Electric field outside two concentric sphere's

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electric field behavior between two concentric metallic spheres, P and Q, where P is positively charged and Q is grounded. The field between the spheres is constant but not homogeneous, while the field outside sphere Q is zero due to the cancellation of charges. Gauss' Law is applied to explain that the field inside sphere P is zero, and the field inside sphere Q is not zero because it encloses charge. The grounding of sphere Q results in a total potential of zero, as it balances the electric field created by sphere P.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric fields and potentials
  • Knowledge of concentric spherical conductors
  • Basic principles of charge distribution in grounded conductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Gauss' Law in various geometries
  • Explore the concept of electric field cancellation in grounded conductors
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields in spherical coordinates
  • Investigate the implications of grounding on electric potential
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields in conductive materials.

bulbanos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
We've got two concentric metallic spheres, let's say P and Q
P is the smallest one, so its inside Q
Q is grounded and P is positive charged

I figured out that the field in between P and Q is not homogeneous but constant. But why is the field outside Q zero while it is not inside Q? Still the field is zero inside P because of the Gauss' Law...
I just don't see the profound difference between the two spheres.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the field in between P and Q is not homogeneous but constant.

You sure it is constant? :confused: I don't think so... a paralleled metal plate will riase a constant E field in between, but not for a concentric sphere.. You may want to check your calcultion, the field should be similar to a point charge in free space :approve:

But why is the field outside Q zero while it is not inside Q? Still the field is zero inside P because of the Gauss' Law...

The field inside the Q is not zero is also because of gauss law.. draw an gaussian surface in between P and Q, the charge enclosed in the gaussian surface is surely not zero, [tex]Q_{enclosed}/ \epsilon = \int \vec{E} d \vec{S}[/tex].. so how could [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] be zero?

why is the field outside Q zero

Q carries negative charge and P carries positive charge.. and there E field cancels out.. Question: Where did the negative charge come from?
 
Last edited:
If "constant" means "does not vary in time" (after equilibrium, obviously) then bulbanos is right. After equilibrium there is an electroSTATIC field.

The external sphere is grounded then V_Q=0. But this sphere is in the electrical field created by P (q/4/pi/eps_0/R_Q). R_Q is the radius of external sphere In order to have a zero potential, external sphere will get -q from Earth and will have its own potential -q/4/pi/eps_0/R_Q. The total potential of Q will be now given by the sum between the potential of the field from P and the potential from its own field that is 0.

In any external point, the field is zero because the electrical charge inside the Gaussian surface containing this point is 0: q+(-q)=0. (see the post of vincentchan for the Gauss' law)
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K