| Thread Closed |
Obama's Candidacy |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar6-12, 03:58 PM | #392 |
|
|
Obama's Candidacy
OK I buy that mheslep
|
| Mar6-12, 04:10 PM | #393 |
|
|
EDIT: As to why I think Obama will be re-elected: 1. I haven't seen a really strong Republican contender actually run the front. Maybe if Jeb Bush joined, but it's a bit late for that. 2. He's an incumbent, and historically, incumbents have a good chance of re-election. |
| Mar6-12, 04:47 PM | #394 |
|
|
|
| Mar6-12, 04:50 PM | #395 |
|
|
|
| Mar6-12, 04:57 PM | #396 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
|
| Mar6-12, 05:07 PM | #397 |
|
|
The point that employment is now going up does not contradict the separate point that employment is at a historic low (last time was 1983), and that employment at these levels factors into elections.
|
| Mar6-12, 05:14 PM | #398 |
|
|
The Republicans have been steadfast in stalling public-works projects (you know, the bridges, highways, etc) that could employ workers on short notice that might possibly help Obama's chances. That will not go unnoticed when the primary process is done, and the general election enters its early stages. The Democrats are not stupid enough to ignore the advantages that could accrue from decrying and detailing the stalling and obstructionism used in Congress to game the system using arcane rules.
|
| Mar6-12, 05:16 PM | #399 |
|
|
Unemployment is still 'high' compared to long term averages, right? Just because it's going down doesn't mean he's safe from the historical perspective. I was addressing CharLimit's statement about incumbency being a good bet, but there's more to it than just being the man with the stuck currently.
|
| Mar6-12, 05:18 PM | #401 |
|
|
Do you honestly believe that 'keeping unemployement high' is why these projects are being turned down? That's quite an indictment. |
| Mar6-12, 05:25 PM | #402 |
|
|
Currently Obama is polling well against each of the Republican candidates and against generic Republican too. If the employment picture improves from here, it could be a problem for Republicans.
|
| Mar6-12, 06:18 PM | #403 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
Anyone see Obama's speech today? He interrupted my tv show.
|
| Mar6-12, 06:39 PM | #404 |
|
|
Gallup did a poll last week (with a fairly large sample size - don't recall the actual number), and estimated a seasonally adjusted Feb unemployment number of 8.6%, which is an increase from the 8.3% in Jan. And last I checked, Intrade was going at 8.4% or 8.5%. BLS numbers for Feb should be here soon - we'll see how it goes. The Jan dip was encouraging, but historically expected because of its Jan-ness.
The way I see it, if the unemp numbers are still in the 8's come November, Obama is toast. If it's at 7 or better, the Republicans are toast. If unemployment is in between, then it comes to gas prices. If gas is close to $5, Obama will need unemployment to be in the 6's or he'll have a hard time getting re-elected. Basically, the outcome of election will likely come down to a bunch of factors that are only weakly related to who the people in the race are. |
| Mar6-12, 09:16 PM | #405 |
|
|
|
| Mar6-12, 10:05 PM | #406 |
|
|
|
| Mar7-12, 05:17 AM | #407 |
|
|
|
| Mar7-12, 08:35 AM | #408 |
|
|
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Obama's Candidacy
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Ron Paul's candidacy | Current Events | 578 | ||
| Rick Santorum's candidacy ... | Current Events | 492 | ||
| Jon Huntsman's Candidacy | Current Events | 47 | ||
| Evo's candidacy... | Current Events | 23 | ||