New Reply

chemical potential vs pressure and temperature; difficulty with Fermi gases

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May17-12, 08:29 PM   #18
 

chemical potential vs pressure and temperature; difficulty with Fermi gases


So.. in 1D,

The fermi energy [itex]E_{f}[/itex] can be expressed in terms of the Fermi pressure [itex]P_{f}[/itex] using the expression for the internal energy [itex]U[/itex] at absolute zero. If we differentiate the internal energy [itex]U[/itex] with respect to the length of the 1D box [itex]L[/itex] and add a negative sign, we have an expression for the pressure.

[itex]P = -(\frac{\partial U}{\partial L})_{\sigma,N}[/itex]

In 1D at absolute zero...

[itex]U = \frac{1}{3} N E_{f}[/itex] where [itex]E_{f} = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{8 m}(\frac{N \pi}{L})^{2}[/itex]

From these expressions, we can express the Fermi energy in terms of the pressure at absolute zero.

[itex]E_{f} = (\frac{3 \pi}{2})^{\frac{2}{3}}(\frac{\hbar^{2}}{8 m})^{\frac{1}{3}} P^{\frac{2}{3}} = C_{1} P^{\frac{2}{3}}[/itex]

Then the expression for the chemical potential becomes

[itex]\mu ≈ C_{1} P^{\frac{2}{3}} + \frac{\pi^{2}}{12} \frac{\tau^{2}}{C_{1} P^{\frac{2}{3}}}[/itex]

With this as our form for the chemical potential, we see that it does decrease with temperature at constant pressure and particle number.

I'm pretty sure I've got it right this time, but feel free to correct me. Does this make sense?

-James
 
May18-12, 10:32 AM   #19
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
No, you need the expansion of U or P in T in the same order as that for mu.
Come on, it's not so difficult...
 
May21-12, 05:42 AM   #20
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
[itex] E_F \approx C_1 P^{2/3}(1-\frac{\pi^2 k^2T^2}{9 (C_1P^{2/3})^2})[/itex]
Sufficient to render the dependence of mu on T negative.
 
May21-12, 07:18 AM   #21
 
Quote by DrDu View Post
[itex] E_F \approx C_1 P^{2/3}(1-\frac{\pi^2 k^2T^2}{9 (C_1P^{2/3})^2})[/itex]
Sufficient to render the dependence of mu on T negative.

could you show how you derived this?

-James
 
May21-12, 08:10 AM   #22
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by jfizzix View Post
could you show how you derived this?

-James

[itex] Lp=-\Omega=\frac{2}{\beta}\int_0^\infty d\omega D(\omega) \ln (1 +\exp(-\beta(\omega-\mu)) [/itex]
Here, [itex] \Omega [/itex] is the grand potential, D is the density of states [itex] L\frac{\sqrt{2m}}{\pi \hbar}\omega^{-1/2}=AL \omega^{-1/2}[/itex] with [itex]A=\alpha_1^{-1/2}/2[/itex].
Partial integration:
[itex]
p=-\frac{2A}{\beta} \int_0^\infty d\omega \left(\int_0^\omega d\omega' \omega'^{-1/2} \right) \frac{-\beta}{\exp(\beta(\omega-\mu))+1} [/itex]
Sommerfeld expansion...
[itex]p\approx A\left[ \frac{3}{2}E_F^{3/2}+\frac{\pi^2}{6\beta^2}E_F^{-1/2}\right] [/itex]
Solve for E_F at same level of accuracy.
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: chemical potential vs pressure and temperature; difficulty with Fermi gases
Thread Forum Replies
Fermi energy (in semiconducors) vs. chemical potential Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
Electrochemical potential, chemical potential and Fermi levels. Ashcroft is confusing Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Chemical Potential & Fermi Energy Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 3
Degenerate Fermi temperature of 2 fermionic gases Introductory Physics Homework 0
Low Temperature Expansion of Chemical Potential Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1