Thread Closed

Call to extend [mainstream] alien life search: BBC

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep17-03, 12:03 AM   #1
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Call to extend [mainstream] alien life search: BBC


Jupiter or Mars-like planets beyond our Solar System may be serious contenders for harbouring life, says a British astrophysicist.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3109910.stm
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
astronomy news on PhysOrg.com

>> Researchers explain magnetic field misbehavior in solar flares
>> Fragile mega-galaxy is missing link in history of cosmos
>> Researchers reveal model of Sun's magnetic field
Sep17-03, 03:54 PM   #2
 
I've scepticism of any life being found on a "Jupiter-type" world, but I agree wholeheartedly with searching their moons. The writer of the article hasn't done a terribly lot of reasearch though, or they'd realise Mars-like planets aren't able to be detected yet.

And come to think of it, why did they say Mars-like planets and not come out and say "Earth-like" planets. Would have made more sense, to me.
Sep17-03, 04:10 PM   #3
 
Great link, Ivan Seeking. Thanks.

I really appreciate that mainstream science is finally recognizing the utter anthropocentricism of believing that life couldn't exist on planets that are uninhabitable by typical "Earth life". It's obvious that, if life evolved on other planets, it would have adapted to its planet's conditions not Earth's.
Sep18-03, 07:54 PM   #4
 

Call to extend [mainstream] alien life search: BBC


It's obvious that, if life evolved on other planets, it would have adapted to its planet's conditions not Earth's.
Unless you're thinking that life can't evolve in any place other than an Earth-like enviroment.

(The phrase "Earth-like" is used liberally, meaning any planet within appropriate temp zones and having a solid surface, etc.)
Sep24-03, 03:51 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
come to think of it, why did they say Mars-like planets and not come out and say "Earth-like" planets
Er, they did make a clear distinction, and explain why; e.g. (quote from the article): "... boosts the chances of finding life on non Earth-like planets circling stars other than our Sun"

... mainstream science is finally recognizing the utter anthropocentricism of believing that life couldn't exist on planets that are uninhabitable by typical "Earth life"
Um, there is an interesting difficulty being assumed away here. Leave aside whether mainstream science can 'believe' anything; let's say you wished to study, using the scientific method, 'life in non-Earth environments'. How would you go about it?
a) Find some life in non-Earth environments and study it?
b) go to non-Earth environments and look for life?
c) take Earth life to a non-Earth environment and see what happens?

Turn the question around; how would you go about testing - using the scientific method - the following ideas (suitably reworded so they were hypotheses)?
1) non-Earth life thrives in the cores of neutron stars
2) non-Earth life has a characteristic time of 40 million years
3) dark matter creatures inhabit ecosystems which we call rich galaxy clusters.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Call to extend [mainstream] alien life search: BBC
Thread Forum Replies
How to extend? Linear & Abstract Algebra 4
alien life ? Biology 9
Speculation On Alien Life Biology 4
Experts Call on Senate for Support for Near-Earth Object Search General Astronomy 3
Lonely Planets: The Natural Philosophy of Alien Life Biology 0