Hurricane Force Wind Speed: Physics Student Exercise

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter infraray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hurricane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of wind speed required to lift a person off the ground, particularly focusing on the mechanics of drag forces, lift generation, and the role of air pressure. Participants explore various approaches to understand the problem, including Bernoulli's equation and drag coefficients, while considering different body positions and conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the claim that 120 mph is necessary to lift a person, suggesting that the lift could be generated by a pressure differential created by wind flow, particularly if air is trapped underneath the person.
  • Another participant mentions that terminal velocity for a person lying flat is around 120-130 mph, implying that this speed could correspond to the wind speed needed for lift.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of air pockets and pressure, with one noting that without air, a person would be vacuum-sealed to the ground, while others argue about the nature of air pockets under a person.
  • One participant asserts that a person is not shaped like a wing, suggesting that wind parallel to the ground would not generate lift.
  • A participant from a non-English background provides a detailed mathematical approach, discussing drag forces, friction, and the conditions necessary for lift, concluding with an approximate calculation of wind speed needed for movement.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of transient aerodynamics, emphasizing that the problem involves complexities that are not captured by steady-state models, referencing real-world examples from helicopter dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of lifting a person with wind speed, with some supporting the idea that sufficient wind could create lift while others contest this notion. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the mechanics involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their calculations and assumptions, including the need for precise definitions of conditions, the geometry of the problem, and the complexities of transient aerodynamics that may not be fully addressed in their discussions.

infraray
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Someone at work had stated that it would take a wind speed of 120mph to lift a person lying on the ground into the air. I was curious and set out to find out if this was accurate. I am having some difficulty. In order to figure this out how does one equate wind speed to force. I am a beginning physics student in college and am trying to exercise my skills. Do I figure this out as a drag coefficient problem? Or perhaps maybe this problem is more complex than I am prepared for, but I am curious. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never thought of trying to solve this for a person lying flat, but the first thing I thought of was to apply a Bernoulli equation. If the man is laying flat, a pocket of air should be trapped underneath him and it should be fairly stationary. If the air above him is building, this should create a differential in pressure, generating lift. When the amount of lift is greater than the weight of the individual, up he comes!
 
As far as I know, the terminal velocity of a person is around 120-130 mph in the horizontal posture.

Terminal velocity is the point at which the upward drag force equals the downward gravitational force -- so it makes sense. It would take a 120 mph or so wind to levitate a person.

- Warren
 
Lurch,

I just lay down on the floor on
my stomach, and also on my back.

The only possible pocket of air
was the very small one in my
navel.

What are you shaped like?
 
Originally posted by zoobyshoe
Lurch,

I just lay down on the floor on
my stomach, and also on my back.

The only possible pocket of air
was the very small one in my
navel.

What are you shaped like?

LOL!

But there must be air in there, otherwise you'd be vaccum-sealed to the ground. If you were to lay on the ground and remove all the air from underneath yourself (and I'm not for one instant suggesting that you should), then for every square inch of your "sunny-side", there would be about 14lbs of air pressure pushing down no you. It is very unlikely you would be able to get up again.
 
Originally posted by LURCH
LOL!

But there must be air in there, otherwise you'd be vaccum-sealed to the ground. If you were to lay on the ground and remove all the air from underneath yourself (and I'm not for one instant suggesting that you should), then for every square inch of your "sunny-side", there would be about 14lbs of air pressure pushing down no you. It is very unlikely you would be able to get up again.
I see what you mean now. It's not
a monocoque pocket, but a million
little pockets that prevent you
from getting stuck. I think wear-
ing clothes helps, too.
 
A person isn't a wing. No amount of wind will lift a person off the ground if the wind is parralel to the ground.
 
Hi! First of all sorry for my bad english. I am spanish and i am in the "first stages" of learning it.
I am going to answer the problem, but I have to say to the truth that only russ_watters seems to be near of the correct answer.
Well, it is imposible that a lift is created only with a flow of wind parallel to the ground. Of course, it would be possible if there were a gap of air beneath the surface in contact with the ground. Then we could apply Bernoulli's equation in order to evaluate the difference of pressures and calculate the lift force.
But the problem I think it is a person standing on the ground. His shoes are in contact with the ground's surface. Then, two forces are acting over him: friction force (between ground and shoes) and drag force (created by the flow). Well, this is the demostration in which i state that the figure of 100 mph isn't so far of the truth.
Under the assumption of Reynold's Number too large (Re>>>1), the viscous forces can be neglected. Then, the force balance results:
d=density of air (it's of the order of 1,24 Kg/m3
U=velocity of the flow of air (unknown)
M=mass of the man (of the order of 75 Kg)
g=9,8m/s2
k=friction coefficient between shoes and ground (of the order of 0,02)
A= Transversal area of the man (of the order of 50cm2)
As an approximate calculation the pressure (drag) forces are of the order of AdU^2 where ^ means "powered to".
So AdU^2 = kMg to start the dragging movement.
Clarifying the velocity U=sqrt(kMg/Ad)=46 m/s = 104 Mph where sqrt means "square root".
Of course, this calculation is approximate, so to obtain the exact solution it is necessary to know the geometry of the problem (boundary conditions) and the initial conditions, in order to equate and resolve the Momentum Equation of the Fluid Mechanics (it would be too difficult!)
 
Such a problem involves transient aerodynamics. Using a drag coefficient found for a person (in say, a wind tunnel) or terminal velocity values as some other posters have done invariably refer to a steady-state value.

Transient aerodynamics is not an trivial matter, its modelling is best done computationally. Another example of a transient aerodyamic effect is 'Jump aerodynamics', first discovered by Vietnam helo pilots, who found that they could get their helicopters to lift off even though they exceeded the maximum take-off weight slightly, by giving the collective (not the cyclic!) a shove. Quite a handy thing for an experienced chopper pilot to know, especially if they were medevac'ing one extra injured soldier over the MTOW Ask if you want the explanation, if enough ask I'll explain it.

Paying attention in otherwise [zz)] Helicopter Dynamics lectures helps :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K