Primes in ring of Gauss integers - help

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the polynomial \(x^2 + x + 1\) in relation to the ring of algebraic integers \(R = \mathbb{Z}[\zeta]\), where \(\zeta = \frac{1}{2}(-1+\sqrt{-3})\), and its roots in finite fields \(F_p\). Participants explore the conditions under which the polynomial has roots in \(F_p\) and the implications for prime ideals in \(R\).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to show that \(x^2 + x + 1\) has a root in \(F_p\) if and only if \(p \equiv 1 \mod 3\) by proving two steps related to elements of order 3 in \(F_p\).
  • Another participant suggests reviewing the problem and definitions, indicating a lack of connection in the initial claims made.
  • A participant clarifies that if \(a\) is a root of \(x^2 + x + 1\), then \(a\) is also a root of \(x^3 - 1\), implying \(a^3 = 1\) and that \(a\) has order 3.
  • Further, a participant mentions a second part of the problem regarding the prime ideal \((p)\) in \(R\) and its relation to \(p \equiv -1 \mod 3\), suggesting that the first part of the problem applies.
  • Another participant introduces a related problem that utilizes quadratic reciprocity to show that \(p\) must be of the form \(3k + 1\) for certain conditions to hold.
  • One participant discusses a group homomorphism from the multiplicative group \(F_p - \{0\}\) and its implications for the existence of primitive cube roots of unity in \(F_p\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the connections between the polynomial roots, the properties of the ring \(R\), and the implications for prime ideals. There is no consensus on the best approach to the problem, and multiple competing perspectives are present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential confusion regarding definitions and the connections between various mathematical concepts, indicating that assumptions may be missing or unclear.

T-O7
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Primes in ring of Gauss integers - help!

I'm having a very difficult time solving this question, please help!
So I'm dealing with the ring [tex]R=\field{Z}[\zeta][/tex] where
[tex]\zeta=\frac{1}{2}(-1+\sqrt{-3})[/tex]
is a cube root of 1.
Then the question is:
Show the polynomial [tex]x^2+x+1[/tex] has a root in [tex]F_p[/tex] if and only if [tex]p\equiv1 (mod 3)[/tex].

I thought i could show this in two steps, by showing that:
a) a solves [tex]x^2+x=-1(mod p)[/tex] if and only if a is an element of order 3 in [tex]F^x_p[/tex].
b)[tex]F^x_p[/tex] contains an element of order 3 if and only if [tex]p\equiv1 (mod 3)[/tex].

I've proved part b, but i can't seem to get a hold of a.
Please help :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, first I think you need to review the problem and definitions... the things you've said don't seem to connect to one another.


Anyways, I think this might help: note that

x^3 - 1 = (x - 1) (x^2 + x + 1)
 
Hmm...sorry, i don't see what you mean.
 
It means that if a is a root of x^2 + x + 1, then it is also a root of x^3 - 1. (i.e. it is a cube root of 1)
 
ah, so a^3=1, and a has order 3. We can apply the argument backwards, and that will prove a). I see, thanks Hurkyl! :smile:
There's also a second part to this problem, which says (p) is prime ideal in R if and only if p=-1 (mod 3)
Apparently the first part of this problem applies, but i'll have to think about this more.
 
Ah, so that's why you mentioned R.

(Incidentally, I think you meant algebraic integers, not Gaussian integers)

I don't know if it will help, but note that if Fp has a root of x^2 + x + 1, then there is a homomorphism from R onto Fp.
 
I was looking at a somewhat similar problem, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=60863

You use quadratic reciprocity on [tex]X^2\equiv-3[/tex] Mod p to discover that p is of the form 3k+1. Thus, this prime splits over a field with[tex]\sqrt{-3},[/tex]so it would not generate a prime ideal.

Example: [tex]7=2^2+2+1=(2-\zeta)(2-\zeta^2)[/tex]

By the way, as Hurkyl points out, this is an algebratic number theory problem.
 
Last edited:
this is elementary. look at the group homomorphism from the multiplicative group Fp - {0} to itself defined by cubing. then if there is a primitive cube root of 1, the map is 3 to 1, and has image of order 1/3 the order of the group, i.e. then 3 divides p-1. on the other hand if 3 divides the order of the group, it is elementary group theory that there exists an element of order 3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K