Transmutation: Enhancing Disintigration Rates of α-Decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transmutation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of enhancing disintegration rates of alpha decay, exploring mechanisms and theories related to nuclear transmutation. Participants share ideas on potential methods, including the use of lasers and the influence of long-duration heating, while also referencing historical and philosophical perspectives on alchemy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that enhancing alpha decay rates could involve adjusting the nuclear potential barrier, either by lowering it or making it thinner.
  • One suggestion includes using high power density lasers with ultra-short pulses to potentially excite the inner electron shell or induce diffusion.
  • Another participant notes that the transmutation of mercury to gold is exothermic but has an extremely long mean life, suggesting that perturbing the barrier may not yield significant results.
  • There is speculation about the possibility of inducing resonance mechanisms to enhance decay rates, although no concrete examples are provided.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the philosophical aspects of alchemy influencing experimental outcomes, arguing for a more empirical approach.
  • One participant discusses the challenges of adding energy to alpha particles without causing them to exceed the barrier, drawing parallels to nuclear reactor operations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the effectiveness of proposed methods or the relevance of philosophical perspectives in experimental outcomes. Multiple competing ideas remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of resonance processes and the complexities of nuclear physics, indicating that some proposed mechanisms may not be well-defined or understood.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
203
Has anyone thought of a mechanism enhancing the disintigration rates of α-decay?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interested in alchemy?! You might want to check out the last excellent work by Dennis W. Hauck which suggests quite an intriguing -even though not exactly 'scientific'- perspective on the subject.

Beside that I guess the only way you can enhance such a process would be by going to 'talk' to the nuclei. Hence we either find a way to deform the inner electron shell or we have to create something 'seen' mostly by the nucleus.

To put it slightly better to enhance the rate we have to adjust the nuclear potential barrier to increase transmission through it. We either lower it or make it thinner.

Since alpha-emitting nuclei are pretty heavy to hope to get to achieve any significant inner shell polarization, my only idea would be to use one of those very high power density lasers, little energy ultra short pulses... or it might even be possible to tune a laser to excite some kind of diffusion from the inner shell only.

For now this is it. What about your ideas?
 
Not a concrete idea, really. Last year I noticed that the most popular transmutation between alchemists, those of Hg to Au, is actually exotermic. It goes Hg201->Pt197+Alpha->Au197+beta. But the mean life dor this to happen is as long as the life of the universe, according common model of alpha disintegration.

The alpha in Hg201 is just above E=0, thus deep under the barrier. So I guess that a perturbation of the barrier does not help a lot (BTW, the maximum enhancement with this method is recorded about 15-20% in very deformed atoms).

Perhaps it could be possible to take advantage of the near-threshold status of this alpha and to induce some resonance mechanism. I have never seen such beast, but who knows.

Who is Dennis Hauck? Url do u have 4 it?
 
Well I have not read much about modern alchemy but mostly works trying to bridge experiments and philosophy underlying the discipline.

By the way, one of the things that is apparent in the field is the role of very long periods at high temperature, something you never really do in ordinary chemistry, these days nobody works on experiments that encompass ten days or even months of heating for the sample. This is pretty much equivalent to say that our scientific laws sometimes do not have data for very slow processes - a low-frequency cut-off. In this respect it is really interesting to think of the famous 1/f noise as involved in the alchemical processes.

The other aspect of alchemical work is that it seems (see below about Hauck) that who perform the experiment is an integral component of the experiment: this is not a new concept at all as we know in QM, but even in classical physics not everybody is able to have their experiments working... and maybe there is more about this than simply not being fit for experimental work...

Not a concrete idea, really. Last year I noticed that the most popular transmutation between alchemists, those of Hg to Au, is actually exotermic. It goes Hg201->Pt197+Alpha->Au197+beta. But the mean life dor this to happen is as long as the life of the universe, according common model of alpha disintegration.

The alpha in Hg201 is just above E=0, thus deep under the barrier. So I guess that a perturbation of the barrier does not help a lot (BTW, the maximum enhancement with this method is recorded about 15-20% in very deformed atoms).

Well it was just an improvised guess, I am happy enough with a 15-20% for now. What is worth to remember is that even though the binding energies of nuclei are enormous, there are very low energy processes (thermal neutron bombardment) that make them incredibly unstable: when Fermi started bombarding uranium nuclei, nobody expected he would actually be able to break them into two big chunks... Thinking of nuclei as heavily charged liquid droplet helped a lot in those days

Perhaps it could be possible to take advantage of the near-threshold status of this alpha and to induce some resonance mechanism. I have never seen such beast, but who knows.

Well my knowledge of resonance processes in high energy physics is quite poor and even poorer for nuclear physics so... If you are referring to some mechanism by which our alpha is able to collect more and more energy by some oscillating source something like a multiphoton process still ultrashort laser pulses would be my choice... nevertheless I do not see how being near-theresold plays a role...
Or are you thinking to create a lot of these alpha states inside a nucleus? Promoting a lot of nucleons to bind into an alpha state would create some instability?

Who is Dennis Hauck? Url do u have 4 it?

Dennis Hauck (www.alchemylab.com) is an Austrian guy (now leaving in California) who has done plenty of research on alchemical science and his conclusion is that it was a science where the observer/alchemist was influencing the results of the experiment so deeply that the experiment outcome were actually portraying the status of the observer, something he likes to call his level of consciousness or evolution. A perfectly reasonable quantum mechanic possibility, only the experiment is observing the experimenter and not viceversa... Even though this might sound lot like phylosophy (and partly is) the guy casts a lot of light on experimental alchemy too and more important on the key to read the heavily symbolic language present in ancient texts. If you are used to 'understand' by a logic, detail-oriented, left brain approach this might just seem 'bull****' but if you complement this point of view with an analogy-based, synthetic, right brain approach, there are a lot of pieces of the puzzle that you can start putting together, a bigger picture come together that will sound intuitevely appealing; even though still hard to put down into equations it can be an excellent research guiding tool.
 
Pfff, of course there is a transmutation in the spirit of the alchemist... but it is not specific to alchemy, it happens in physics, in mathematics, in biology, hey, even in zoology!

I am afraid most of these guys use the spiritual stuff in order to
  • Explain lack of repeatability.
  • Avoid to do actual laboratory work.

Going back to the &alpha;, I must confess I have tryed to calculate both approaches... either to add more cold alpha particles looking for some effect, or also to attach an oscillating source... not to get more energy, but to pump the alpha inside and outside the potential well. In principle for Hg201 the level is so low that it is possible to put it inside E<0 and then again out to E>0 with only an small perturbation. In any case, I did not get to progress across the calculation.

Yep, external radiation, neutrons or so, could be used but it seems not very pretty. Some people says that the ancients found uranium casually. Well, it could be, as the main source was Joachimstahl, near Praga, a town crowded of alchemists. But most of the modern practicioners (and they are) believe it is a kind of solid-state efect, very much as Schwinger(?) proposals ten years ago in the "pseudofield" of cold fusion.

In any case the problem about adding energy is the same that in a nuclear reactor: if the alpha goes above the barrier it is going to be hot, so you need some kind of moderation. Tricky.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K