How is the Approximation of \( e^r \) Derived in Discrete Compounding?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the approximation of \( e^r \) in the context of discrete compounding interest. Participants explore the relationship between discrete compounding and continuous growth, particularly through the lens of differential equations and Taylor series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the approximation of \( e^r \) using limits and the definition of \( e \). Questions arise regarding the use of Taylor series and the reasoning behind the differential equation setup. There is also inquiry into the separation of variables technique in solving differential equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on specific mathematical concepts and methods. Some have provided insights into the approximation process and the separation of variables, while others continue to ask for further explanations and examples.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints related to the smallness of \( \frac{r}{m} \) in the approximation and the standard methods used in differential equations, indicating a focus on foundational mathematical principles.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

For discrete compunding, we have after n years [tex](1+r)^n[/tex] where r is the interest rate. IF we receive m interest payments at a rate of [tex]\frac {r}{m}[/tex] then our discrete compounding equation becomes [tex](1+ \frac{r}{m})^m = e^{m\log(1+(\frac{r}{m}))} \doteq e^r[/tex] After time t we will have [tex]e^{rt}[/tex]. My question is, how do they receive the approximation of [tex]e^r[/tex]? Could we look at this as a differential equation such that if we have an amount [tex]M(t)[/tex] in the bank at time t, how much will it increase from one day to another? So [tex]M(t+dt) - M(t) \doteq \frac{dM}{dt}dt + ...[/tex] How do we get the right hand side or approximation? I know it has something to do with a Taylor Series, but could someone please show me?

[tex]\frac{dM}{dt}dt = rM(t)dt[/tex] so [tex]\frac{dM}{dt} = rM(t)[/tex] Why do we multiply by [tex]dt[/tex] in the differential equation? How would we solve this equation? I know the answer is [tex]M(t) = M(0)e^{rt}[/tex]

Finally the equation [tex]e^{-r(T-t)}[/tex] relates the value you will get earlier given that you know the dollar value at time T. Is this a result of the differential equation?

Thanks a lot. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
courtrigrad said:
Hello all

For discrete compunding, we have after n years [itex](1+r)^{n}[/itex] where r is the interest rate. IF we receive m interest payments at a rate of [tex]\frac {r}{m}[/tex] then our discrete compounding equation becomes [tex](1+ \frac{r}{m})^m = e^{m\log(1+(\frac{r}{m}))} \doteq e^r[/tex] After time t we will have [tex]e^{rt}[/tex]. My question is, how do they receive the approximation of [tex]e^r[/tex]? Could we look at this as a differential equation such that if we have an amount [tex]M(t)[/tex] in the bank at time t, how much will it increase from one day to another? So [tex]M(t+dt) - M(t) \doteq \frac{dM}{dt}dt + ...[/tex] How do we get the right hand side or approximation? I know it has something to do with a Taylor Series, but could someone please show me?

[tex]\frac{dM}{dt}dt = rM(t)dt[/tex] so [tex]\frac{dM}{dt} = rM(t)[/tex] Why do we multiply by [tex]dt[/tex] in the differential equation? How would we solve this equation? I know the answer is [tex]M(t) = M(0)e^{rt}[/tex]

Finally the equation [tex]e^{-r(T-t)}[/tex] relates the value you will get earlier given that you know the dollar value at time T. Is this a result of the differential equation?

Thanks a lot. :smile:

1.They used an aproximation...That is for very small [itex]\frac{r}{m}[/itex]

[tex]\lim_{\frac{r}{m}\rightarrow 0} [(1+\frac{r}{m})^{\frac{m}{r}}]^{r}=e^{r}[/tex]

using the definition of "e"...


2.They multiplied by "dt" to SEPARATE VARIABLES IN THE DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION.It's a standard method...

Daniel.
 
Thanks. How did they get this: [tex]M(t+dt) - M(t) \doteq \frac{dM}{dt}dt + ...[/tex]
 
oh so basically for separation of variables we have [tex]\frac {dy}{dx} = g(x)f(y)[/tex] then the solution is [tex]\int \frac{dy}{f(y)} = \int g(x) dx[/tex]
 
That's right... :smile: That's the easiest method among all methods to integrate SOME diff.eqns.

Daniel.
 
Could someone please show me how they got this: [tex]M(t+dt) - M(t) \doteq \frac{dM}{dt}dt + ...[/tex] (I know from the other posts it is a Taylor series expansion) however could you just explain this a little further?

Also with the separation of variables, [tex]\frac{dM}{dt} = rM(t)[/tex] could someone please show me how they separate the variables?

Also how do you get [tex]e^{-r(T-t)}[/tex] for the value of the money at an earlier time?


Thanks :smile:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K