass times velocity.



p=mv.

What is dp/dr physically representing?

Given:

r = position.

dr/dt = v.

so

p = mdr/dt.

dp/dr = m/dt ? If so, that remains constant (or zero?) correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, momentum equals mass times velocity.
(That's basically the definition of momentum rather than a "known equation".)

p= mv.

IF m is a constant then dp/dt= m dv/dt= m a (mass times acceleration).

If m is not a constant (a very important consideration) then
dp/dt= m dv/dt+ dm/dt v.

dp/dt is, of course, "force"- that's basically, the definition of force.

dp/dr= (dp/dt)(dt/dr) (chain rule) or

dp/dr= (dp/dt)/(dr/dt)= (1/v)*force

Assuming constant mass, dp/dr= (m a)/v

I don't know that that "physically represents" anything in particular. I'm pretty sure it doesn't have a specific name.

As far as "dp/dr = m/dt" is concerned, that makes no sense at all- you have an "unattached" dt on the right.
 
That's what I am all confused about. Whether it represents anything at all, or if it will be a constant. A better way to visualize this is to imagine the mass is in an orbit.
 
dp/dt= m dv/dt+ dm/dt v.



This is the force law for a rocket. The force dp/dt has rwo components, current mass times acceleration (m dv/dt) and rate of change of mass times current speed (v dm/dt). This latter is due to the exhaust; dm/dt is the rate that reaction mass is being shot out the back. Note that the higher v is, the more that a given dm/dt contributes to the force on the rocket.
 
Yes, that much I knew. But this is the question:

p =mv.

dp/dt =mdv/dt (m is constant in this case)

dp = mdv

dp/dr = mdv/dr

Now, dv = dr/dt so we get 1/dt

dp/dr = m/dt.

I am just interested in this. The change in momentum with respect to distance, or mass with respect to time. In an orbit (notice this condition) would this quantity whatever it is, be constant, or zero?
 
You can't just divide out the dr's. derivatives like dr/dt aren't quotients exactly, they are the limits of quotients. It's allowable to multiply through, such as dr/dt = K, yields dr = Kdt ready for integration, but dividing out doesn't make sense.
 
Alright then.

dp = mdv

What does

dp/dr = mdv/dr represent?
 
First, about calculus:

You said dv=dr/dt. That is quite wrong. v=dr/dt (as you said in a previous post). Therefore, dv=d(dr/dt)=d^2r/dt. So you are misunderstanding the math.

Now about physics:

You are using v=dr/dt. This is only true for 1-dimensional motion, for example, a mass moving along a straight line. In that case, what Hallsofivy said is right. dp/dr=F/v; in words, dp/dr is the ratio of force applied, to the velocity attained. It's not zero and not constant. For example, if the force is pushing the mass in the direction opposite to its motion, the mass will slow down, stop, and reverse. At the point at which it has stopped, v=0 so dp/dr=F/v is infinite.

Now about orbits:

If you are thinking of something like a central force problem like planetary motion, and r is the distance between the masses, then the speed v is NOT dr/dt in general. The motion is 2-dimensional so you need another coordinate besides r to locate the mass. Usually use angle theta. Then the velocity has 2 components, dr/dt and
r*d(theta)/dt, and v is the square root of the sum of the squares of these 2 components.
 
Got it, thanks!



as for the dv = dr/dt thing, that was a mistype on my part. I was getting a bit type happy with d's and other things. Sorry for the math error!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K