New Reply

Special Relativity Clocks

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun17-12, 11:25 AM   #154
JM
 

Special Relativity Clocks


Quote by ghwellsjr View Post
I have no idea what you are talking about here but I don't think it can be related to what Einstein said with regard to inertial coordinate systems in Special Relativity, which is what this thread is about.
Right on George!
Jun17-12, 12:31 PM   #155
 
Mentor
Quote by ghwellsjr View Post
What would you call the clocks in the latticework described by Kip Thorne on page 3 of his upcoming book on relativity?
I would call them "clocks".
Jun17-12, 12:32 PM   #156
 
Mentor
Quote by JM View Post
My answer is t' = [1/m + v2/c2 - uv/c[SUP]2[SUP]t.
Whats yours?
What is the question and what are m, u, and v?
Jun17-12, 04:11 PM   #157
 
Quote by JM View Post
Thanks, harrylin. I follow your ideas. My need is for the math that connects the time t'' of moving rotated frame with the time t of the original stationary frame K. Assume the points A, (0,0,0 ) and B, ( 1,1,0) wrt K. I accept that the relation between the frames with their respective 'x' axes aligned with these points is the same as the relation between the original K and K' axes. But a clock moving at v along the line between A and B moves at only vcos45 wrt K, for example. So what is the math that connects t'' with t?
JM
It looks as if my next remark didn't reach:
"
- the straight same constant speed trajectory BC is another line of the polygon. The Lorentz transformation relating "time" in a co-moving frame along AB is identical to that along BC: x is by definition the direction of motion. And obviously from point B the clock has to continue its counting from where it was the moment before - that's just common sense.
"
I'll try again. For the first leg, the X-axis of K and K' is by definition chosen along the line AB. It is you who draws the lines and defines the frames for the calculation. Thus you give A and B the same Y and Z coordinate (in this case you can keep them both 0), and v along x is simply v. That's how the Lorentz transformations are defined. And how the math between the polygon lines is connected I explained next. So, I'm afraid that you could not follow me.
To elaborate: you choose for the calculation for BC new reference frames with X and X' oriented along BC.
Jun18-12, 03:07 AM   #158
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by DaleSpam View Post
Quote by ghwellsjr View Post
What would you call the clocks in the latticework described by Kip Thorne on page 3 of his upcoming book on relativity?
I would call them "clocks".
Then what would you do to JesseM's quote to make it satisfactory to you?
Jun23-12, 06:20 PM   #159
JM
 
Quote by DaleSpam View Post
What is the question and what are m, u, and v?
m is the coefficient in the LT often refered to as gamma. v is the speed of the frame moving in the x direction of the stationary frame K. u is the speed of a single clock moving in the + x direction of K. The question is 'what is the time on the single moving clock'?
Jun23-12, 06:34 PM   #160
JM
 
Quote by harrylin View Post
It looks as if my next remark didn't reach:
I think you didn't understand my question.
Section 4 of 1905 envisions a single clock moving along a polygon path wrt a stationary frame K. The clock starts at a point of K and returns to the same point of K. What you have described is the time of the clock wrt the polygon path. What you have not described is the time of the clock wrt the original frame K. This is the time that is required in order to make a valid comparison with the K time at the end of the path.
Jun23-12, 07:53 PM   #161
 
Quote by JM View Post
I think you didn't understand my question.
Section 4 of 1905 envisions a single clock moving along a polygon path wrt a stationary frame K. The clock starts at a point of K and returns to the same point of K. What you have described is the time of the clock wrt the polygon path. What you have not described is the time of the clock wrt the original frame K. This is the time that is required in order to make a valid comparison with the K time at the end of the path.
If the time on the clock at rest wrt the polygon is [itex]T[/itex] and the speed of the second observer is [itex]v[/itex], then the clock for the observer moving wrt the polygon will show [itex]t=T \sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}[/itex] when the observers are reunited so they can compare clocks.
Does this answer your question?
Jun23-12, 09:43 PM   #162
 
Mentor
Quote by JM View Post
m is the coefficient in the LT often refered to as gamma. v is the speed of the frame moving in the x direction of the stationary frame K. u is the speed of a single clock moving in the + x direction of K. The question is 'what is the time on the single moving clock'?
For approximately the 100th time I refer you to the formula I posted back in post 36. The time displayed on the clock is:

[tex]\tau = \int \sqrt{1-v(t)^2/c^2} dt[/tex]
So in frame K
[tex]\tau = t \sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}+C_1[/tex]
And in the other frame
[tex]\tau = t \sqrt{1-\frac{(u+v)^2}{c^2(1+uv/c^2)^2}}+C_2[/tex]
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Special Relativity Clocks
Thread Forum Replies
Special Relativity Clocks Special & General Relativity 90
special relativity clocks observed from two frames Introductory Physics Homework 3
theory of special relativity -clocks and objects Introductory Physics Homework 1
Clocks out of Sync (Special Relativity) Introductory Physics Homework 7
synchronized clocks in special relativity Special & General Relativity 17