What Is the Relationship Between Constant Velocity, Force, and Work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between constant velocity, force, and work, particularly in the context of kinetic energy and the implications of motion without acceleration. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these concepts in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of constant velocity on force and work, questioning how kinetic energy relates to distance traveled. They examine the scenario of zero acceleration and its effect on force and work done.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between kinetic energy and work, while others are questioning the definitions of work and energy in the context of physical activity, such as walking and the energy expenditure involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the distinction between energy used and work done, with references to the role of friction and muscle exertion in physical movement. Participants are considering how these factors influence the understanding of work in physics.

Ret_24
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The SI units for force is kg*m/s^2. So, if a object travels a certain distance with no acceleration, because it has a constant velocity. What is the force? Is it correct to find the KE, which units are kg*m^2/s^2 and divide the distance?

Also, KE is the energy from motion, correct? So, is that energy the same for any distance, if the velocity is constant? KE=.5*m*v^2. If so, how can that be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ret_24 said:
The SI units for force is kg*m/s^2. So, if a object travels a certain distance with no acceleration, because it has a constant velocity. What is the force? Is it correct to find the KE, which units are kg*m^2/s^2 and divide the distance?

If acceleration is 0 m/s^2, then the force on the object is 0N (since F=ma).

Ret_24 said:
Also, KE is the energy from motion, correct? So, is that energy the same for any distance, if the velocity is constant? KE=.5*m*v^2. If so, how can that be?

Since we have 0 m/s^2 acceleration we know that velocity is constant, and K.E is constant.

Let's see if our work energy equation gives the same result:

Work = Force * Distance = (K.Efinal - K.Einitial).

Force is 0N. So work is 0J. so:
K.Efinal-K.Einitial=0J
so K.Efinal=K.Einitial

So it all works out.
 
Great, thanks. That helps.

But answer this, if person walks 1 mile it will require a certain amount of kilojoules to "drive" this person to walk this far. So, they in take food to produce these kilojoules. So, how can there be no work? I understand the idea of change of energy or change in acceleration. But work is defined as change in energy and not energy used or created? :rolleyes:

Also would there be work if the person walk uphill at a certain angle for a certain distance? Potential?
 
Ret_24 said:
Great, thanks. That helps.

But answer this, if person walks 1 mile it will require a certain amount of kilojoules to "drive" this person to walk this far. So, they in take food to produce these kilojoules. So, how can there be no work? I understand the idea of change of energy or change in acceleration. But work is defined as change in energy and not energy used or created? :rolleyes:

Also would there be work if the person walk uphill at a certain angle for a certain distance? Potential?

Note that it's the frictional force that drives a person forward. He exerts a backward force on the ground with his feet, and the friction is the reactional force that pushes him forward.

We use up energy exerting forces with our muscles, even when those forces don't do any work! :smile: For example a weightlifter can lift up a weight and then hold it motionless. When he's lifting it up, chemical energy is being converted to mechanical energy in his arms, which is then transferred to the weight as kinetic energy and finally gravitational potential energy.

But while he's holding the weight up in the air, he's not doing any work on it (since it isn't moving). But he's still losing chemical energy, because the muscles need to remain in tension, and keep exerting the upward force on the weight. That energy that he's losing is converted to heat.

I believe that generally, as long as our muscles are exerting a force, we will be losing energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K