The Golden Age of Science: When will it end?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the "Golden Age of Science" and speculations regarding its potential end. Participants explore the implications of rapid technological advancements, particularly in fields such as nanotechnology, genetic engineering, and quantum computing, while questioning the future necessity of research and scientists.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate about an approaching "singularity" in technological progress, driven by advancements in various scientific fields.
  • One participant argues that knowledge in many areas is not increasing but rather becoming more efficient.
  • Another points out that the explosion of new understanding in mathematics continues, suggesting that not all fields are stagnating.
  • Concerns are raised about the future role of scientists and engineers, with some suggesting that advancements in AI and quantum computing could render them unnecessary.
  • There is a humorous exchange about the implications of automation in food service, reflecting on past experiences with fast food.
  • One participant emphasizes the complexity of understanding the human brain, arguing that it remains a significant challenge despite advances in technology.
  • Historical references are made to past predictions about the end of science, with one participant asserting that science has continually evolved to address deeper questions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views, with some believing that the end of significant scientific discovery is near, while others argue that science will continue to evolve and present new challenges. There is no consensus on whether we are approaching the end of the Golden Age of Science.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' claims depend on assumptions about the future trajectory of technological advancements and the nature of scientific inquiry, which remain unresolved.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
As most of us know, we are currently in the midst of a fantastic explosion of information unlike any seen in human history. There has been speculation about an approaching "singularity" of information flow - really a nearly vertical spike in the rate of technological progress made as a function of time. So most discussions among futurists center on this approaching spike which is powered by modern electronics, and ultimately resulting from a confluence of nanotechnology, genetic engineering and manipulation, quantum processing, not to mention some of today's cutting edge physics, and maybe even a GUT.

What I haven't read much about is when this might end. Kaku mentioned that we might find a GUT but it may take centuries to fully understand the implications. So the end is not really THE END, but it does seem that we are reaching limits in many respects. The smallest transistor has been built - having a base only three atoms thick [okay, maybe they'll figure out how to make it in two], so the transistor age is effectively over. We can manipulate atoms, one at a time, quantum computers will utilize the deepest aspects of reality to grab magical answers from Hilbert Space, the genome is a done deal, and gene splicing is now old stuff.

So, how long until, in principle at least, we no longer need research projects or scientists? Oh yes, with quantum computers and AI, we can probably ditch the engineers as well. In fact, I wonder about what people will do? So much of modern life is basically doomed - the days are numbered. Even service jobs like McDonalds are soon to be gone. [I helped to develop one of the systems for the first automated Taco Bell]. It seems that post singularity economics will be something altogether new as well.

Any futurists among us?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I think it's already over, our knowledge in most areas isn't really increasing any more, just becoming vastly more efficient.
 
The explosion of new understanding in mathematics seems to be continuing; the late twentieth century was already termed a Golden Age of Math because of that.

Biological knowledge, especially at the molecular level, seems to be doubling every few years; I suppose they will eventually reach a point where they understand every single biological interaction in paralyzing detail, but I don't think that will be any time soon.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
[I helped to develop one of the systems for the first automated Taco Bell].
Ahah! So, when we're all being fed by machines we'll know who to blame! Actually, it might not be that bad, we won't have to worry anymore about someone spitting into our food. Did you remember to program the machines to pick the mice and roaches out of the food?

Growing up I had friends that worked for Taco Bell and other fast food places talking about dishing mice out of the deep fryer that accidently fell in apparently while crawling along the overhead ledge and roaches in the meat. But it's all protein, right?

Give me a soft mouse taco...hold the roaches.
 
Did we ever "need" research projects or scientists ?
 
The end is only in sight when you run out of imagination. Once all those annoying fundamental properties of nature are discovered, we can divert our attention to more interesting aspects of reality, like why you can't nail jello to a tree.
 
I told you how to nail jello to a tree, doggonnit, you freeze it! See, the end IS near!
 
Evo said:
Growing up I had friends that worked for Taco Bell and other fast food places talking about dishing mice out of the deep fryer that accidently fell in apparently while crawling along the overhead ledge and roaches in the meat. But it's all protein, right?

Give me a soft mouse taco...hold the roaches.

Compared to the stuff that's supposed to go through those machines, that's really not so bad. Of course, we got to work with four day old refried beans that had been sitting in the shop. [edit: If anyone would like to know about the intricacies of pumping and accurately squirting measured volumes of four day old refried beans, send me a PM.]

Do you remember back in the early 70's when TB got busted for selling horse meat? Anyway, OT.
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking said:
Compared to the stuff that's supposed to go through those machines, that's really not so bad. Of course, we got to work with four day old refried beans that had been sitting in the shop. [edit: If anyone would like to know about the intricacies of pumping and accurately squirting measured volumes of four day old refried beans, send me a PM.]

