Thread Closed

A Public Debate on Science, Pseudoscience, and Spiritualism

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan23-05, 05:36 PM   #1
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

A Public Debate on Science, Pseudoscience, and Spiritualism


Articles
1 - Szilard’s Roots and His Interdisciplinarity, George Marx
4 - Voodoo Science: Perpetuum Mobile, Robert L. Park
5 - Magnet Therapy, A.R. Liboff
7 - A Public Debate on Science, Pseudoscience, and Spiritualism
from the Perspectives of a Physicist, Sociologist, and Biologist,
Alan Scott, Bob Salt, Ken Parejko...

...Most of us have had experiences that science cannot explain. As Dr. Salt points out, to deny the spiritual aspect of life is to deny an important, fundamental and true part of our being. But though I can’t speak for him myself, it seems to me that Dr. Scott is not denying spirituality. He is questioning aspects of modern life that are anti- or pseudoscientific and claim to be spiritual.. [p 9 of 16][continued]
http://www.physics.pomona.edu/facult...s&SocOct98.pdf
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: A Public Debate on Science, Pseudoscience, and Spiritualism
Thread Forum Replies
Presidential Debate on Science and Technology? Current Events 1
Hapgood pseudoscience Forum Feedback & Announcements 1
There is nothing spiritual about Spiritualism General Discussion 8
Science-as-public relations Current Events 0