## Critical point exponents inequalities - The Rushbrooke inequality

The Rushbrooke inequality: $$H=0, T\rightarrow T_c^-$$

$$C_H \geq \frac{T\{(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T})_H\}^2}{\chi_T}$$
$$\epsilon=\frac{T-T_c}{T_c}$$

$$C_H \sim (-\epsilon)^{-\alpha'}$$
$$\chi_T \sim (-\epsilon)^{-\gamma'}$$
$$M \sim (-\epsilon)^{\beta}$$
$$(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T})_H \sim (-\epsilon)^{\beta-1}$$

$$(-\epsilon)^{-\alpha'} \geq \frac{(-\epsilon)^{2\beta-2}}{(-\epsilon)^{-\gamma'}}$$

and we get Rushbrooke inequality
$$\alpha'+2\beta+\gamma' \geq 2$$
My only problem here is first step

$$C_H \geq \frac{T\{(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T})_H\}^2}{\chi_T}$$
we get this from identity
$$\chi_T(C_H-C_M)=T\alpha_H^2$$
But I don't know how?
 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Study provides better understanding of water's freezing behavior at nanoscale>> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives>> Promising doped zirconia
 Any idea? Problem is with $$\chi_T(C_H-C_M)=T\alpha^2_H$$ from that relation we obtain $$C_H=\frac{T\alpha^2_H}{\chi_T}+C_M$$ So if $$C_M>0$$ than $$C_H>\frac{T\alpha^2_H}{\chi_T}$$ Equality is in the game if and only if $$C_M=0$$. Or when $$(\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial T^2})_M=0$$. Is that possible? F is Helmholtz free energy. Can you tell me something more about that physically?