Do you remember back in the early 70's when TB got busted for selling horse meat? Anyway, OT.
Horse meat is popular in Europe. Especially Belgium and France, but also Sweden, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria and The Netherlands. Perhaps TB should consider franchises there? :biggrin:
 
  • #10
Ivan Seeking said:
So, how long until, in principle at least, we no longer need research projects or scientists? Oh yes, with quantum computers and AI, we can probably ditch the engineers as well.

Don't be so quick to ditch the engineers! If quantum computing pans out, we may well have virtually unlimited computational power at our fingertips. But computational power is only good for crunching the best algorithms you have. So far, no AI project has come close to approaching human intelligence. One significant reason seems to be that the brain is a pretty holistic operating mechanism; you can't easily abstract one piece of functionality if you want to get something as flexible as human intellect.

When you think about it, discovering and understanding the relatively simple laws of physics is a somewhat modest task compared to trying to figure out the inner workings of the human brain, easily the most complex physical system we've yet encountered. We already do understand a lot of how the brain works, but being able to amass all the relevant pieces of the puzzle and then re-assemble them into a complete picture of how the human mind works is still a daunting task. Future advances in technology, particularly nanotechnology I think, might help us to eventually entirely reverse engineer the brain; but hammering out an abstract understanding of everything it does, and why it does it, would certainly still remain a significant and daunting further problem. Completely understanding the brain is probably the most difficult scientific task ahead of us, and I would bet it's going to take a long time to figure out, singularity or not.

But don't quote me on that. :rolleyes:
 
  • #11
Every so many years people start getting the feeling that the end of science is near.

Near the end of the 1890s, the commissioner of the US Patent Office is said to have proclaimed that "Everything that can be invented has been invented"

http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/Chem-History/Chadwick-1932/Chadwick-neutron.html in 1932, heralded another short-lived period of similar thought among many, now that Relativity and Quantum mechanics had been established and all the constituents of the atom had been accounted for.

Each time science has been able to come up with deeper questions and newer problems, the trail of which have led to wondrous and beautiful discoveries.

Sorry folks, but if you're waiting for the end, prepare to hang around for the long haul.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Yay for lovely, dark, deep woods. PLenty of work for me to set to.
 
  • #13
Ivan Seeking said:
I told you how to nail jello to a tree, doggonnit, you freeze it! See, the end IS near!
You speak as if you assume I never thought of that. The only way frozen jello works is if you freeze it with a hole through which to drive the nail. I protest that as a rule violation. You then have jello suspended by a nail driven into a tree, not jello nailed to a tree. Unless you have perfect geometry and timing, you cannot nail frozen jello to a tree without fracturing it... er, I never actually tried this myself. It just so happens I was sitting in the park one day when this guy wearing a carpenter's belt and carrying a cooler walked up to this tree I was under and... did I mention the part where the apple fell on my head?
 
  • #14
Smurf said:
I think it's already over, our knowledge in most areas isn't really increasing any more, just becoming vastly more efficient.

Exactly my thoughts!
 
  • #15
"If" is the key word here

hypnagogue said:
Don't be so quick to ditch the engineers! If quantum computing pans out, we may well have virtually unlimited computational power at our fingertips. Completely understanding the brain is probably the most difficult scientific task ahead of us, and I would bet it's going to take a long time to figure out, singularity or not.

Hypnog, "If"is definitely th ekey word here. "If" humanity continues to survive and progress technologically, intellectually and emotionally onward into the future then all things possible are feasible for humanity to reproduce-- e.g. creation of biological life or baby universe --however, in this vast Universe we have not received any signals from other humanitys or other intellingent biologic life,

...we have no cofirmed vistors from the future either.

It may be that humanity or intelleigent biologic life forms, here or elsewhere, have not or will not continue far enough into their futures to fufill those seeming impossible possibilites.

Human like "Artificial Intelligence" may actually be potential savior of many biologic civilizations through out Universe as human intellect sometimes appears to be lacking what it takes for longterm survival much less technological advancement.

Rybo
 
  • #16
Of course, further advances are contingent upon the continued survival of our species. One can only hope.
 
  • #17
Ivan Seeking said:
Do you remember back in the early 70's when TB got busted for selling horse meat? Anyway, OT.

I didn't even know Taco Bell existed in the early 70's! I'm trying to remember when I heard of the first one opening up near my home...I might have already been out of high school. Anyway, best guess is the first time I heard of it was probably late 80s, early 90s. I thought they were a newer chain! :bugeye:

I'd rather have horsemeat than roaches though. At least horsemeat is still meat!
 
