| New Reply |
chemical potential vs pressure and temperature; difficulty with Fermi gases |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May17-12, 08:29 PM | #18 |
|
|
chemical potential vs pressure and temperature; difficulty with Fermi gases
So.. in 1D,
The fermi energy [itex]E_{f}[/itex] can be expressed in terms of the Fermi pressure [itex]P_{f}[/itex] using the expression for the internal energy [itex]U[/itex] at absolute zero. If we differentiate the internal energy [itex]U[/itex] with respect to the length of the 1D box [itex]L[/itex] and add a negative sign, we have an expression for the pressure. [itex]P = -(\frac{\partial U}{\partial L})_{\sigma,N}[/itex] In 1D at absolute zero... [itex]U = \frac{1}{3} N E_{f}[/itex] where [itex]E_{f} = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{8 m}(\frac{N \pi}{L})^{2}[/itex] From these expressions, we can express the Fermi energy in terms of the pressure at absolute zero. [itex]E_{f} = (\frac{3 \pi}{2})^{\frac{2}{3}}(\frac{\hbar^{2}}{8 m})^{\frac{1}{3}} P^{\frac{2}{3}} = C_{1} P^{\frac{2}{3}}[/itex] Then the expression for the chemical potential becomes [itex]\mu ≈ C_{1} P^{\frac{2}{3}} + \frac{\pi^{2}}{12} \frac{\tau^{2}}{C_{1} P^{\frac{2}{3}}}[/itex] With this as our form for the chemical potential, we see that it does decrease with temperature at constant pressure and particle number. I'm pretty sure I've got it right this time, but feel free to correct me. Does this make sense? -James |
| May18-12, 10:32 AM | #19 |
|
Recognitions:
|
No, you need the expansion of U or P in T in the same order as that for mu.
Come on, it's not so difficult... |
| May21-12, 05:42 AM | #20 |
|
Recognitions:
|
[itex] E_F \approx C_1 P^{2/3}(1-\frac{\pi^2 k^2T^2}{9 (C_1P^{2/3})^2})[/itex]
Sufficient to render the dependence of mu on T negative. |
| May21-12, 07:18 AM | #21 |
|
|
could you show how you derived this? -James |
| May21-12, 08:10 AM | #22 |
|
Recognitions:
|
[itex] Lp=-\Omega=\frac{2}{\beta}\int_0^\infty d\omega D(\omega) \ln (1 +\exp(-\beta(\omega-\mu)) [/itex] Here, [itex] \Omega [/itex] is the grand potential, D is the density of states [itex] L\frac{\sqrt{2m}}{\pi \hbar}\omega^{-1/2}=AL \omega^{-1/2}[/itex] with [itex]A=\alpha_1^{-1/2}/2[/itex]. Partial integration: [itex] p=-\frac{2A}{\beta} \int_0^\infty d\omega \left(\int_0^\omega d\omega' \omega'^{-1/2} \right) \frac{-\beta}{\exp(\beta(\omega-\mu))+1} [/itex] Sommerfeld expansion... [itex]p\approx A\left[ \frac{3}{2}E_F^{3/2}+\frac{\pi^2}{6\beta^2}E_F^{-1/2}\right] [/itex] Solve for E_F at same level of accuracy. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: chemical potential vs pressure and temperature; difficulty with Fermi gases
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Fermi energy (in semiconducors) vs. chemical potential | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 2 | ||
| Electrochemical potential, chemical potential and Fermi levels. Ashcroft is confusing | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 0 | ||
| Chemical Potential & Fermi Energy | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 3 | ||
| Degenerate Fermi temperature of 2 fermionic gases | Introductory Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Low Temperature Expansion of Chemical Potential | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 1 | ||