Correcting for the Moon's gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew Mason
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of the Moon's gravity on weight measurements taken on Earth using a spring scale. Participants explore whether corrections for the Moon's gravitational influence are necessary and how these corrections might be applied based on the relative positions of the Earth and the Moon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the gravitational effects of the Moon on objects on Earth's surface, questioning the necessity and methodology of applying corrections. There are considerations of how the direction of the Moon's gravity changes as the Earth rotates and its implications for weight measurements.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different viewpoints regarding the calculations and assumptions made about the Moon's gravitational effects. Some participants express disagreement with specific computations while others emphasize the importance of considering the direction of gravitational forces in relation to weight measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the gravitational effects of the Moon vary based on distance and position, and there is a recognition that the Earth and Moon system's center of mass plays a role in these calculations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the forces acting on a body at Earth's surface, including centrifugal forces due to Earth's rotation.

Andrew Mason
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,827
Reaction score
527
Here is an interesting question.

When we make measurements of weight on Earth using a spring scale should we correct for the moon's gravity? The correction would be:

[tex]a_m = a_e\frac{M_m}{M_e}\frac{R_e^2}{d_m^2}[/tex]

where:
[itex]d_m[/itex] = 384,400 km (approximate distance of surface of Earth to centre of moon)
[itex]R_e[/itex] = 6400 km (radius of earth)
[itex]M_m[/itex] = 5.98E24 kg (mass of moon)
[itex]M_m[/itex] = 7.35E22 kg. (mass of earth)
[itex]a_m[/itex] = acceleration due to moon gravity on surface of earth
[itex]a_e[/itex] = acceleration due to Earth gravity on surface of earth

The correction (about g/293000 = 3.4 E-6g) would be subtracted when your location on the Earth is facing away from the moon and added when your location is facing toward the moon. Or would it?

AM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well,Andrew it's basically the same problem with the one that explains tides.Lunar (and much less Solar,Jupiter,Mars and Venus) attraction dimineshes the gravitational force acting on a body on the surface of the earth,if the 2 forces have opposite sense (the same direction) which is realized when the body is facing the moon,and increases the gravitational force when the two forces have both the same direction and sense,which it's realized when the body is on the opposite side of the Earth wrt to the Moon.

Daniel.

PS.I'm afraid i would not agree with your computations though;lunar's gravity effects vary,since at one point the distance is 384400Km-6400Km (diminishing the effect of the Earth's attraction),and at the exactly opposite point is 384400Km+6400Km.I'm sure u know that the "d_{m}",which you've chosen as 384400Km,is measured actually between the centers of the 2 celestial bodies...
 
Andrew,

dextercioby is correct. Essentially, we are in freefall with respect to the Moon much like astronauts are in freefall with respect to the Earth and "feel" no gravitational force (i.e., they experience weightlessness). However, if the spacecraft were large then the freefall would be with respect to its center of mass and objects in the craft closer or further away from the Earth than the craft's center of mass would feel a force proportional to their distance from the center of mass. That would be approximately proportional to the inverse cube of the distance of the craft from the center of the Earth. The same argument will apply to weight corrections on Earth due to the Moon's gravitational pull.
 
Tide said:
Andrew,

dextercioby is correct. Essentially, we are in freefall with respect to the Moon much like astronauts are in freefall with respect to the Earth and "feel" no gravitational force (i.e., they experience weightlessness). However, if the spacecraft were large then the freefall would be with respect to its center of mass and objects in the craft closer or further away from the Earth than the craft's center of mass would feel a force proportional to their distance from the center of mass. That would be approximately proportional to the inverse cube of the distance of the craft from the center of the Earth. The same argument will apply to weight corrections on Earth due to the Moon's gravitational pull.
This is all true. But I am not talking about the difference in the magnitude of the gravity of the moon over the extra 12,800 km (earth diameter). I am talking about the direction of it relative to the up/down direction of a person on the Earth surface. I don't think this is related to the tidal forces, which, as you quite correctly state, are due to the difference in magnitude of the gravitational force over that 12,800 km.

AM
 
dextercioby said:
Well,Andrew it's basically the same problem with the one that explains tides.Lunar (and much less Solar,Jupiter,Mars and Venus) attraction dimineshes the gravitational force acting on a body on the surface of the earth,if the 2 forces have opposite sense (the same direction) which is realized when the body is facing the moon,and increases the gravitational force when the two forces have both the same direction and sense,which it's realized when the body is on the opposite side of the Earth wrt to the Moon.
I don't think this is a tidal issue. It has to do with the different direction of the moon's gravity relative to up/down at a particular location as the Earth rotates. As you say, the magnitude of the moon's gravity would change as the Earth turned, but I am really just concerned with its direction.

PS.I'm afraid i would not agree with your computations though;lunar's gravity effects vary,since at one point the distance is 384400Km-6400Km (diminishing the effect of the Earth's attraction),and at the exactly opposite point is 384400Km+6400Km.I'm sure u know that the "d_{m}",which you've chosen as 384400Km,is measured actually between the centers of the 2 celestial bodies...
Quite right. As the Earth turns, there is a total difference of about 6%. But I am talking about the 200% difference due to the different direction.

The key here, I think, is to recognize that the Earth is actually in orbit around the centre of mass of the Earth and moon system.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
I don't think this is a tidal issue. It has to do with the different direction of the moon's gravity relative to up/down at a particular location as the Earth rotates. As you say, the magnitude of the moon's gravity would change as the Earth turned, but I am really just concerned with its direction.

The question is simple.At each moment of time a body at the Earth's's surface is acted upon by three forces:the gravity force of the earth,the gravity force of the moon and the centrifugal force due to the rotation of the earth.(4,if u include the normal reaction force of the Earth as a response to the body's pressure on the Earth).Taking into account different positions on the globe (meaning different latitudes and longitudes),composing these three vectors will have different results.The most dramatic change is observed when all these 3 forces have the same direction (support).
I'm sure that u can draw some vector diagrams,use the correct figures and compute the total (resulting) acceleration.If u include the normal reaction force,the net acceleration should be zero...

Andrew Mason said:
]Quite right. As the Earth turns, there is a total difference of about 6%. But I am talking about the 200% difference due to the different direction.
The key here, I think, is to recognize that the Earth is actually in orbit around the centre of mass of the Earth and moon system.
AM

In that case,u need to make some corrections to the calculations made assuming the Earth was fixed and rotating around its axis and the moon circling the Earth.I don't think the order of magnitude of these corrections will be significant wrt to the idealized case pictured above.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K