  • #18
Tongans are pretty big on horse meat too...
 
  • #19
Yes, I know horse meat is okay to eat, maybe even quite tasty - like a big, green, crunchy piece of frozen broccoli - but it was illegal and culturally unacceptable. Moonbear, I remember a TB near our house as early as the late 60's, so I checked.

HISTORY: Originated by Glen Bell, Taco Bell became a reality on March 21, 1962. The first Taco Bell restaurant was built in Downey, California and the first franchise was sold in 1964.
http://www.tacobell.com/

This was just down the road from my home back then.

hypnagogue said:
Of course, further advances are contingent upon the continued survival of our species. One can only hope.

Synthesis: It depends on how many people eat at TB. :biggrin:

Funny, right now we are poised for something approaching immortality, with talk of 400+ year lifespans, or even more, and at the same time, potential extinction. Which way will it go? I can hardly wait to find out! Woudln't it be funny if we found the key to eternal life just as the planet dies? :smile: Sounds like a German movie plot to me!

When we have had these sorts of discussions in the past, most people do see us becoming borg-like.

This is a strange thread. :biggrin:
 
  • #20
Horse meat is beautiful!
 
  • #21
Chronos said:
You speak as if you assume I never thought of that. The only way frozen jello works is if you freeze it with a hole through which to drive the nail. I protest that as a rule violation. You then have jello suspended by a nail driven into a tree, not jello nailed to a tree. Unless you have perfect geometry and timing, you cannot nail frozen jello to a tree without fracturing it... er, I never actually tried this myself. It just so happens I was sitting in the park one day when this guy wearing a carpenter's belt and carrying a cooler walked up to this tree I was under and... did I mention the part where the apple fell on my head?

Use heated nails and pound very lightly.

Also, you could just grab a box of jello and nail it to a tree. It's really not so hard. :rolleyes: [Since Jello is really a brand name this is qualifies, technically]

What the heck...this thread was shot anyway. :biggrin:
 
  • #22
actually it is totally culturally acceptable to eat horsemeat in Tonga but it freaks the euros out so i think they outlawed it and now they only do it on special occassions much like cannibalism in pre colonial days except then it was to show your enemies that you weren't to be messed with and also to absorb the mana of a great warrior.

I do hope you all know what mana is...
 
  • #23
i was about to post a serious reply here, but it's general discussion, so after a few post I lost courage. let's talk about horsemeat..
 
  • #24
I think the horsemeat has been played out...

...let's hear your serious reply remcook, it's probably even funnier :smile:
 
  • #25
it had something to do with sheep ;)
 
  • #26
Dolly and her sisters?? :-p :biggrin: Why not eat genetically modified meat??As long as it was alive at some point...

Daniel.
 
  • #27
Chronos said:
You speak as if you assume I never thought of that. The only way frozen jello works is if you freeze it with a hole through which to drive the nail. I protest that as a rule violation. You then have jello suspended by a nail driven into a tree, not jello nailed to a tree. Unless you have perfect geometry and timing, you cannot nail frozen jello to a tree without fracturing it... er, I never actually tried this myself. It just so happens I was sitting in the park one day when this guy wearing a carpenter's belt and carrying a cooler walked up to this tree I was under and... did I mention the part where the apple fell on my head?

That sounds like a challenge. Expect to hear from me in the next few days :biggrin:
 
  • #28
matthyaouw said:
That sounds like a challenge. Expect to hear from me in the next few days :biggrin:

But can you lick your elbows while nailing jello to a tree?
 
  • #29
It would be very sad if the end of science was near, when there's more than a 50% of the population that is so low in scientific knowledge. What I forecast, is an increase in the rapidity of learning (and I'm thinking for example in cybernetic implants in the brain a la Johnny Mnemonic). In fact, the cyborg Kevin Warwick has wild dreams to implant a chip in his brain in 2015
 
  • #30
Ivan Seeking said:
Woudln't it be funny if we found the key to eternal life just as the planet dies? :smile: Sounds like a German movie plot to me!

It wouldn't be complete without something completely bizarre but intended to be profound, like ending off with a fade-out from a mushroom cloud to a black and white scene of a nun sipping tea in a hospital with a chimpanzee that's wearing a derby. Also, the main character looks something like http://www.ms.uky.edu/~sills/dieter.jpg from the SNL skit Sprockets. :biggrin:

"In your film Irritant Number Four, the only images were that of a baby's head and a toilet. Did you mean for me to scream?"
- Dieter
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K