Register to reply

Chiral currents of a Dirac plane wave

by Slereah
Tags: chiral, currents, dirac, plane, wave
Share this thread:
Mar1-12, 02:04 PM
P: 7
I am currently trying to check the formula for the chiral current of the Dirac equation for a plane wave solution (found here ), that is,

[itex]j_{R}^\mu = \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R[/itex]

[itex]j_{L}^\mu = \psi_L^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_L[/itex]


[itex] \psi_R = I( \cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \sigma^i n_i \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2})) \xi e^{ix^\mu p_\mu} [/itex]

[itex]\psi_R = I( \cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) - \sigma^i n_i \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2})) \xi e^{ix^\mu p_\mu}[/itex]

χ being the rest frame spinor, θ the rapidity and n the direction of the momentum.

So for the right-handed current, I get

[itex]\psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = ([\cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n} \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) ] \xi)^\dagger \sigma^\mu [\cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n} \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) ] \xi [/itex]

[itex]\psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = \cosh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) \xi^\dagger \sigma^\mu \xi + \cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) \xi^\dagger( \sigma^\mu (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) + (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \sigma^\mu ) \xi + \sinh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) \xi^\dagger (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \sigma^\mu (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \xi [/itex]

Using the following hyperbolic identities,

[itex]\sinh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} [\cosh(\theta) - 1] = \frac{1}{2} [\gamma - 1] [/itex]

[itex]\cosh^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} [\cosh(\theta) + 1] = \frac{1}{2} [\gamma + 1] [/itex]

[itex]\cosh(\frac{\theta}{2}) \sinh(\frac{\theta}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} \sinh(\theta) = \frac{1}{2} \beta \gamma[/itex]

And defining the spin vector

[itex]\xi^\dagger \sigma^\mu \xi = s^\mu = (1,\vec{s}) [/itex]

I get the following :

[itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = \frac{1}{2} [ \gamma \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu + \sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i ) \xi + \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu -\sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i ) \xi + \beta_i \gamma \xi^\dagger \{\sigma^\mu, \sigma^i\} \xi ] [/itex]

[itex]\beta_i [/itex] being [itex]\beta n_i [/itex], and [itex]\sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i [/itex] coming from [itex](\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n}) \sigma^\mu (\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n})[/itex] (I can't find the exact proof to show it to be so, but I think this is correct - though it may be the problem). So far this is pretty much the results indicated. But then, if I try finding out the results using this identity :

[itex]\sigma^i \sigma^\mu \sigma_i = \bar{\sigma}^\mu[/itex]

I finally get this formula :

[itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu \psi_R = \frac{1}{2} [ \gamma \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu + \bar{\sigma}^\mu) \xi + \xi^\dagger (\sigma^\mu -\bar{\sigma}^\mu ) \xi + \beta_i \gamma \xi^\dagger \{\sigma^\mu, \sigma^i\} \xi ] [/itex]

Which gives the following components for the current :

[itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^0 \psi_R = \gamma \xi^\dagger \xi + \beta_i \gamma \xi^\dagger \sigma^i \xi = \gamma + \gamma \beta_i s^i[/itex]

Which is the correct result, but for the spatial components I find

[itex] \psi_R^\dagger \sigma^j \psi_R = \xi^\dagger \sigma^j \xi + \beta^j \gamma \xi^\dagger \xi = s^j + \beta^j \gamma[/itex]

Which according to the book lacks a term in [itex]+ (\gamma-1) \beta^i s_i \beta^j [/itex], unless I am misinterpreting the notation used (the results are page 16).
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
NASA team lays plans to observe new worlds
IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory
Spinach could lead to alternative energy more powerful than Popeye

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Why is it only chiral molecules that rotate plane polarized light? Chemistry 2
Hermitian conjugate of plane wave spinors for Dirac equation Advanced Physics Homework 0
Probability Current: from plane wave to wave packet? Quantum Physics 14
QFT Dirac Chiral Equations of Motion Advanced Physics Homework 2
Nullity of wave 4 - vector for grav. plane wave Special & General Relativity 1