Optimizing Distance for Swimming and Running Combination

  • Thread starter Thread starter recon
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves optimizing the distance Joe should swim to minimize his total time returning to his parents along a riverbank. The scenario includes swimming and running speeds, with Joe starting 50 meters from the bank and needing to cover a total distance of 100 meters along the bank.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the time function based on swimming and running distances. There are attempts to derive the optimal landing point using calculus and graphing methods. Some participants question the correctness of the initial time formula and explore alternative approaches.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different methods for solving the problem, including calculus and graphical approaches. There is recognition of the complexity of the equations involved, and some participants express uncertainty about the appropriateness of using calculus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention constraints related to homework rules and express uncertainty about the use of calculus in their solutions. There is also a focus on simplifying complex equations and finding elegant solutions.

recon
Messages
399
Reaction score
1
Joe is swimming in a river 50 metres away from the bank. He would like to get back to his parents who are 100m along the river bank from where he is. If he can swim at 3 m/sec and run at 7m/sec, how far along the bank should he land in order to get back as quickly as possible?

So far, I've figured out how to do this:

Let [tex]x[/tex] be the distance along the bank that he should land in order to get back as quickly as possible.

Since he's 50 m away from the bank, he has to swim a distance of [tex]\sqrt{x^2 + 50^2}[/tex] metres, and then run a distance of [tex]100-x[/tex] metres.

The total amount of time taken to do this is [tex]\frac{7}{100-x} + \frac{3}{\sqrt{x^2 + 50^2}}[/tex].

Now, I can tabulate everything on an Excel spreadsheet, and figure out the answer from there, which is: he should land roughly 23.7 metres along the bank from where he is. Is there a more elegant way of getting around this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry,but the formula is wrong...U divided speed by distance to find time...It is wrong.It's the other way around.
The total time is
[tex]t(x)=\frac{100-x}{7}+\frac{\sqrt{2500+x^{2}}}{3}[/tex]

Do you know calculus??

Daniel.
 
recon said:
Joe is swimming in a river 50 metres away from the bank. He would like to get back to his parents who are 100m along the river bank from where he is. If he can swim at 3 m/sec and run at 7m/sec, how far along the bank should he land in order to get back as quickly as possible?

So far, I've figured out how to do this:

Let [tex]x[/tex] be the distance along the bank that he should land in order to get back as quickly as possible.

Since he's 50 m away from the bank, he has to swim a distance of [tex]\sqrt{x^2 + 50^2}[/tex] metres, and then run a distance of [tex]100-x[/tex] metres.

The total amount of time taken to do this is [tex]\frac{7}{100-x} + \frac{3}{\sqrt{x^2 + 50^2}}[/tex].

Now, I can tabulate everything on an Excel spreadsheet, and figure out the answer from there, which is: he should land roughly 23.7 metres along the bank from where he is. Is there a more elegant way of getting around this?

Your answer is correct. But in your formulas above you've put in speed/distance instead of distance/speed for time.

Do you know calculus? If you do, then the way I did it was to calculate the derivative of the time function, and solve for 0.
 
Thanks a lot, you two. I just thought that there might be a more elegant way of solving this problem ,rather than using brute force through calculus or tabulating. I'm not sure if I'm allowed to solve this problem through calculus.
 
Edit: Recon, basically graph it and find its vertex, lowest point. Good enough answer...
 
Last edited:
Yapper said:
Recon, basically graph it and find its vertex. Same point that using calculus gives you

Calculus yields the exact answer to
[tex]x_{extrema}=\pm \frac{75}{\sqrt{10}}[/tex]

U can check that the physically acceptable solution (with the plus) corresponds to a maximum,plugging the value in the second derivative.The answer should be <0.

Daniel.
 
Isnt the second derivative a constant?
 
Nope,the second derivative is a pretty ugly (sic) function.

Differentiate 2 times the original functions and convince yourself.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby, to answer a question you asked earlier, I know only a little bit of calculus.

I tried calculus and came out with this nasty looking equation:

[tex]\frac{\frac{21}{49}^2 \times 2500}{1 - \frac{21}{49}^2} = x^2[/tex]

Solving for x yields the correct answer. However, I would like to know how you managed to simplify x to [tex]\frac{75}{\sqrt{10}}[/tex]
 
  • #10
The derivative of the function is
[tex]t'(x)=-\frac{1}{7}+\frac{x}{3\sqrt{2500+x^{2}}}[/tex]

Equate it to zero and square the resulting equation.

Daniel.
 
  • #11
Oh ok i see. I get [3sqrt(2500+x^2)-((x^2)/3sqrt(2500+x^2))]/[9(2500+x^2)] Is that right for the second derivative?
 
  • #12
It looks okay...It might have helped by tired eyes if u had used LaTex.

Daniel.
 
  • #13
1/49=(x^2)/(22500+9x^2)

9(2500+x^2)/49 = x^2 do I just use the quadratic equation? That gets messy... how did you get the nice numbers?

How do i use latex?
 
  • #14
Yapper said:
1/49=(x^2)/(22500+9x^2)

9(2500+x^2)/49 = x^2 do I just use the quadratic equation? That gets messy... how did you get the nice numbers?

How do i use latex?

You're on the right track.
[tex]22500+9x^{2}=49x^{2}[/tex]
Solve for "x" and chose the "+" solution

Daniel.
 
  • #15
Oh duh... lol 40x^2 - 22500 ahaha

+/- sqrt(-4*40*(-22500)) / 80 woohoo... let's see...

2*2*150*sqrt(10) / 80

7.5sqrt(10) * sqrt(10)/sqrt(10) = 75/sqrt(10) yay! Is this how you did it? or is there an easier methoid, you got it fast.
 
  • #16
You chased your tail a little bit,but it's okay... :-p As to answer your question,i don't know,maybe I'm fast...? :confused:

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K