Uncovering the Mysteries of the Universe: Questions, Answers, and Theories

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around fundamental questions about the nature of the universe, including its structure (open or closed, infinite or finite), the existence of dark energy and dark matter, and the constants that govern it. Participants explore the criteria for qualifying theories, the selection process for determining which theories are correct, and the possibility of achieving a perfect model of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the universe is open or closed, infinite or finite, and whether dark energy and dark matter exist.
  • There is a suggestion that a theory is useful if it can make experimentally testable predictions, with specific tests depending on the theory's focus.
  • One participant proposes that when competing theories exist, experiments should be conducted to measure their predictions, while noting that some theories may turn out to be equivalent.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that theories are proposed through various means, and once they aim to explain phenomena, they become theories, with a focus on published theories being more significant.
  • Participants discuss the selection of theories, indicating that experiments and past evidence are crucial, and that disproven theories should be discarded.
  • There is a debate about the concept of a "perfect model" of the universe, with one participant suggesting that while a perfect model may be analogous to a set of rules, a comprehensive recounting of all historical events may be unattainable due to incomplete records.
  • One participant expresses the belief that while the universe may be infinitely divisible, mathematical descriptions will always be imperfect, using the metaphor of zooming into the Mandelbrot Set to illustrate this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of the universe and the criteria for qualifying theories. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the possibility of achieving a perfect model of the universe.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "perfect model" and the acknowledgment that some theories may lack testability without new data. The discussion also highlights the incomplete nature of historical records in both physics and evolutionary biology.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
their are so many questions and so few answers, is the universe open
closed? is it infinite or finite? does dark energy, dark matter exist?
What are the constants that govern our universe? I have read many
papers that tweek known parameters, or invoke new theories, most
have no testability without more new data, or may be impossible to
disprove.
So my question is what tests are needed to qualify a theory?
How do you select which theory is correct?
what tests are needed to aid a selection?
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
what tests are needed to qualify a theory?
A theory is useful if it can make predictions which are experimentally testable. Specific tests depend on what the theory is about.
How do you select which theory is correct?
what tests are needed to aid a selection?
When there are competing theories, they will usually make predictions which are different. Perform the experiment measuring them. Alternatively, theories that may look different turn out to be equivalent - example, quantum mechanics in the 1920's Heisenberg and Schroedinger.
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?
Ever is a long time, but based on past experience, it is highly unlikely.
 
wolram said:
their are so many questions and so few answers, is the universe open
closed? is it infinite or finite? does dark energy, dark matter exist?
What are the constants that govern our universe? I have read many
papers that tweek known parameters, or invoke new theories, most
have no testability without more new data, or may be impossible to
disprove.


So my question is what tests are needed to qualify a theory?

Somebody writes a paper proposing it, orally proposes it, or thinks about it in their head. Once done if the statement is proposed to explain something it is a theory. Subcategories of theories are theories about physics and publish theories about physics. The really good theories of physics of any significant duration are published theories about physics.

How do you select which theory is correct?

You do experiments and look at past evidence. You dump the theories that are disproven. You keep the rest in the running and use the ones that are convenient the most.

what tests are needed to aid a selection?

Logic and experimental experience.

can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?

What is a perfect model. If a perfect model is analogous to the rules of chess. Yes. If the perfect model is analagous to the rules of chess plus a recounting of every move that got us to how the board looks today, probably not.

Similarly, we may someday determine every method of genetic change that has ever taken place in evolutionary history. But, because the fossil record is incomplete there will be some species in our evolutionary history which may never be known.
 
wolram said:
can we ever have a perfect model of our universe?

I think the Universe is infinitely divisible but math will always be able to describe it although only imperfectly. The metaphor I use is zooming into the Mandelbrot Set attempting to find the connections between nested sets only to find they have grown smaller still !

SD
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Early Universe massive Black Holes question
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
High School Dark Energy: Are We All Missing The Obvious?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad The Heavier Elements: A Question About Their Abundance
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Graduate A pair of interesting papers: have counterarguments been published?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Stargazing Expanding Universe: A New Theory on Dark Energy, Black Holes & More
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Multiverse theory with impossible universes?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Can Dark Matter Explain Black Holes and the Mysterious Planet-Nine?
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
Undergrad Questions on the consequence of an evolving dark energy parameter
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Exploring the Troubles with Dark Matter and the Quest for a Theory of Everything
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Undergrad On Hubble's constant, the expansion of the Universe and vacuum energy
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K