What is the speed of the ball immediately before it strikes the ground?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of a ball shot vertically upwards and its speed just before it strikes the ground. The context includes concepts from kinematics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a kinematic formula to find the final velocity, questioning the sign of gravitational acceleration. Some participants suggest using energy conservation principles instead, noting that the ball's kinetic energy at launch can be related to its speed just before impact.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to solve the problem, including both kinematic equations and energy arguments. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in finding time, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of energy conservation to simplify the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's intention to verify their understanding by using multiple methods, and the discussion includes hints about the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy without resolving the problem directly.

rmackay
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am new here, and am not expecting any direct answers (I read the sticky) but I am pretty confused about this one question:
A ball is shot vertically upwards at 10m/s from a height of 5m above the ground, If friction can be ignored, what is the speed of the ball immediately before it strikes the ground?

I need to know if the formula I am using is correct:
Vf= Vi+g.T
would g (9.8m/s2) be -9.8m/s2 for this question because it uses deceleration?
thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
It is certainly A correct formula, and if you choose Vi to be positive (that is, upwards direction positive), you should definitely use the negative -9.8.

However, as yet, T is also an unknown, not only Vf!
So, (it seems..) you need yet another equation in order to close your system.
Do you have any idea as to what that might be?
 
Your formula is correct; the acceleration due to gravity is constant, so the total change in acceleration from launch to landing is gt.

However, you're going about this problem the hard way, since you'd need to find t first to use your formula, and finding t in this case could be a bit complicated.

How about using an energy argument instead? The ball begins with a specific amount of kinetic energy, which it trades for altitude as it rises to the top of its trajectory. It then begins to fall, and trades that altitude back into kinetic energy.

Since there is no friction, no energy is lost. The ball is going the same speed when it was launched upwards from 5 m altitude as when falling downward past 5 m altitude. In other words, it's going 10 m/s downwards as it passes 5 m altitude.

Now, the problem is significantly simplified! All you need to do is determine how much speed the ball would gain in falling the additional 5 meters to the ground, then add it to 10 m/s it had at 5 m altitude.

This doesn't require time at all; all you need to do is figure out how much gravitational potential energy the ball lost in moving downwards 5 meters ([itex]= mg\Delta h[/itex]). All of that gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy (so [itex]mg\Delta h = (1/2) m(\Delta v)^2[/itex]). Can you solve that equation for [itex]\Delta v[/itex]?

Hint: This is an extremely common sort of thing to be asked in a high-school physics class -- how much speed does a ball gain in falling x meters. You might want to remember the very simple formula you'll find.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
I fully concur with chroot here; an energy argument is definitely the simplest (I gave an oblique hint to that).

However, if you are at the beginning of learning physics, it can be quite helpful to verify that energy arguments and a plodding solution of Newton's second law directly gives the same answers (which must "obviously" be true)
 
t = (2 ðy/g)1/2
to get the time?
 
Finding the time (if you decide to go that route) involves solving the position equation:

[tex]y(t) = y_0 + v_0 t + \frac{1}{2} g t^2[/tex]

where [itex]y_0 = 5[/itex] and [itex]v_0 = 10[/itex].

- Warren
 
I think I am going to use both methods so I am sure that I am correct, it will take a while, but at least I will know how to answer this type of question in the future! I will be sure to remember what a energy argument is!
thanks again!
 
Last edited:
rmackay:

Feel free to post your intermediate results for us, so we can make sure you stay on the right track. :smile:

- Warren
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K