Why Does Ohm's Law Hold in Resistive Materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DougBTX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of Ohm's Law and its applicability to resistive materials, comparing it to fundamental laws like Newton's laws. Participants explore the empirical basis of Ohm's Law, its derivation from charge carrier behavior, and the implications of these points on the classification of physical laws.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that Ohm's Law is an empirical description rather than a fundamental law, suggesting it shares similarities with other empirical laws like Hooke's Law.
  • Others propose that Ohm's Law can be derived from Maxwell's equations, indicating a deeper connection to fundamental principles compared to Newton's laws.
  • One participant questions the validity of debating the nature of Ohm's Law without sufficient context, implying that the discussion may lack clarity.
  • Another participant explains that Ohm's Law holds because the current density quickly reaches a steady state due to frequent collisions between charge carriers, which balances the effects of the electric field.
  • There is a suggestion that the surprising nature of Ohm's Law is due to the rapid propagation of changes in the wire, leading to a steady current despite the acceleration of charges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the fundamental nature of Ohm's Law compared to Newton's laws, with no clear consensus on whether one is more fundamental than the other. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification of these laws.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of "fundamental" and the assumptions regarding the behavior of charge carriers in different materials. The discussion also highlights the complexity of deriving Ohm's Law from other principles.

DougBTX
Paul Tipler said:
Ohm's law is not a fundamental law of nature, like Newton's laws or the laws of thermodynamics, but rather an empirical description of a property shared by many materials

This sounds wrong to me - Ohm's laws don't apply to all materials, but Newton's laws don't apply at all speeds; what makes one more "fundamental" than the other? Is it just that it took longer for people to find exceptions?

Douglas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he had in mind the fact that Ohm's law can be derived from a description of the behavior of charge carriers and their interaction with the material, which are basically an application of Mazwell's equations, while Newton's laws are not explained from other ("more basic") principles. In the case of Newton's laws, you either start from them, or replace them with a new description of spacetime itself.
 
Doug,

Is there any context to those comments? I think it's pointless to "debate" the matter without some context.
 
Ohms law is an empirical statement, like hookes law, "the current density is proportional to the applied force". Since the applied force is an electric voltage:

J = s*E where s is the conductivity, J is the current density and E is the electric field. This is the real ohms law, from which it is possible to derive V =IR.

If you think about it, it is surprising that ohm's law should ever hold. E accelerates charges, so as they accelerate, the current should go up! Then V = IR would depend on how long V has been running.

The solution of course (because ohm's empirical law fits the data) is that changes in the wire propagate so fast, the current quickly settles into a steady state due to collisions between electrons balancing the net acceleration due to the E field.

This is adapted from Grifith's Electrodynamics, which is a great book. He explains it better than I do.

Anyway, it should be easy now to see why Newtons laws are more fundamental (not absolutely fundamental of course) than Ohms Law.
 
Crosson,

If you think about it, it is surprising that ohm's law should ever hold. E accelerates charges, so as they accelerate, the current should go up!

Not really. The point of Ohm's Law is that in a resistive medium a charge carrier (electron) experiences so many collisions that it very quickly achieves terminal velocity (aka drift velocity). Essentially, the current density will be a function of the applied electric field [j = j(E)] and, to lowest order, the current density varies directly with E with the proportionality constant being defined as the conductivity in an isotropic medium (it's a tensor in anisotropic media).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
793
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K