Gas Giant Ring Collapse Theory for Rocky Planet Formation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that rocky planets could form from the collapse of gas giant ring systems, integrating with the gas giant's core. Participants concluded that such a theory lacks support due to the fundamental nature of gas giants, which possess rocky cores formed from the gas/dust halo around protostars. The limited mass of planetary rings, exemplified by Saturn's rings, further reinforces that their collapse would not provide sufficient material to transition a gas giant into a rocky planet.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gas giant formation and structure
  • Knowledge of planetary ring systems and their composition
  • Familiarity with the laws of physics governing planetary formation
  • Basic concepts of planetary geology and differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formation processes of gas giants, particularly the role of rocky cores
  • Explore the composition and dynamics of planetary ring systems, focusing on Saturn
  • Study the laws of physics related to planetary formation and stability
  • Investigate existing theories on rocky planet formation from various celestial materials
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, planetary scientists, and astrophysicists interested in planetary formation theories and the dynamics of gas giants and their rings.

Glenn
Has there ever been a hypothesis or theory propsed (current or obsolete) proposing that the rocky planets formed from gas giants whose ring system collapsed and combined with the core of the gas giant forming the bulk of a new rocky planet?

Just wondering if this has ever been proposed or whether it is even allowed by the laws of physics.

Thanks,
-Glenn
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Re-Planet Formation

I've not seen any theory like the one you are looking for, and to be honest, I would not expect to see one either.

I assume that such a theory would have to assume that a gas giant is all gas, after all if it is to "change into a rocky planet", then it would not have had a solid core to begin with. As I understand it, gas giants have rocky cores which form when they are born from the gas/dust halo around a protostar. They are only gas giants because they are large enough, and hence exert sufficient gravity to hold onto their volatiles, helium, and hydrogen. So, I don't see the clear distinction between "rocky" or "gas" planets which your theory would require.
Furthermore, I don't thing the amount of material in the rings around the planets of our solar system is very much. For example, if the rings of Saturn were somehow compacted you would only have the equivalent of a small moon or asteroid. If this was incorporated into the core of Saturn it would still be a gas giant. After all, the act of adding to the rocky core does not remove any of the gas that gives the planet its designation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K